Multidisciplinary High-Risk Obstetrical Simulation Improves Periviability Counseling [ID: 1366577]

Sabrina C Burn, Lou Clark, Sarah Cross, Julie Johnson Rolfes, Joseph M. Miller
{"title":"Multidisciplinary High-Risk Obstetrical Simulation Improves Periviability Counseling [ID: 1366577]","authors":"Sabrina C Burn, Lou Clark, Sarah Cross, Julie Johnson Rolfes, Joseph M. Miller","doi":"10.1097/01.aog.0000930872.37320.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of multidisciplinary simulation in the development of skills required for high-risk periviability counseling. METHODS: Trainees were recruited from the University of Minnesota to participate in a faculty-observed standardized high-risk periviability patient simulation. The simulation was unique in that multiple specialties collaborated in the evaluation, counseling, and management of their patient. Trainees completed presimulation and postsimulation knowledge and comfort self-assessment surveys to evaluate skill improvement and merit of the study. Evaluations were also performed by faculty and simulated patients. An IRB waiver was obtained. RESULTS: Of the 18 participants, there were 6 neonatal intensive care unit fellows, 2 maternal–fetal medicine fellows, and 10 senior ob-gyn residents. Presimulation and postsimulation Likert surveys with scale 1–5, showed improvement in the ability of trainees to elicit patient values and tailor their conversations (pre-mean 2.84, SD 0.67; post-mean 3.39, SD 0.59), use patient-centered language (pre-mean 3.37, SD 0.74; post-mean 3.89, SD 0.57), ally with patients (pre-mean 3.37, SD 0.93; post-mean 3.94, SD 0.52), provide difficult medical information (pre-mean 3.32, SD 1.03; post-mean 3.67, SD 0.58), discuss medical uncertainty (pre-mean 3.11, SD 0.79; post-mean 3.50, SD 0.60), and understand their own implicit biases (pre-mean 3.26, SD 0.71; post-mean 3.50, SD 0.60). Trainees also reported an increased use of hopeful language that did not focus on statistical outcomes (pre-mean 3.00, SD 0.65; post-mean 3.33, SD 0.47) and discussion of multiple management options, including comfort cares (pre-mean 2.05, SD 1.05; post-mean 2.94, SD 0.85). The post surveys also reflected that trainees felt the simulation was useful, provided a safe environment to practice counseling (mean 4.83, SD 0.37), and better prepared them for future high-risk obstetrical scenarios (mean 4.83, SD 0.37). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary high-risk obstetrical simulation offers a unique opportunity for trainees to receive structured training and improve their ability to collaboratively counsel in rare high-risk obstetrical scenarios.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000930872.37320.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of multidisciplinary simulation in the development of skills required for high-risk periviability counseling. METHODS: Trainees were recruited from the University of Minnesota to participate in a faculty-observed standardized high-risk periviability patient simulation. The simulation was unique in that multiple specialties collaborated in the evaluation, counseling, and management of their patient. Trainees completed presimulation and postsimulation knowledge and comfort self-assessment surveys to evaluate skill improvement and merit of the study. Evaluations were also performed by faculty and simulated patients. An IRB waiver was obtained. RESULTS: Of the 18 participants, there were 6 neonatal intensive care unit fellows, 2 maternal–fetal medicine fellows, and 10 senior ob-gyn residents. Presimulation and postsimulation Likert surveys with scale 1–5, showed improvement in the ability of trainees to elicit patient values and tailor their conversations (pre-mean 2.84, SD 0.67; post-mean 3.39, SD 0.59), use patient-centered language (pre-mean 3.37, SD 0.74; post-mean 3.89, SD 0.57), ally with patients (pre-mean 3.37, SD 0.93; post-mean 3.94, SD 0.52), provide difficult medical information (pre-mean 3.32, SD 1.03; post-mean 3.67, SD 0.58), discuss medical uncertainty (pre-mean 3.11, SD 0.79; post-mean 3.50, SD 0.60), and understand their own implicit biases (pre-mean 3.26, SD 0.71; post-mean 3.50, SD 0.60). Trainees also reported an increased use of hopeful language that did not focus on statistical outcomes (pre-mean 3.00, SD 0.65; post-mean 3.33, SD 0.47) and discussion of multiple management options, including comfort cares (pre-mean 2.05, SD 1.05; post-mean 2.94, SD 0.85). The post surveys also reflected that trainees felt the simulation was useful, provided a safe environment to practice counseling (mean 4.83, SD 0.37), and better prepared them for future high-risk obstetrical scenarios (mean 4.83, SD 0.37). CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary high-risk obstetrical simulation offers a unique opportunity for trainees to receive structured training and improve their ability to collaboratively counsel in rare high-risk obstetrical scenarios.
多学科高危产科模拟改善临产期咨询[ID: 1366577]
简介:本研究的目的是确定多学科模拟在高风险生存咨询所需技能发展中的可行性和有效性。方法:从明尼苏达大学招募受训者参加教师观察的标准化高危患者模拟。模拟的独特之处在于多个专业在评估、咨询和管理患者方面进行了合作。学员完成了模拟前和模拟后的知识和舒适度自我评估调查,以评估技能的提高和研究的价值。教师和模拟患者也进行了评估。获得了内部审查委员会的豁免。结果:18名参与者中,新生儿重症监护病房研究员6名,母胎医学研究员2名,高级妇产科住院医师10名。模拟前和模拟后李克特量表1-5的调查显示,受训者引出患者价值观和定制对话的能力有所提高(前均值2.84,标准差0.67;后均值3.39,SD 0.59),使用以患者为中心的语言(前均值3.37,SD 0.74;后均值3.89,SD 0.57),与患者一致(前均值3.37,SD 0.93;后均值3.94,SD 0.52),提供困难的医疗信息(前均值3.32,SD 1.03;后均值3.67,SD 0.58),讨论医疗不确定性(前均值3.11,SD 0.79;后均值3.50,SD 0.60),并了解自己的内隐偏见(前均值3.26,SD 0.71;后均值3.50,标准差0.60)。受训人员还报告说,他们更多地使用不关注统计结果的充满希望的语言(平均前值3.00,标准差0.65;后均值3.33,SD 0.47),并讨论了多种管理方案,包括舒适护理(前均值2.05,SD 1.05;后均值2.94,标准差0.85)。后期调查也反映受训人员认为模拟是有用的,提供了一个安全的环境来练习咨询(平均4.83,SD 0.37),并更好地为未来的高危产科情况做好准备(平均4.83,SD 0.37)。结论:多学科高危产科模拟为受训者提供了一个独特的机会,可以接受结构化的培训,提高他们在罕见的高危产科情况下的协作咨询能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信