Untreated or ammoniated cotton gin trash in the ensiling of elephant grass reduces silage quality

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
D. Quadros, A. P. Andrade, Guilherme Soares de Souza, Fagner Estevam da Silva, E. O. Cavalcante
{"title":"Untreated or ammoniated cotton gin trash in the ensiling of elephant grass reduces silage quality","authors":"D. Quadros, A. P. Andrade, Guilherme Soares de Souza, Fagner Estevam da Silva, E. O. Cavalcante","doi":"10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the inclusion of untreated or urea-ammoniated CGT on the chemical composition, pH, gas, and effluent losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), and aerobic stability of elephantgrass silage. The experiment was laid out in a randomized design with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement represented by three levels of inclusion of CGT during ensiling (0, 5, or 10%) and three levels of ammoniation of CGT with urea before ensiling (0, 4 or 8% for 28 days), using four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test, considering a 5% significance level. The pH and DM, NDIN, ADIN, NDF and ADF contents of the silages increased (p < 0.05) with the inclusion of CGT, regardless of ammoniation. The lowest (p < 0.05) effluent loss was achieved using 10% of CGT ammoniated with 8% urea. In contrast, the elephantgrass silage exhibited the lowest (p < 0.05) gas loss and the greatest (p < 0.05) DMR. The inclusion of CGT compromised the aerobic stability of the silage. Therefore, the inclusion of CGT – either untreated or ammoniated – in the ensiling of elephantgrass is not recommended.","PeriodicalId":7149,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v45i1.58352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the inclusion of untreated or urea-ammoniated CGT on the chemical composition, pH, gas, and effluent losses, dry matter recovery (DMR), and aerobic stability of elephantgrass silage. The experiment was laid out in a randomized design with a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement represented by three levels of inclusion of CGT during ensiling (0, 5, or 10%) and three levels of ammoniation of CGT with urea before ensiling (0, 4 or 8% for 28 days), using four replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and Tukey's test, considering a 5% significance level. The pH and DM, NDIN, ADIN, NDF and ADF contents of the silages increased (p < 0.05) with the inclusion of CGT, regardless of ammoniation. The lowest (p < 0.05) effluent loss was achieved using 10% of CGT ammoniated with 8% urea. In contrast, the elephantgrass silage exhibited the lowest (p < 0.05) gas loss and the greatest (p < 0.05) DMR. The inclusion of CGT compromised the aerobic stability of the silage. Therefore, the inclusion of CGT – either untreated or ammoniated – in the ensiling of elephantgrass is not recommended.
象草青贮中未经处理或氨化的轧棉垃圾会降低青贮质量
本研究考察了未经处理或尿素氨化CGT对象草青贮的化学成分、pH值、气体和废水损失、干物质回收率(DMR)和有氧稳定性的影响。试验采用3 × 3因子随机设计,分别在青贮期间添加3个水平的CGT(0、5、10%),在青贮前用尿素氨化3个水平的CGT(0、4、8%,28 d),共4个重复。数据进行方差分析和Tukey检验,考虑5%显著性水平。无论氨化程度如何,添加CGT后青贮饲料的pH、DM、NDIN、ADIN、NDF和ADF含量均显著升高(p < 0.05)。10% CGT加8%尿素氨化处理出水损失最小(p < 0.05)。相比之下,象草青贮的气体损失最低(p < 0.05), DMR最高(p < 0.05)。CGT的加入损害了青贮饲料的有氧稳定性。因此,不建议在象草青贮中加入CGT——无论是未经处理的还是氨化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信