PG18 Collaborating with carers to create a simulation scenario for medical students

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
Anna Ludvigsen, Joshua Bachra, Julie Rastall, Gemmel Ayer, Kehinde Junaid
{"title":"PG18 Collaborating with carers to create a simulation scenario for medical students","authors":"Anna Ludvigsen, Joshua Bachra, Julie Rastall, Gemmel Ayer, Kehinde Junaid","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Simulation-based learning provides the opportunity for collaboration with those who have lived experience of mental illness, either first hand or as carers. There is, however, little research into whether training that has been created in this way is acceptable to trainee healthcare professionals. Summary of Work A simulation scenario was created by a group consisting of carers, psychiatrists, simulation faculty, psychiatric nurses, a dementia peer support worker, an involvement lead, involvement volunteers, a clinical educationalist and actors. A cohort of 123 fourth year medical students took part in simulation learning sessions. The session followed a facilitation model developed in-house specifically for psychiatry. The model is built on a social constructivist approach with an emphasis on problem based learning and interpersonal reflection.12 Results 111 of 123 participants completed feedback forms at the end of their session (85% fully completed, 5% partially completed). All but one agreed, or strongly agreed, that the simulation was helpful and relevant to their learning needs. A thematic analysis of free text responses to the questions ‘What was most helpful about the session?’ and ‘What was least helpful about the session?’ was carried out. The following themes emerged as being the most and least useful aspects of the experience: Most helpful: the facilitation format; the realism of the scenario and actors; feedback from actors; taking part in the simulation or observing others take part in the simulation. Least helpful: Reflective discussions; the fact that not everyone was able to participate in the simulation; lack of objective feedback on performance; the fact the session was not geared towards passing their OSCE’s. Discussion This format of simulation based learning was acceptable to all medical students who fully completed feedback forms (85% of total participants). All would recommend it to a colleague and 99% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that it was helpful and relevant to their learning needs. A key aim of the programme was to ensure that the voice of carers was represented with authenticity, something that may not happen if actor’s roles are written without their involvement. Students commented positively on the realism of the scenario and the skill of the actors. Some explicitly stated that the actor’s feedback, based on a framework created by carers, was especially helpful and impactful. Recommendations Further analysis of how collaboration with carers affected the programme is required to better understand how their contribution impacted on the course. References Steffe LP, Gale J. Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995. p.53 Ludvigsen, A; Adaptation of a Debriefing Model; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339104472_Adaptation_of_a_Debriefing_Model_for_Simulation_Based_Learning_in_Undergraduate_Older_Adult_Psychiatry_Teaching;","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Simulation-based learning provides the opportunity for collaboration with those who have lived experience of mental illness, either first hand or as carers. There is, however, little research into whether training that has been created in this way is acceptable to trainee healthcare professionals. Summary of Work A simulation scenario was created by a group consisting of carers, psychiatrists, simulation faculty, psychiatric nurses, a dementia peer support worker, an involvement lead, involvement volunteers, a clinical educationalist and actors. A cohort of 123 fourth year medical students took part in simulation learning sessions. The session followed a facilitation model developed in-house specifically for psychiatry. The model is built on a social constructivist approach with an emphasis on problem based learning and interpersonal reflection.12 Results 111 of 123 participants completed feedback forms at the end of their session (85% fully completed, 5% partially completed). All but one agreed, or strongly agreed, that the simulation was helpful and relevant to their learning needs. A thematic analysis of free text responses to the questions ‘What was most helpful about the session?’ and ‘What was least helpful about the session?’ was carried out. The following themes emerged as being the most and least useful aspects of the experience: Most helpful: the facilitation format; the realism of the scenario and actors; feedback from actors; taking part in the simulation or observing others take part in the simulation. Least helpful: Reflective discussions; the fact that not everyone was able to participate in the simulation; lack of objective feedback on performance; the fact the session was not geared towards passing their OSCE’s. Discussion This format of simulation based learning was acceptable to all medical students who fully completed feedback forms (85% of total participants). All would recommend it to a colleague and 99% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that it was helpful and relevant to their learning needs. A key aim of the programme was to ensure that the voice of carers was represented with authenticity, something that may not happen if actor’s roles are written without their involvement. Students commented positively on the realism of the scenario and the skill of the actors. Some explicitly stated that the actor’s feedback, based on a framework created by carers, was especially helpful and impactful. Recommendations Further analysis of how collaboration with carers affected the programme is required to better understand how their contribution impacted on the course. References Steffe LP, Gale J. Constructivism in Education, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995. p.53 Ludvigsen, A; Adaptation of a Debriefing Model; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339104472_Adaptation_of_a_Debriefing_Model_for_Simulation_Based_Learning_in_Undergraduate_Older_Adult_Psychiatry_Teaching;
PG18与护理人员合作,为医学生创建模拟场景
基于模拟的学习提供了与那些有过精神疾病经历的人合作的机会,无论是亲身经历还是作为护理人员。然而,很少有研究表明,以这种方式创建的培训是否可以接受实习医疗保健专业人员。一个模拟场景是由护理人员、精神科医生、模拟教员、精神科护士、痴呆症同伴支持工作者、参与领导、参与志愿者、临床教育家和演员组成的小组创建的。123名四年级医学生参加了模拟学习课程。会议遵循了内部专门为精神病学开发的促进模式。该模型建立在社会建构主义的方法上,强调基于问题的学习和人际反思结果123名参与者中有111人在会议结束时完成了反馈表格(85%完全完成,5%部分完成)。除了一个人之外,所有人都同意,或者非常同意,模拟是有帮助的,与他们的学习需求相关。对自由文本回答“会议中最有帮助的是什么?”和“这个过程中最没有帮助的是什么?”回答。下列主题是经验中最有用和最没用的方面:最有用的:促进形式;场景和演员的真实性;演员反馈;参与模拟或观察他人参与模拟。最无益的:反思性讨论;并不是每个人都能参与到模拟中;缺乏对业绩的客观反馈;事实上,这次会议并不是为了通过欧安组织的决议。所有完整填写了反馈表格的医学生(占总参与者的85%)都可以接受这种基于模拟的学习形式。所有人都会把它推荐给同事,99%的受访者同意或强烈同意它对他们的学习需求有帮助和相关。该计划的一个关键目标是确保护理人员的声音得到真实的表达,如果演员的角色是在没有他们参与的情况下编写的,这可能不会发生。同学们对表演的真实感和演员的演技给予了积极的评价。一些人明确表示,演员的反馈是基于护理人员创建的框架,特别有帮助和有影响力。建议需要进一步分析与护理人员的合作如何影响课程,以更好地了解他们的贡献如何影响课程。李建平,张建平。建构主义教育理论与实践[j] .教育科学,2002。p.53Ludvigsen,;汇报模式的适应;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339104472_Adaptation_of_a_Debriefing_Model_for_Simulation_Based_Learning_in_Undergraduate_Older_Adult_Psychiatry_Teaching;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信