The civics test: a political or educational tool for creating the perfect citizen? A historical overview of forms and processes of naturalization in the United States

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. V. Ruyskensvelde, Mary Kathryn Ketch
{"title":"The civics test: a political or educational tool for creating the perfect citizen? A historical overview of forms and processes of naturalization in the United States","authors":"S. V. Ruyskensvelde, Mary Kathryn Ketch","doi":"10.24908/EOE-ESE-RSE.V19I0.7824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Naturalization, or the process through which citizenship is granted to a foreigner, is a process that has begun to increasingly look like that of the school. In the United States, as in many other countries, one of the main features of the naturalization is the civics test. This paper aims to document the historical development of naturalization procedures in the United States and shed light on how schoolish tools were introduced to decide who can be offered or denied American citizenship. Much of past research has critiqued the civics test for its unreliability, or difficulty for even natives. We argue, however, that the current civics test is rather a product of a system that began without a solid foundation. In an attempt to avoid fraud and control efficiency, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has promoted the use of a test that devalues the importance of the choice to re-align loyalties to a country and regulates it to memory testing.","PeriodicalId":41777,"journal":{"name":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/EOE-ESE-RSE.V19I0.7824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Naturalization, or the process through which citizenship is granted to a foreigner, is a process that has begun to increasingly look like that of the school. In the United States, as in many other countries, one of the main features of the naturalization is the civics test. This paper aims to document the historical development of naturalization procedures in the United States and shed light on how schoolish tools were introduced to decide who can be offered or denied American citizenship. Much of past research has critiqued the civics test for its unreliability, or difficulty for even natives. We argue, however, that the current civics test is rather a product of a system that began without a solid foundation. In an attempt to avoid fraud and control efficiency, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has promoted the use of a test that devalues the importance of the choice to re-align loyalties to a country and regulates it to memory testing.
公民测验:创造完美公民的政治或教育工具?美国入籍的形式和过程的历史概述
入籍,或外国人获得公民身份的过程,是一个越来越像学校的过程。在美国,和许多其他国家一样,入籍的主要特点之一是公民考试。本文旨在记录美国入籍程序的历史发展,并阐明如何引入学校工具来决定谁可以获得或拒绝美国公民身份。过去的许多研究都批评公民测试不可靠,或者即使对当地人来说也很难。然而,我们认为,目前的公民考试是一个没有坚实基础的制度的产物。为了避免欺诈和控制效率,美国公民及移民服务局(USCIS)提倡使用一种测试,这种测试贬低了重新调整对一个国家忠诚的选择的重要性,并将其规范为记忆测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Encounters in Theory and History of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信