{"title":"Controlling Unintended Growth: An Exploratory Study of Coping with Unintended Growth in Small and Medium-sized Firms","authors":"Martin Senderovitz, M. R. Evald","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.ju.00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionA significant number of studies on firm growth based on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have been published (Davidsson, Achtenhagen, and Naldi, 2010; Senderovitz, 2011). Similarly, much is known about the external and internal drivers of firm growth-and about the barriers that prevent firms from realizing desired growth (Storey, 2011; Davidsson and Wiklund, 2000; Goffee and Scase, 1995; Reynolds, Bygrave, and Autio, 2003). Studies show that growth intentions and organizational capabilities as well as favorable, external, contextual circumstances are among key drivers of growth. Conversely, lack of growth is mainly due to internal lack of resources and/or capabilities or unfavorable, external, contextual circumstances that hinder the (desired) growth of the small firm. The underlying belief is that SMEs and their owner-managers do, indeed, have a desire to grow their business if and when they have the means and opportunities to do so (Davidsson and Wiklund, 2000; O'Regan, Ghobadian, and Gallear, 2006; Storey, 2011). However, other studies reveal that it may be equally relevant to examine socio-cultural factors to determine why some SMEs stay small. Studies show that a large number of small firms remain small and that the owner-managers of a large share of these firms have no desire to grow (Penrose, 1959/95; Burns, 1989; Birley, 1996; Vickery, 1989). These firms deliberately avoid growth and thus stay small (Davidsson, 1989).In contrast to these well-documented situations, there is an additional growth situation that has not previously received much attention in the literature: the situation in which growth in SMEs occurs without explicit growth intentions and when growth is perceived as being problematic. Through an explorative, in-depth case study (Eisenhardt, 1989; Yin, 2003) this study shows how SMEs may tackle growth in situations in which their organization is growing organically despite lacking growth intentions, and in which the firm perceives growth as problematic and unwanted. In these situations, owner-managers employ different coping strategies in their efforts to control or constrain growth.Growth literature has demonstrated that small, growing firms face a wide range of organizational and managerial challenges (Greiner, 1972; Churchill and Lewis, 1983; Hofer and Charan, 1984). Moreover, despite numerous theoretical arguments in favor of firm growth, growth may not always be perceived as a positive development by the management of smaller firms (Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009; Senderovitz, Klyver, and Steffens, 2015). This study supports the notion that there may be good and sound reasons why an SME/owner-manager may see growth as unwanted and problematic. However, it also shows how unintended and unwanted growth can be handled successfully or at least constrained so that the perceived obstacles and challenges associated with growth can be overcome.The results of the explorative case study show that more knowledge is needed about how growth-reluctant SMEs tackle firm growth they perceive as problematic and therefore endeavor to limit or even prevent it. Investigating this situation will allow researchers to explore on what grounds growth occurs. This need for more knowledge is also in line with recent research findings indicating that firms that grow successfully first secure profitability and only then embrace growth (Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009). The authors agree with Davidsson and colleagues that caution is warranted whenever a universal and uncritical growth ideology is proposed, and that recent findings allow us to see the widespread reluctance of small-firm owner-managers in a different light (Davidsson, Achtenhagen, and Naldi, 2010). Not all types of growth are attractive. In line with Achtenhagen and colleagues (2010, p. 298), the authors of the present paper also see a need for broadening of the scholarly discussions that have so far taken place in the growth literature so that a closer link can be forged between how researchers conduct growth studies and how practitioners perceive business growth. …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"2 1","pages":"36-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.3709.2016.ju.00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionA significant number of studies on firm growth based on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have been published (Davidsson, Achtenhagen, and Naldi, 2010; Senderovitz, 2011). Similarly, much is known about the external and internal drivers of firm growth-and about the barriers that prevent firms from realizing desired growth (Storey, 2011; Davidsson and Wiklund, 2000; Goffee and Scase, 1995; Reynolds, Bygrave, and Autio, 2003). Studies show that growth intentions and organizational capabilities as well as favorable, external, contextual circumstances are among key drivers of growth. Conversely, lack of growth is mainly due to internal lack of resources and/or capabilities or unfavorable, external, contextual circumstances that hinder the (desired) growth of the small firm. The underlying belief is that SMEs and their owner-managers do, indeed, have a desire to grow their business if and when they have the means and opportunities to do so (Davidsson and Wiklund, 2000; O'Regan, Ghobadian, and Gallear, 2006; Storey, 2011). However, other studies reveal that it may be equally relevant to examine socio-cultural factors to determine why some SMEs stay small. Studies show that a large number of small firms remain small and that the owner-managers of a large share of these firms have no desire to grow (Penrose, 1959/95; Burns, 1989; Birley, 1996; Vickery, 1989). These firms deliberately avoid growth and thus stay small (Davidsson, 1989).In contrast to these well-documented situations, there is an additional growth situation that has not previously received much attention in the literature: the situation in which growth in SMEs occurs without explicit growth intentions and when growth is perceived as being problematic. Through an explorative, in-depth case study (Eisenhardt, 1989; Yin, 2003) this study shows how SMEs may tackle growth in situations in which their organization is growing organically despite lacking growth intentions, and in which the firm perceives growth as problematic and unwanted. In these situations, owner-managers employ different coping strategies in their efforts to control or constrain growth.Growth literature has demonstrated that small, growing firms face a wide range of organizational and managerial challenges (Greiner, 1972; Churchill and Lewis, 1983; Hofer and Charan, 1984). Moreover, despite numerous theoretical arguments in favor of firm growth, growth may not always be perceived as a positive development by the management of smaller firms (Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009; Senderovitz, Klyver, and Steffens, 2015). This study supports the notion that there may be good and sound reasons why an SME/owner-manager may see growth as unwanted and problematic. However, it also shows how unintended and unwanted growth can be handled successfully or at least constrained so that the perceived obstacles and challenges associated with growth can be overcome.The results of the explorative case study show that more knowledge is needed about how growth-reluctant SMEs tackle firm growth they perceive as problematic and therefore endeavor to limit or even prevent it. Investigating this situation will allow researchers to explore on what grounds growth occurs. This need for more knowledge is also in line with recent research findings indicating that firms that grow successfully first secure profitability and only then embrace growth (Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009). The authors agree with Davidsson and colleagues that caution is warranted whenever a universal and uncritical growth ideology is proposed, and that recent findings allow us to see the widespread reluctance of small-firm owner-managers in a different light (Davidsson, Achtenhagen, and Naldi, 2010). Not all types of growth are attractive. In line with Achtenhagen and colleagues (2010, p. 298), the authors of the present paper also see a need for broadening of the scholarly discussions that have so far taken place in the growth literature so that a closer link can be forged between how researchers conduct growth studies and how practitioners perceive business growth. …
大量基于中小企业(SMEs)的企业成长研究已经发表(Davidsson, Achtenhagen, and Naldi, 2010;Senderovitz, 2011)。同样,关于企业增长的外部和内部驱动因素,以及阻碍企业实现预期增长的障碍,我们也知道得很多(Storey, 2011;戴维森和维克伦德,2000;Goffee and Scase, 1995;Reynolds, Bygrave, and Autio, 2003)。研究表明,增长意图和组织能力以及有利的外部环境是增长的关键驱动因素。相反,缺乏增长主要是由于内部缺乏资源和/或能力,或不利的、外部的、背景的环境,阻碍了小企业的(期望的)增长。基本的信念是,中小企业和他们的业主经理确实有一个愿望,如果和当他们有手段和机会这样做(戴维森和威克伦德,2000;O'Regan, Ghobadian, and Gallear, 2006;层,2011)。然而,其他研究表明,研究社会文化因素可能同样相关,以确定为什么一些中小企业保持小规模。研究表明,大量的小公司规模仍然很小,其中很大一部分公司的所有者和经理没有增长的愿望(Penrose, 1959/ 1995;烧伤,1989;Birley, 1996;维克瑞,1989)。这些公司故意避免增长,从而保持小(戴维森,1989)。与这些有充分记录的情况相反,还有一种以前在文献中没有受到太多关注的增长情况:中小企业的增长发生在没有明确增长意图的情况下,而且增长被认为是有问题的。通过一个探索性的、深入的案例研究(Eisenhardt, 1989;Yin, 2003)这项研究显示了中小企业如何在他们的组织有机增长的情况下解决增长问题,尽管缺乏增长意图,并且公司认为增长是有问题的和不需要的。在这些情况下,业主经理采用不同的应对策略来努力控制或限制增长。成长型文献表明,成长中的小公司面临着广泛的组织和管理挑战(Greiner, 1972;丘吉尔和刘易斯,1983;Hofer and Charan, 1984)。此外,尽管有许多理论论点支持企业增长,但小型企业的管理层可能并不总是将增长视为一种积极的发展(Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009;Senderovitz, Klyver, and Steffens, 2015)。这项研究支持这样一种观点,即中小企业/业主经理可能认为增长是不需要的和有问题的,这可能是有充分理由的。然而,它也展示了如何成功地处理意外和不必要的增长,或者至少限制增长,以便克服与增长相关的感知障碍和挑战。探索性案例研究的结果表明,需要更多的知识来了解不愿增长的中小企业如何应对他们认为有问题的公司增长,从而努力限制甚至阻止它。调查这种情况将使研究人员能够探索在什么地面上生长。这种对更多知识的需求也与最近的研究结果相一致,这些研究结果表明,成功成长的公司首先确保了盈利能力,然后才拥抱增长(Davidsson, Steffens, and Fitzsimmons, 2009)。作者同意戴维森及其同事的观点,即每当提出一种普遍的、不加批判的增长意识形态时,谨慎是有必要的,而且最近的研究结果使我们能够从不同的角度看待小公司所有者经理的普遍不情愿(戴维森、阿希滕哈根和纳尔迪,2010)。并非所有类型的增长都具有吸引力。与Achtenhagen及其同事(2010,第298页)一致,本论文的作者还认为有必要扩大迄今为止在增长文献中发生的学术讨论,以便在研究人员如何进行增长研究和从业者如何看待企业增长之间建立更紧密的联系。…