Narcosis and chemical reactivity QSARs for acute fish toxicity

A. Freidig, J. Hermens
{"title":"Narcosis and chemical reactivity QSARs for acute fish toxicity","authors":"A. Freidig, J. Hermens","doi":"10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:6<547::AID-QSAR547>3.0.CO;2-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) that describe the acute fish toxicity have been published for many different groups of reactive organic chemicals. The structural similarity of chemicals within such groups, suggests that they share a common mode of action (MOA) which is based on their common chemical reactivity. Often, however, a descriptor for this reactivity alone can not explain the observed toxicity satisfactory but addition of a hydrophobicity parameter, like log KOW, is found to improve the relationship. In the present paper, an alternative strategy is proposed and tested with three different literature data sets. Instead of searching for better descriptors to establish a QSAR for the whole data set, the assumption that all compounds within the set act by the same MOA was critically reviewed. We tested the hypothesis that some of the compounds within the data sets acted by narcosis (general anesthesia), a second plausible mode of action in acute fish toxicity. Narcosis potency at observed lethal exposure levels was modeled with a baseline toxicity QSAR. The literature data sets were split in a narcosis and a reactive subset and for each of them a separate, one-parameter QSAR was established. For a set of OP-esters, nine out of 20 compounds were identified as possible narcotic compounds and their toxicity could be described with a narcosis QSAR. For the 11 compounds remaining in the reactive subset, a good correlation between acute toxicity and measured, in-vitro AChE inhibition rate was found (r2=0.68) which would have been overlooked if the whole data set was used. The use of two separate QSARs instead of one mixed QSAR was also tested for literature data sets of nitrobenzenes and α,β-unsaturated carboxylates. It was shown that for the description of toxicity data of all three groups of reactive compounds, a model which uses two separate modes of action was superior to a mixed model which uses a reactivity and a hydrophobicity parameter in a multiple linear regression.","PeriodicalId":20818,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","volume":"20 1","pages":"547-553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3838(200012)19:6<547::AID-QSAR547>3.0.CO;2-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) that describe the acute fish toxicity have been published for many different groups of reactive organic chemicals. The structural similarity of chemicals within such groups, suggests that they share a common mode of action (MOA) which is based on their common chemical reactivity. Often, however, a descriptor for this reactivity alone can not explain the observed toxicity satisfactory but addition of a hydrophobicity parameter, like log KOW, is found to improve the relationship. In the present paper, an alternative strategy is proposed and tested with three different literature data sets. Instead of searching for better descriptors to establish a QSAR for the whole data set, the assumption that all compounds within the set act by the same MOA was critically reviewed. We tested the hypothesis that some of the compounds within the data sets acted by narcosis (general anesthesia), a second plausible mode of action in acute fish toxicity. Narcosis potency at observed lethal exposure levels was modeled with a baseline toxicity QSAR. The literature data sets were split in a narcosis and a reactive subset and for each of them a separate, one-parameter QSAR was established. For a set of OP-esters, nine out of 20 compounds were identified as possible narcotic compounds and their toxicity could be described with a narcosis QSAR. For the 11 compounds remaining in the reactive subset, a good correlation between acute toxicity and measured, in-vitro AChE inhibition rate was found (r2=0.68) which would have been overlooked if the whole data set was used. The use of two separate QSARs instead of one mixed QSAR was also tested for literature data sets of nitrobenzenes and α,β-unsaturated carboxylates. It was shown that for the description of toxicity data of all three groups of reactive compounds, a model which uses two separate modes of action was superior to a mixed model which uses a reactivity and a hydrophobicity parameter in a multiple linear regression.
鱼类急性中毒的麻醉和化学反应性qsar
描述鱼类急性毒性的定量构效关系(Quantitative structure - activity relationship, QSAR)已经在许多不同类型的活性有机化学物质中得到了应用。这些基团中化学物质的结构相似性表明,它们基于共同的化学反应性而具有共同的作用模式(MOA)。然而,通常仅用这种反应性的描述符不能令人满意地解释观察到的毒性,但发现疏水性参数(如log KOW)的加入可以改善关系。在本文中,提出了一种替代策略,并使用三种不同的文献数据集进行了测试。我们没有寻找更好的描述符来建立整个数据集的QSAR,而是对集合中所有化合物都由相同的MOA起作用的假设进行了严格审查。我们测试了这样一个假设,即数据集中的一些化合物通过麻醉(全身麻醉)起作用,这是鱼类急性中毒的第二种可能的作用方式。在观察到的致死暴露水平下,麻醉效力用基线毒性QSAR建模。文献数据集分为麻醉状态和反应性子集,并为每个子集建立一个单独的单参数QSAR。对于一组op -酯,20种化合物中有9种被确定为可能的麻醉化合物,它们的毒性可以用麻醉QSAR来描述。对于活性亚群中剩余的11种化合物,发现急性毒性与测定的体外AChE抑制率之间存在良好的相关性(r2=0.68),如果使用整个数据集,则会忽略这一点。对硝基苯和α,β-不饱和羧酸盐的文献数据集也测试了使用两个单独的QSAR而不是一个混合QSAR。结果表明,对于三组活性化合物的毒性数据的描述,在多元线性回归中,使用两种单独作用模式的模型优于使用反应性和疏水性参数的混合模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信