Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Electoacupunture Efficacy on Acute Gout

Jiin Hwang, A. Song, Hongyu Song
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Electoacupunture Efficacy on Acute Gout","authors":"Jiin Hwang, A. Song, Hongyu Song","doi":"10.13048/jkm.22022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The objective of this study was to appraise the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) for the treatment of acute gout.Methods: Since no suitable study could be found in the domestic database, we performed a literature search up to the end of December 2020 using four international electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of EA in the treatment of acute gout were included. The risk of bias was evaluated from the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Results: Eight appropriate RCTs were included and analyzed. Three evaluation tools were mainly used: Total Effective Rate (TER), Uric acid (UA), and Pain score (VAS). In the case of TER, in all eight cases, electroacupuncture alone and combined treatment showed a statistically significant level of improvement compared to Western medicine treatment. In the case of VAS score, electroacupuncture alone and combined treatment showed a more significant effect than Western medicine treatment. In the case of UA level, electroacupuncture combined treatment showed a more significant effect than western medicine treatment. Although not all three evaluation tools were used in all studies, the majority of studies showed that electroacupuncture was effective for acute gout patients.Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that EA treatment may be effective for acute gout. It should be noted, however, that the studies included in this study were geographically biased, small in number, and mostly at high risk of bias. More well-designed studies are needed in the future.","PeriodicalId":16164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.22022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to appraise the effect of electroacupuncture (EA) for the treatment of acute gout.Methods: Since no suitable study could be found in the domestic database, we performed a literature search up to the end of December 2020 using four international electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of EA in the treatment of acute gout were included. The risk of bias was evaluated from the Cochrane risk of bias tool.Results: Eight appropriate RCTs were included and analyzed. Three evaluation tools were mainly used: Total Effective Rate (TER), Uric acid (UA), and Pain score (VAS). In the case of TER, in all eight cases, electroacupuncture alone and combined treatment showed a statistically significant level of improvement compared to Western medicine treatment. In the case of VAS score, electroacupuncture alone and combined treatment showed a more significant effect than Western medicine treatment. In the case of UA level, electroacupuncture combined treatment showed a more significant effect than western medicine treatment. Although not all three evaluation tools were used in all studies, the majority of studies showed that electroacupuncture was effective for acute gout patients.Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that EA treatment may be effective for acute gout. It should be noted, however, that the studies included in this study were geographically biased, small in number, and mostly at high risk of bias. More well-designed studies are needed in the future.
电针治疗急性痛风疗效的系统评价与meta分析
目的:本研究的目的是评价电针(EA)治疗急性痛风的效果。方法:由于国内数据库中未找到合适的研究,我们使用四个国际电子数据库检索了截至2020年12月底的文献。随机对照试验(rct)评估EA治疗急性痛风的有效性。通过Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入8个合适的随机对照试验进行分析。主要采用三种评估工具:总有效率(TER)、尿酸(UA)和疼痛评分(VAS)。在TER病例中,与西医治疗相比,在所有8例中,电针单独治疗和联合治疗均有统计学意义的改善。在VAS评分的情况下,电针单独和联合治疗比西药治疗效果更显著。在UA水平较高的情况下,电针联合治疗比西药治疗效果更显著。虽然并非所有研究都使用了这三种评估工具,但大多数研究表明电针对急性痛风患者有效。结论:本研究结果提示EA治疗急性痛风可能有效。但值得注意的是,本研究纳入的研究存在地理偏倚,数量少,偏倚风险高。未来需要更多精心设计的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信