Knee OA management: A cost-effectiveness analysis of platelet-rich-plasma versus hyaluronic acid for the intra-articular treatment of knee OA in France

L. Stefano, L. Paolo, A. Russo
{"title":"Knee OA management: A cost-effectiveness analysis of platelet-rich-plasma versus hyaluronic acid for the intra-articular treatment of knee OA in France","authors":"L. Stefano, L. Paolo, A. Russo","doi":"10.4172/1758-4272.1000202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this work is to carry out an economic evaluation of the intra-articular (i.a.) use of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in the short period treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Recently the scientific literature has shown the effectiveness of this treatment. The comparator adopted is the Hyaluronic acid (HA) which represents the standard i.a. therapy. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a decision tree model. The effectiveness outcomes are reported in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). The costs are reported in Euro (€) currency evaluated in 2016. Deterministic and probabilistic sensibility analyses are reported in order to evaluate the robustness of the results and account for the different sources of uncertainty. Results: The PRP therapy results more costly but also more effective than HA. Using a Willingness to pay thresholds of € 10,000/QALY, the PRP is cost-effective with respect to HA, for patient with moderate to severe knee OA, presenting an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of €760 per QALY.","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":"87 1","pages":"307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1758-4272.1000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this work is to carry out an economic evaluation of the intra-articular (i.a.) use of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy in the short period treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Recently the scientific literature has shown the effectiveness of this treatment. The comparator adopted is the Hyaluronic acid (HA) which represents the standard i.a. therapy. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a decision tree model. The effectiveness outcomes are reported in terms of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). The costs are reported in Euro (€) currency evaluated in 2016. Deterministic and probabilistic sensibility analyses are reported in order to evaluate the robustness of the results and account for the different sources of uncertainty. Results: The PRP therapy results more costly but also more effective than HA. Using a Willingness to pay thresholds of € 10,000/QALY, the PRP is cost-effective with respect to HA, for patient with moderate to severe knee OA, presenting an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of €760 per QALY.
膝关节OA管理:法国富血小板血浆与透明质酸在膝关节OA关节内治疗中的成本-效果分析
目的:本研究的目的是对短期治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗进行关节内(i.a)使用的经济评估。最近的科学文献已经证明了这种治疗的有效性。采用的比较物是透明质酸(HA),它代表了标准的内毒素治疗。方法:采用决策树模型进行成本-效果分析。疗效结果以质量调整生命年(QALY)报告。费用以2016年评估的欧元(€)货币报告。为了评估结果的稳健性和考虑不同的不确定性来源,报告了确定性和概率敏感性分析。结果:PRP治疗比HA治疗费用高,但效果好。使用10,000欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值,对于中度至重度膝关节OA患者,PRP相对于HA具有成本效益,每个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为760欧元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信