Does Political Risk Matter for China's Trade with ASEAN and MENA Countries? A Belt Road Initiative Perspective

Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami, Dr. Nisit Panthamit
{"title":"Does Political Risk Matter for China's Trade with ASEAN and MENA Countries? A Belt Road Initiative Perspective","authors":"Dr. Gour Gobinda Goswami, Dr. Nisit Panthamit","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3576559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the role of political risk in deterring China's trade flow with her 132 trading partners with particular attention to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries for 1984-2015 in the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) framework. Using twelve political risk indicators from International Country Risk Guide (ICRG), we use factor analysis to retrieve three underlying factors: 'Cultural Rigidity,' 'Governance Failure,' and 'Partners' Adverse Feeling.' After combining these factors into a dynamic system GMM Gravity equation, we examine their impact on China's trade flow. As we control for Gravity variables and these risk factors, BRI has been found effective for China with MENA countries, ASEAN10, and ASEAN10 + 3 (China, Japan, and South Korea) but detrimental to trade flow within the ASEAN10 + 6 (China, India, Japan, S Korea, Australia, and New Zealand) setup. Among the three factors, 'Partners' Adverse Feeling' is the most substantial deterrent, followed by 'Cultural Rigidities.' Most of the traditional Gravity coefficients like domestic and partner country's GDP, domestic and partner country's per capita GDP, distance, GATT membership of China and Partners, take their right sign and significance. 'Governance failure' has been found as a significant deterrent neither in ASEAN nor in MENA setup. Therefore, China should strive to improve cultural bottlenecks with her partner countries and improve upon the existing adverse perception in enhancing her trade flow with these countries.","PeriodicalId":22382,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"188 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the role of political risk in deterring China's trade flow with her 132 trading partners with particular attention to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries for 1984-2015 in the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) framework. Using twelve political risk indicators from International Country Risk Guide (ICRG), we use factor analysis to retrieve three underlying factors: 'Cultural Rigidity,' 'Governance Failure,' and 'Partners' Adverse Feeling.' After combining these factors into a dynamic system GMM Gravity equation, we examine their impact on China's trade flow. As we control for Gravity variables and these risk factors, BRI has been found effective for China with MENA countries, ASEAN10, and ASEAN10 + 3 (China, Japan, and South Korea) but detrimental to trade flow within the ASEAN10 + 6 (China, India, Japan, S Korea, Australia, and New Zealand) setup. Among the three factors, 'Partners' Adverse Feeling' is the most substantial deterrent, followed by 'Cultural Rigidities.' Most of the traditional Gravity coefficients like domestic and partner country's GDP, domestic and partner country's per capita GDP, distance, GATT membership of China and Partners, take their right sign and significance. 'Governance failure' has been found as a significant deterrent neither in ASEAN nor in MENA setup. Therefore, China should strive to improve cultural bottlenecks with her partner countries and improve upon the existing adverse perception in enhancing her trade flow with these countries.
政治风险是否影响中国与东盟及中东和北非国家的贸易?“一带一路”的视角
本研究考察了政治风险在阻碍中国与132个贸易伙伴的贸易流动中的作用,特别关注1984-2015年“一带一路”框架下的东南亚国家联盟(东盟)和中东北非(MENA)国家。利用国际国家风险指南(ICRG)中的12个政治风险指标,我们使用因素分析来检索三个潜在因素:“文化僵化”、“治理失败”和“合作伙伴的负面情绪”。在将这些因素组合成动态系统GMM重力方程后,我们考察了它们对中国贸易流量的影响。当我们控制重力变量和这些风险因素时,发现“一带一路”对中国与中东和北非国家、东盟10国和东盟10 + 3国(中国、日本和韩国)有效,但对东盟10 + 6国(中国、印度、日本、韩国、澳大利亚和新西兰)的贸易流动有害。在这三个因素中,“伴侣的负面感觉”是最大的阻碍,其次是“文化僵化”。传统的重力系数,如国内与伙伴国GDP、国内与伙伴国人均GDP、距离、中国与伙伴国GATT成员资格等,大多取其正确的符号和意义。无论是在东盟还是在中东和北非地区,“治理失败”都被认为是一个重大的威慑因素。因此,中国应该努力改善与伙伴国之间的文化瓶颈,并在加强与这些国家的贸易往来中改善现有的不利看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信