Waves of Language Diversity Loss in Japan: An Ecological and Theoretical Account

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Patrick Heinrich
{"title":"Waves of Language Diversity Loss in Japan: An Ecological and Theoretical Account","authors":"Patrick Heinrich","doi":"10.47298/jala.v3-i1-a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguistic diversity has seen two large waves of the loss of linguistic diversity across history. The first wave occurred with the transition from hunter-gatherer to agricultural societies, a process that started 11,000 years ago with the Neolithic revolution when agrarian societies colonized territories of hunter-gatherer communities. The second wave started with the establishment of modern nation states and the creation and diffusion of national languages. It is in the latter setting that the vast majority of language endangerment cases are set today. Endangered languages are predominantly replaced by national languages (and not by global English). The institutions of the ‘nation state’ and of ‘national language’ constitute fundamental problems for ethnolinguistic minorities, because their establishment entail the threat of either exclusion or assimilation of these minorities from the nation. In such a situation, minority language and their speakers do usually not fare well. Without altering the modernist language ecologies that exist in modern nation states, language maintenance and revitalization activities are bound to fail in their principal objectives. In this paper, I examine the rise of language nationalism in Japan in the Meiji period (1868-1912), depict how it led to language endangerment, and show how it continues to shape believes about language in contemporary Japan, also within endangered language revitalization activities and policies themselves. Language revitalization requires language ideological clarification, a recalibration of the relations between majority and minorities, and fundamentally new language policies. In the final part, I report on partial changes that can be seen in this direction for the case of the endangered Ainu and Ryukyuan languages in Japan, and analyze to what extent the local language revitalization movements and efforts have so far succeeded in “remaking social reality” (Fishman 1991: 411) together with the majority population of Japan.","PeriodicalId":36068,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47298/jala.v3-i1-a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linguistic diversity has seen two large waves of the loss of linguistic diversity across history. The first wave occurred with the transition from hunter-gatherer to agricultural societies, a process that started 11,000 years ago with the Neolithic revolution when agrarian societies colonized territories of hunter-gatherer communities. The second wave started with the establishment of modern nation states and the creation and diffusion of national languages. It is in the latter setting that the vast majority of language endangerment cases are set today. Endangered languages are predominantly replaced by national languages (and not by global English). The institutions of the ‘nation state’ and of ‘national language’ constitute fundamental problems for ethnolinguistic minorities, because their establishment entail the threat of either exclusion or assimilation of these minorities from the nation. In such a situation, minority language and their speakers do usually not fare well. Without altering the modernist language ecologies that exist in modern nation states, language maintenance and revitalization activities are bound to fail in their principal objectives. In this paper, I examine the rise of language nationalism in Japan in the Meiji period (1868-1912), depict how it led to language endangerment, and show how it continues to shape believes about language in contemporary Japan, also within endangered language revitalization activities and policies themselves. Language revitalization requires language ideological clarification, a recalibration of the relations between majority and minorities, and fundamentally new language policies. In the final part, I report on partial changes that can be seen in this direction for the case of the endangered Ainu and Ryukyuan languages in Japan, and analyze to what extent the local language revitalization movements and efforts have so far succeeded in “remaking social reality” (Fishman 1991: 411) together with the majority population of Japan.
日本语言多样性丧失的浪潮:生态学和理论解释
语言多样性在历史上经历了两次大的语言多样性丧失浪潮。第一波发生在从狩猎采集社会向农业社会过渡的过程中,这一过程始于11000年前的新石器时代革命,当时农业社会殖民了狩猎采集社区的领土。第二次浪潮开始于现代民族国家的建立和民族语言的创造和传播。如今,绝大多数语言濒危案件都是在后者的背景下审理的。濒危语言主要被国家语言(而不是全球英语)所取代。“民族国家”和“民族语言”的机构构成了少数民族语言的基本问题,因为它们的建立带来了这些少数民族被排斥或同化的威胁。在这种情况下,少数民族语言及其使用者通常不会很好地发展。如果不改变存在于现代民族国家中的现代语言生态,语言维护和复兴活动的主要目的就必然失败。在本文中,我研究了明治时期(1868-1912)日本语言民族主义的兴起,描述了它是如何导致语言濒危的,并展示了它如何继续塑造当代日本的语言信仰,也在濒危的语言复兴活动和政策本身中。语言振兴需要澄清语言意识形态,重新调整多数民族和少数民族的关系,并从根本上制定新的语言政策。在最后一部分,我报告了日本濒临灭绝的阿伊努语和琉球语在这个方向上可以看到的部分变化,并分析了地方语言复兴运动和努力到目前为止在多大程度上成功地与日本大多数人口一起“重塑社会现实”(Fishman 1991: 411)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology
Journal on Asian Linguistic Anthropology Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信