{"title":"Recontextualizing Son of Saul: Masculinity in Totalitarian Spaces in Hungarian Film History","authors":"György Kalmár","doi":"10.2478/ausfm-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a result of its radical approach to the topic of the Holocaust, as well as due to the long list of prestigious prizes it won, Son of Saul (Saul fia, 2015, directed by László Nemes Jeles) has put the relation between Eastern European societies and totalitarianism in the centre of public and academic discourse. Though most reviews and articles placed the film in the history of Holocaust-representations, this is not the only context in which the film can be understood. In the present article I argue that Son of Saul can also be read outside (or at least at a distance from) the context of a Holocaust-film, as it also belongs to another, quite different and internationally much less known local cinematic canon. There is an unclaimed heritage behind Nemes Jeles’s controversial masterpiece, a trend in Hungarian cinema that explores the crisis of masculinity in totalitarian political regimes, thereby performing an allegorical critique of modernity and modern subjectivity. My recontextualization of Nemes Jeles’s work indicates the ways it is influenced by a local, Eastern European filmmaking tradition (which includes the work of his own father, the filmmaker András Jeles as well), and is supported by three interrelated conceptual focus points: a post-Foucauldian understanding of cultural and cinematic space, an awareness of the workings of modern cinematic allegory, and finally the use of male protagonists as prime sites for the inscription of social crisis and historical trauma.","PeriodicalId":40721,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae-Film and Media Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausfm-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract As a result of its radical approach to the topic of the Holocaust, as well as due to the long list of prestigious prizes it won, Son of Saul (Saul fia, 2015, directed by László Nemes Jeles) has put the relation between Eastern European societies and totalitarianism in the centre of public and academic discourse. Though most reviews and articles placed the film in the history of Holocaust-representations, this is not the only context in which the film can be understood. In the present article I argue that Son of Saul can also be read outside (or at least at a distance from) the context of a Holocaust-film, as it also belongs to another, quite different and internationally much less known local cinematic canon. There is an unclaimed heritage behind Nemes Jeles’s controversial masterpiece, a trend in Hungarian cinema that explores the crisis of masculinity in totalitarian political regimes, thereby performing an allegorical critique of modernity and modern subjectivity. My recontextualization of Nemes Jeles’s work indicates the ways it is influenced by a local, Eastern European filmmaking tradition (which includes the work of his own father, the filmmaker András Jeles as well), and is supported by three interrelated conceptual focus points: a post-Foucauldian understanding of cultural and cinematic space, an awareness of the workings of modern cinematic allegory, and finally the use of male protagonists as prime sites for the inscription of social crisis and historical trauma.
《索尔之子》(Saul fia, 2015,由László Nemes Jeles执导)对大屠杀主题的激进处理,以及它获得的一长串著名奖项,使东欧社会与极权主义之间的关系成为公共和学术话语的中心。尽管大多数评论和文章都将这部电影置于大屠杀再现的历史中,但这并不是理解这部电影的唯一背景。在本文中,我认为《扫罗之子》也可以在大屠杀电影的背景之外(或至少远离)阅读,因为它也属于另一个完全不同的、在国际上鲜为人知的本土电影经典。在内梅斯·耶勒斯这部备受争议的杰作背后,有一份无人认领的遗产,这是匈牙利电影的一种趋势,它探讨了极权主义政治体制下的男子气概危机,从而对现代性和现代主体性进行了寓言式的批判。我对Nemes Jeles作品的重新语境化表明,它受到当地的东欧电影制作传统(包括他自己的父亲,电影制作人András Jeles的作品)的影响,并得到三个相互关联的概念焦点的支持:一种对文化和电影空间的后福柯式理解,一种对现代电影寓言运作的认识,最后是将男性主角作为社会危机和历史创伤的主要场所。