Nursing approach to the use of buttonhole and rope ladder cannulation of arteriovenous fistula based on a survey in Nigeria

M. Jared, V. Rajki
{"title":"Nursing approach to the use of buttonhole and rope ladder cannulation of arteriovenous fistula based on a survey in Nigeria","authors":"M. Jared, V. Rajki","doi":"10.1556/2066.2.2019.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The main purpose of this study is to examine the nursing aspect of two types of cannulation techniques and to investigate the outcomes of using cannulations on an arteriovenous fistula, as well as analysing their impact on outcome.\n \n \n \n Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire. Data were obtained from haemodialysis (HD) patients in Rivon Dialysis Centre in the city of Rivers State named Port Harcourt with over 60 HD patients and with over 15 HD nurses. Only 50 patients met the inclusive criteria after answering the questionnaire, 25 for rope ladder (RL) and 25 for buttonhole (BH) and 10 nurses chosen answered the questionnaire.\n \n \n \n This study revealed that patients who are using the BH cannulation technique reported a better outcome than the RL group patients. Patients reported lower occurrence of complication, for instance, out of 25 patients, 8 of them using the BH and 15 of them using the RL reported to have infection.\n \n \n \n Based on the results, it is possible to conclude that the patients who are cannulated with the RL cannulation technique have a higher risk of experiencing complications than the patients using the BH site cannulation technique.\n","PeriodicalId":52607,"journal":{"name":"Developments in Health Sciences","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2066.2.2019.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the nursing aspect of two types of cannulation techniques and to investigate the outcomes of using cannulations on an arteriovenous fistula, as well as analysing their impact on outcome. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire. Data were obtained from haemodialysis (HD) patients in Rivon Dialysis Centre in the city of Rivers State named Port Harcourt with over 60 HD patients and with over 15 HD nurses. Only 50 patients met the inclusive criteria after answering the questionnaire, 25 for rope ladder (RL) and 25 for buttonhole (BH) and 10 nurses chosen answered the questionnaire. This study revealed that patients who are using the BH cannulation technique reported a better outcome than the RL group patients. Patients reported lower occurrence of complication, for instance, out of 25 patients, 8 of them using the BH and 15 of them using the RL reported to have infection. Based on the results, it is possible to conclude that the patients who are cannulated with the RL cannulation technique have a higher risk of experiencing complications than the patients using the BH site cannulation technique.
钮扣眼和绳梯插管治疗尼日利亚动静脉瘘的护理体会
本研究的主要目的是检查两种类型的插管技术的护理方面,并调查在动静脉瘘上使用插管的结果,以及分析它们对结果的影响。数据收集使用自行开发的问卷。数据来自河州哈科特港市Rivon透析中心的血液透析(HD)患者,该中心有60多名HD患者和15多名HD护士。只有50例患者在回答问卷后符合纳入标准,绳梯(RL) 25例,扣眼(BH) 25例,选择10名护士回答了问卷。这项研究表明,使用BH插管技术的患者比RL组患者报告了更好的结果。患者报告并发症发生率较低,例如,在25名患者中,使用BH的8名患者和使用RL的15名患者报告有感染。基于这些结果,我们可以得出结论,使用RL插管技术的患者比使用BH部位插管技术的患者有更高的并发症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信