Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourse

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Dahlman, S. Just, Linea Munk Petersen, Prins Marcus Valiant Lantz, Nanna Würtz Kristiansen
{"title":"Datafied female health: Sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech in Danish public discourse","authors":"S. Dahlman, S. Just, Linea Munk Petersen, Prins Marcus Valiant Lantz, Nanna Würtz Kristiansen","doi":"10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digitalization of health promises individual empowerment while raising the threat of collective surveillance. Conceptualizing these threats and promises as sociotechnical imaginaries, we explore how issues of datafied female health are articulated in Danish public discourse. Empirically, we work with a large data set of Danish news media coverage of algorithmic technologies in the past 10 years (2011–2021). We locate coverage of female-oriented health technologies (or femtech) by using the data sprint methodology to track the emergence of such technologies as a topic of public concern. Across the data, we identify two broad sociotechnical imaginaries: one zooming in on individual uses of femtech, the other focusing on the collective benefits of public health initiatives. We conclude that sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech are increasingly entangled in everyday life, making female bodies knowable through algorithms and data. As such, female health becomes subject to instrumental rationality, not lived reality.","PeriodicalId":30110,"journal":{"name":"MedieKultur Journal of Media and Communication Research","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedieKultur Journal of Media and Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v39i74.133900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digitalization of health promises individual empowerment while raising the threat of collective surveillance. Conceptualizing these threats and promises as sociotechnical imaginaries, we explore how issues of datafied female health are articulated in Danish public discourse. Empirically, we work with a large data set of Danish news media coverage of algorithmic technologies in the past 10 years (2011–2021). We locate coverage of female-oriented health technologies (or femtech) by using the data sprint methodology to track the emergence of such technologies as a topic of public concern. Across the data, we identify two broad sociotechnical imaginaries: one zooming in on individual uses of femtech, the other focusing on the collective benefits of public health initiatives. We conclude that sociotechnical imaginaries of femtech are increasingly entangled in everyday life, making female bodies knowable through algorithms and data. As such, female health becomes subject to instrumental rationality, not lived reality.
数据化的女性健康:丹麦公共话语中女性技术的社会技术想象
健康的数字化承诺赋予个人权力,同时也增加了集体监视的威胁。将这些威胁和承诺概念化为社会技术想象,我们探讨了丹麦公共话语中如何阐述数据化的女性健康问题。在经验上,我们使用了过去10年(2011-2021年)丹麦新闻媒体对算法技术报道的大型数据集。我们通过使用数据冲刺方法来追踪作为公众关注主题的面向女性的卫生技术(或femtech)的出现,从而确定其覆盖范围。通过这些数据,我们确定了两种广泛的社会技术想象:一种是放大femtech的个人使用,另一种是关注公共卫生倡议的集体利益。我们的结论是,femtech的社会技术想象越来越多地与日常生活纠缠在一起,使女性身体通过算法和数据可知。因此,女性健康成为工具理性的对象,而不是生活现实的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信