Analysis of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration’s efficiency in the early diagnosis of non-central small cell lung cancer

Qianli Ma, Huanshun Wen, Tong Bao, Hongxiang Feng, Zhen-rong Zhang, Deruo Liu
{"title":"Analysis of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration’s efficiency in the early diagnosis of non-central small cell lung cancer","authors":"Qianli Ma, Huanshun Wen, Tong Bao, Hongxiang Feng, Zhen-rong Zhang, Deruo Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the early diagnosis of non-central small cell lung cancer. \n \n \nMethods \n141 patients wereselected from July 1999 to June 2017, who were diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (stage N2 and N3). They were divided into two groups according to the approach of obtaining histopathological tissuefor diagnosis.49 cases in the experimental group were obtained by EBUS-TBNA, 92 cases in the control group were done by video assisted thoracic surgery (40 cases, 43.5%), mediastinoscopy (1 case, 1.1%), and open procedure (51 case, 55.4%). Survival outcome, time of waiting for the treatment and lengthof stay were analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThere were109 males, 32 females, the range of age is from 16 to 79 years old[(56.21±11.48)years]. 62 lesions located in the upper lobe, 12 in the middle lobe, 56 in the lower lobe, 11 in the middle-lower/-upper lobes. Considering the T stage, there are 7 cases of T1, 61 cases of T2, 45 cases of T3, and 26cases of T4, 2 patients with Tx stage.Compared with conventional approach, EBUS-TBNA saved 10.78 days from admission to the time of receiving treatment [(4.62±0.66)days vs. (15.40±1.61)days, P<0.05], and saved 18.13 days of length of stay [(5.30±0.76)days vs. (23.43±2.44)days, P<0.05]. 5-year survival rate was 31.0% for traditional group and 27.5% for EBUS-TBNA group, there was no significant difference between two groups(P=0.308). \n \n \nConclusion \nEBUS-TBNA couldsave the waiting days from admission to the time of receiving treatment, and also shorten the total length of stay. EBUS-TBNA was more efficient than conventional approaches (VATS, mediastinoscopy or open procedure) for diagnosing non-central small cell lung cancer with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. \n \n \nKey words: \nSmall cell lung cancer; Diagnosis, fenl; EBUS-TBNA","PeriodicalId":10181,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovaescular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-4497.2019.08.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the early diagnosis of non-central small cell lung cancer. Methods 141 patients wereselected from July 1999 to June 2017, who were diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (stage N2 and N3). They were divided into two groups according to the approach of obtaining histopathological tissuefor diagnosis.49 cases in the experimental group were obtained by EBUS-TBNA, 92 cases in the control group were done by video assisted thoracic surgery (40 cases, 43.5%), mediastinoscopy (1 case, 1.1%), and open procedure (51 case, 55.4%). Survival outcome, time of waiting for the treatment and lengthof stay were analyzed. Results There were109 males, 32 females, the range of age is from 16 to 79 years old[(56.21±11.48)years]. 62 lesions located in the upper lobe, 12 in the middle lobe, 56 in the lower lobe, 11 in the middle-lower/-upper lobes. Considering the T stage, there are 7 cases of T1, 61 cases of T2, 45 cases of T3, and 26cases of T4, 2 patients with Tx stage.Compared with conventional approach, EBUS-TBNA saved 10.78 days from admission to the time of receiving treatment [(4.62±0.66)days vs. (15.40±1.61)days, P<0.05], and saved 18.13 days of length of stay [(5.30±0.76)days vs. (23.43±2.44)days, P<0.05]. 5-year survival rate was 31.0% for traditional group and 27.5% for EBUS-TBNA group, there was no significant difference between two groups(P=0.308). Conclusion EBUS-TBNA couldsave the waiting days from admission to the time of receiving treatment, and also shorten the total length of stay. EBUS-TBNA was more efficient than conventional approaches (VATS, mediastinoscopy or open procedure) for diagnosing non-central small cell lung cancer with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. Key words: Small cell lung cancer; Diagnosis, fenl; EBUS-TBNA
超声引导下经支气管针吸在非中心小细胞肺癌早期诊断中的价值分析
目的探讨超声引导下经支气管针吸在非中心小细胞肺癌早期诊断中的价值。方法选取1999年7月至2017年6月诊断为小细胞肺癌(N2期和N3期)的141例患者。根据获得组织病理组织诊断的方式分为两组。实验组49例采用EBUS-TBNA,对照组92例采用视频辅助胸外科手术(40例,43.5%)、纵隔镜检查(1例,1.1%)、开腹手术(51例,55.4%)。分析两组患者的生存结局、等待治疗时间及住院时间。结果男性109例,女性32例,年龄16 ~ 79岁[(56.21±11.48)岁]。62例位于上肺叶,12例位于中肺叶,56例位于下肺叶,11例位于中下/上肺叶。从T分期来看,T1 7例,T2 61例,T3 45例,T4 26例,Tx期2例。与常规方法相比,EBUS-TBNA从入院到接受治疗时间缩短10.78天[(4.62±0.66)天比(15.40±1.61)天,P<0.05],缩短住院时间18.13天[(5.30±0.76)天比(23.43±2.44)天,P<0.05]。传统组5年生存率为31.0%,EBUS-TBNA组5年生存率为27.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.308)。结论EBUS-TBNA可缩短患者从入院到接受治疗的等待时间,缩短总住院时间。EBUS-TBNA比传统方法(VATS、纵隔镜检查或开放手术)更有效地诊断非中央小细胞肺癌伴纵隔淋巴结肿大。关键词:小细胞肺癌;诊断、fenl;EBUS-TBNA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信