Venture Capital, the Right Mix!

Shomaila L. Maker
{"title":"Venture Capital, the Right Mix!","authors":"Shomaila L. Maker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3463776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is, surprisingly, a paucity of current (American) academic literature on why certain capital markets have been more conducive to the growth of venture-capital, whereas in other (advanced) capital markets venture-capital has not been able to secure a foothold. Writing almost two decades ago, Gilson suggested a link between an active stock market and a strong venture-capital market. A different viewpoint was presented by Curtis Milhaupt in his article published in 1997, where he explored the linkage between corporate governance and innovation by examining the legal rules and institutional settings in Japan and the US for venture-capital. For Milhaupt, the differences between the US and Japanese venture-capital markets could not be explained simply as a function of market liquidity, and depended on the different corporate governance characteristics of the two systems. Fast forward to 2019, and whilst venture-capital investment in Japan continues to remain low, Germany (a bank-centered capital market system) is the new hot-bed for venture-capital activity. This article explores both Gilson's and Milhaupt's viewpoints and presents an alternative explanation. As growth of venture-capital in India and Germany have shown, so long as there is a conducive environment for a pool of entrepreneurial talent to develop (be it because of proximity of educational institutions such as the IITs in India, or because of affordability and hip sub-culture, as in Berlin), there is fodder for venture-capitalists for spurring innovative enterprise.","PeriodicalId":11881,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3463776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is, surprisingly, a paucity of current (American) academic literature on why certain capital markets have been more conducive to the growth of venture-capital, whereas in other (advanced) capital markets venture-capital has not been able to secure a foothold. Writing almost two decades ago, Gilson suggested a link between an active stock market and a strong venture-capital market. A different viewpoint was presented by Curtis Milhaupt in his article published in 1997, where he explored the linkage between corporate governance and innovation by examining the legal rules and institutional settings in Japan and the US for venture-capital. For Milhaupt, the differences between the US and Japanese venture-capital markets could not be explained simply as a function of market liquidity, and depended on the different corporate governance characteristics of the two systems. Fast forward to 2019, and whilst venture-capital investment in Japan continues to remain low, Germany (a bank-centered capital market system) is the new hot-bed for venture-capital activity. This article explores both Gilson's and Milhaupt's viewpoints and presents an alternative explanation. As growth of venture-capital in India and Germany have shown, so long as there is a conducive environment for a pool of entrepreneurial talent to develop (be it because of proximity of educational institutions such as the IITs in India, or because of affordability and hip sub-culture, as in Berlin), there is fodder for venture-capitalists for spurring innovative enterprise.
风险投资,正确的组合!
令人惊讶的是,为什么某些资本市场更有利于风险资本的增长,而在其他(先进的)资本市场,风险资本却无法站稳脚跟,目前(美国)的学术文献却很少。吉尔森在近20年前的一篇文章中提出,活跃的股市与强劲的风险资本市场之间存在联系。柯蒂斯·米豪普特(Curtis Milhaupt)在1997年发表的一篇文章中提出了不同的观点,他通过研究日本和美国风险资本的法律规则和制度设置,探讨了公司治理与创新之间的联系。在Milhaupt看来,美国和日本风险投资市场的差异不能简单地解释为市场流动性的函数,而是取决于两种制度不同的公司治理特征。快进到2019年,虽然日本的风险资本投资仍然很低,但德国(以银行为中心的资本市场体系)是风险资本活动的新温床。本文探讨了Gilson和Milhaupt的观点,并提出了另一种解释。正如风险资本在印度和德国的增长所表明的那样,只要有一个有利于创业人才发展的环境(无论是因为教育机构的临近,比如印度的iit,还是因为负担得起和时髦的亚文化,比如柏林),就有风险资本家刺激创新企业的素材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信