Automations in Chemostratigraphy: Toward Robust Chemical Data Analysis and Interpretation

N. Michael, C. Scheibe, N. Craigie
{"title":"Automations in Chemostratigraphy: Toward Robust Chemical Data Analysis and Interpretation","authors":"N. Michael, C. Scheibe, N. Craigie","doi":"10.2118/204892-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Elemental chemostratigraphy has become an established stratigraphic correlation technique over the last 15 years. Geochemical data are generated from rock samples (e.g., ditch cuttings, cores or hand specimens) for up to c. 50 elements in the range Na-U in the periodic table using various analytical techniques. The data are commonly displayed and interpreted as ratios, indices and proxy values in profile form against depth. The large number of possible combinations between the determined elements (more than a thousand combinations), makes it a time-consuming effort to identify meaningful variations that resulted in correlative chemostratigraphic boundaries and zones between wells. The large number of combination means that 30-40% of the information is not used for the correlations that maybe crucial to understand the geological processes. Automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are envisaged as likely solutions to this challenge.\n Statistical and machine learning techniques are tested as a first step to automate and establish a workflow to define (chemo-) stratigraphic boundaries, and to identify geological formations. The workflow commences with a quality check of the input data and then with principle component analysis (PCA) as a multivariate statistical method. PCA is used to minimize the number of elements/ratios plotted in profile form, whilst simultaneously identifying multidimensional relationships between them. A statistical boundary picking method is then applied define chemostratigraphic zones, for which reliability is determined utilizing quartile analysis, which tests the overlap of chemical signals across these statistical boundaries. Machine learning via discriminant function analysis (DFA) has been developed to predict the placement of correlative boundaries between adjacent sections/wells.\n The proposed workflow has been tested on various geological formations and areas in Saudi Arabia. The chemostratigraphic correlations proposed using this workflow broadly correspond to those defined in the standard workflow by experienced chemostratigraphers, while interpretation times and subjectivity are reduced.\n While machine learning via DFA is currently further researched, early results of the workflow are very encouraging. A user-friendly software application with workflows and algorithms ultimately leading to automation of the processes is under development.","PeriodicalId":11024,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204892-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elemental chemostratigraphy has become an established stratigraphic correlation technique over the last 15 years. Geochemical data are generated from rock samples (e.g., ditch cuttings, cores or hand specimens) for up to c. 50 elements in the range Na-U in the periodic table using various analytical techniques. The data are commonly displayed and interpreted as ratios, indices and proxy values in profile form against depth. The large number of possible combinations between the determined elements (more than a thousand combinations), makes it a time-consuming effort to identify meaningful variations that resulted in correlative chemostratigraphic boundaries and zones between wells. The large number of combination means that 30-40% of the information is not used for the correlations that maybe crucial to understand the geological processes. Automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are envisaged as likely solutions to this challenge. Statistical and machine learning techniques are tested as a first step to automate and establish a workflow to define (chemo-) stratigraphic boundaries, and to identify geological formations. The workflow commences with a quality check of the input data and then with principle component analysis (PCA) as a multivariate statistical method. PCA is used to minimize the number of elements/ratios plotted in profile form, whilst simultaneously identifying multidimensional relationships between them. A statistical boundary picking method is then applied define chemostratigraphic zones, for which reliability is determined utilizing quartile analysis, which tests the overlap of chemical signals across these statistical boundaries. Machine learning via discriminant function analysis (DFA) has been developed to predict the placement of correlative boundaries between adjacent sections/wells. The proposed workflow has been tested on various geological formations and areas in Saudi Arabia. The chemostratigraphic correlations proposed using this workflow broadly correspond to those defined in the standard workflow by experienced chemostratigraphers, while interpretation times and subjectivity are reduced. While machine learning via DFA is currently further researched, early results of the workflow are very encouraging. A user-friendly software application with workflows and algorithms ultimately leading to automation of the processes is under development.
化学地层学中的自动化:迈向稳健的化学数据分析与解释
元素化学地层学在过去的15年中已经成为一种成熟的地层对比技术。地球化学数据来自岩石样品(例如,沟岩屑,岩心或手标本),使用各种分析技术,在元素周期表中Na-U范围内最多可达50种元素。数据通常以剖面形式显示和解释为与深度相关的比率、指数和代理值。已知元素之间的大量可能组合(超过一千种组合)使得识别有意义的变化非常耗时,这些变化导致了井间相关的化学地层边界和带。大量的组合意味着30-40%的信息没有被用于可能对理解地质过程至关重要的相关性。自动化和人工智能(AI)被认为是应对这一挑战的可能解决方案。统计和机器学习技术作为自动化和建立工作流程的第一步进行测试,以定义(化学)地层边界,并识别地质构造。工作流从输入数据的质量检查开始,然后使用主成分分析(PCA)作为多变量统计方法。PCA用于最小化以剖面形式绘制的元素/比率的数量,同时识别它们之间的多维关系。然后应用统计边界选取方法来定义化学地层带,其可靠性是利用四分位数分析来确定的,该分析测试了化学信号在这些统计边界上的重叠。通过判别函数分析(DFA)的机器学习已被开发用于预测相邻剖面/井之间相关边界的位置。提出的工作流程已在沙特阿拉伯的各种地质构造和地区进行了测试。使用该工作流程提出的化学地层对比与经验丰富的化学地层学家在标准工作流程中定义的化学地层对比大致对应,同时减少了解释时间和主观性。虽然通过DFA进行的机器学习目前还在进一步研究中,但工作流程的早期结果非常令人鼓舞。一个用户友好的软件应用程序的工作流程和算法最终导致自动化的过程正在开发中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信