Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Model Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question (TTMCQ) pada Materi Pancadharma

M. Singamurti
{"title":"Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Model Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question (TTMCQ) pada Materi Pancadharma","authors":"M. Singamurti","doi":"10.18326/infsl3.v14i1.97-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop a Two Tier Multiple Choice Question Assessment instrument that is suitable for use in Pancadharma material and to find out the teachers and students’ responses to the instrument developed. This study was conducted using the RD method applying the steps from Borg and Gall. The locations of the study were at the State Junior High Schools 1 and 2 Keling in Jepara Regency. Data collection used questionnaires, test, interviews and documentation. The results of this study exhibited that the TTMCQ assessment instrument developed for the Pancadharma material had 92.22% of content validation; the reliability scores were 0.754 for first tier and 0.826 for two tier; the power of distinguishing questions was categorized into a good category with the percentage of 66.67% for the main questions, and 46.66% for the reason questions. The difficulty level test indicated that 40% of the multiple choice questions were easy and 53.33% of them were medium, and 60% of the reason questions were easy, and 33.33% of them were medium. The teachers and students’ responses to the TTMCQ instrument developed in the form of multiple-choice multiple-level questions were more complicated than those of regular multiple-choice questions; the form of the questions was good and neatly organized; and the form of the questions was more about children’s responsibility in terms of thinking and solving problems. Thus, the TTMCQ instrument that had been developed was included in the appropriate category to be used as an assessment instrument of the Pancadharma material.","PeriodicalId":31274,"journal":{"name":"Inferensi Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inferensi Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v14i1.97-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a Two Tier Multiple Choice Question Assessment instrument that is suitable for use in Pancadharma material and to find out the teachers and students’ responses to the instrument developed. This study was conducted using the RD method applying the steps from Borg and Gall. The locations of the study were at the State Junior High Schools 1 and 2 Keling in Jepara Regency. Data collection used questionnaires, test, interviews and documentation. The results of this study exhibited that the TTMCQ assessment instrument developed for the Pancadharma material had 92.22% of content validation; the reliability scores were 0.754 for first tier and 0.826 for two tier; the power of distinguishing questions was categorized into a good category with the percentage of 66.67% for the main questions, and 46.66% for the reason questions. The difficulty level test indicated that 40% of the multiple choice questions were easy and 53.33% of them were medium, and 60% of the reason questions were easy, and 33.33% of them were medium. The teachers and students’ responses to the TTMCQ instrument developed in the form of multiple-choice multiple-level questions were more complicated than those of regular multiple-choice questions; the form of the questions was good and neatly organized; and the form of the questions was more about children’s responsibility in terms of thinking and solving problems. Thus, the TTMCQ instrument that had been developed was included in the appropriate category to be used as an assessment instrument of the Pancadharma material.
本研究旨在开发一个适用于Pancadharma教材的两层选择题评估工具,并了解教师和学生对开发的工具的反应。本研究采用Borg和Gall的步骤,采用RD方法进行。这项研究的地点是在杰帕拉县的第一和第二国立初级中学。数据收集采用问卷调查,测试,访谈和文件。结果表明:所开发的TTMCQ评价工具对Pancadharma原料的含量验证率为92.22%;第一层的信度得分为0.754,两层的信度得分为0.826;区分问题的能力被归为较好的一类,主要问题的比例为66.67%,原因问题的比例为46.66%。难度等级测试显示,选择题中40%为易题,53.33%为中题;原因题中60%为易题,33.33%为中题。教师和学生对以选择题形式开发的TTMCQ工具的回答比常规选择题的回答更复杂;问题的形式很好,组织得很整齐;问题的形式更多的是关于孩子在思考和解决问题方面的责任。因此,已开发的TTMCQ工具被列入适当类别,用作Pancadharma材料的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信