Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a text messaging intervention to reduce high-risk alcohol use among adults 50 and older: an exploratory study

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
A. Kuerbis, S. Behrendt, V. Arora, Frederick J Muench
{"title":"Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a text messaging intervention to reduce high-risk alcohol use among adults 50 and older: an exploratory study","authors":"A. Kuerbis, S. Behrendt, V. Arora, Frederick J Muench","doi":"10.1108/add-11-2021-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPrevalence rates of older adults (OA, 50+) with high-risk alcohol use are rapidly growing. Barriers to intervention persist for OA. Mobile interventions, specifically short message service (SMS, also known as text messaging), provide an opportunity to overcome such barriers. The purpose of this paper is to explore the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of four SMS intervention conditions compared to mobile assessment only among OA (50–65 years old, n = 49) who drink at high-risk levels compared to younger adults (YA, 21–49 years old, n = 102).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nWithin and between age group differences at baseline and end-of-treatment (12 weeks) were explored. Generalized linear modeling was used to test age by receipt of any SMS intervention (compared to assessment only) effects across health outcomes. Effect sizes and visual analyses were generated to assess for age by type of SMS interactions.\n\n\nFindings\nBoth age groups reported intervention satisfaction. Two-thirds elected to continue receiving SMSs after treatment concluded. Descriptively, SMS groups demonstrated reduced drinking across age groups at end-of-treatment compared to mobile assessment only, though slightly larger effects were found for YA than for OA. Age significantly moderated the receipt of any SMS intervention only for depression (i.e., older age weakened the therapeutic effect). Of all the SMS types, tailored messages outperformed the other conditions on drinking outcomes for both age groups. Depression, craving and alcohol problems responded to gain-framed messages among OA and loss-framed messages among YA.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings of this paper suggest that SMS is acceptable and potentially effective across age groups. Further adaptation of SMS across age groups could enhance its effectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first paper to explore the impact of older age on the efficacy of text messaging as an intervention for hazardous alcohol use.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-11-2021-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Prevalence rates of older adults (OA, 50+) with high-risk alcohol use are rapidly growing. Barriers to intervention persist for OA. Mobile interventions, specifically short message service (SMS, also known as text messaging), provide an opportunity to overcome such barriers. The purpose of this paper is to explore the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of four SMS intervention conditions compared to mobile assessment only among OA (50–65 years old, n = 49) who drink at high-risk levels compared to younger adults (YA, 21–49 years old, n = 102). Design/methodology/approach Within and between age group differences at baseline and end-of-treatment (12 weeks) were explored. Generalized linear modeling was used to test age by receipt of any SMS intervention (compared to assessment only) effects across health outcomes. Effect sizes and visual analyses were generated to assess for age by type of SMS interactions. Findings Both age groups reported intervention satisfaction. Two-thirds elected to continue receiving SMSs after treatment concluded. Descriptively, SMS groups demonstrated reduced drinking across age groups at end-of-treatment compared to mobile assessment only, though slightly larger effects were found for YA than for OA. Age significantly moderated the receipt of any SMS intervention only for depression (i.e., older age weakened the therapeutic effect). Of all the SMS types, tailored messages outperformed the other conditions on drinking outcomes for both age groups. Depression, craving and alcohol problems responded to gain-framed messages among OA and loss-framed messages among YA. Research limitations/implications The findings of this paper suggest that SMS is acceptable and potentially effective across age groups. Further adaptation of SMS across age groups could enhance its effectiveness. Originality/value This is the first paper to explore the impact of older age on the efficacy of text messaging as an intervention for hazardous alcohol use.
一项探索性研究:短信干预在50岁及以上成年人中减少高风险酒精使用的可接受性和初步有效性
目的:老年人(OA, 50岁以上)高危饮酒的患病率正在迅速上升。OA的干预障碍依然存在。移动干预措施,特别是短消息服务(SMS,也称为文本信息),为克服这些障碍提供了机会。本文的目的是探讨与仅移动评估相比,饮酒处于高危水平的OA(50-65岁,n = 49)与年轻人(YA, 21-49岁,n = 102)相比,四种SMS干预条件的可接受性和初步有效性。设计/方法学/方法:探讨各组内和组间基线和治疗结束时(12周)的差异。使用广义线性模型通过接受任何SMS干预(与仅评估相比)来测试年龄对健康结果的影响。产生效应量和可视化分析,以评估按SMS交互类型的年龄。两个年龄组都报告了干预的满意度。三分之二的人选择在治疗结束后继续接受短信。描述性地说,与移动评估相比,短信组在治疗结束时显示出跨年龄组饮酒减少,尽管YA的效果略大于OA。年龄显著减缓了任何SMS干预的接受,仅针对抑郁症(即,年龄较大削弱了治疗效果)。在所有短信类型中,定制短信对两个年龄组的饮酒结果都优于其他条件。抑郁、渴望和酒精问题与OA中的增益框架信息和YA中的损失框架信息有关。研究局限/启示本论文的研究结果表明,短信是可以接受的,并且在各个年龄段都可能有效。短信在不同年龄组之间的进一步适应可以提高其有效性。原创性/价值这是第一篇探讨年龄对短信作为危险饮酒干预效果影响的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信