{"title":"Advanced configurations for very large transport airplanes","authors":"John H. McMasters , Ilan M. Kroo","doi":"10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00018-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent aerospace industry interest in developing subsonic commercial transport airplanes with at least 50% greater passenger capacity than the largest existing aircraft in this category (e.g. the Boeing 747-400 with approximately 400–450 seats) has generated a number of proposals based primarily on the configuration paradigm established 50 years ago with the Boeing B-47 bomber. While this classic configuration has come to dominate subsonic commercial airplane development since the advent of the Boeing 707/Douglas DC-8 in the mid-1950s, its extrapolation to the size required to carry more than 600–700 passengers raises a number of questions, including:</p><ul><li><span>1. </span><span><p>How large can an airplane of 707/747 configuration be built and still remain economically and operationally viable?</p></span></li><li><span>2. </span><span><p>What configuration alternatives might allow circumvention of practical size limitations inherent in the basic 707/747 configuration?</p></span></li><li><span>3. </span><span><p>What new and/or dormant technology elements might be brought together in synergistic ways to resolve or ameliorate very large subsonic airplane problems?</p></span></li></ul>\n<p>To explore these and a number of related issues, a team of Boeing, university and NASA engineers was formed under the auspices of the NASA Advanced Concepts Program during 1994. The results of a Research Analysis contract (NAS1-20269) focused on a large, unconventional (C-wing) transport configuration for which Boeing and the authors were granted a design patent in 1995 is the subject of this paper which is based on information contained in McMasters et al. (NASA CR 198351, October 1996).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100070,"journal":{"name":"Aircraft Design","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 217-242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00018-4","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aircraft Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369886998000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63
Abstract
Recent aerospace industry interest in developing subsonic commercial transport airplanes with at least 50% greater passenger capacity than the largest existing aircraft in this category (e.g. the Boeing 747-400 with approximately 400–450 seats) has generated a number of proposals based primarily on the configuration paradigm established 50 years ago with the Boeing B-47 bomber. While this classic configuration has come to dominate subsonic commercial airplane development since the advent of the Boeing 707/Douglas DC-8 in the mid-1950s, its extrapolation to the size required to carry more than 600–700 passengers raises a number of questions, including:
1.
How large can an airplane of 707/747 configuration be built and still remain economically and operationally viable?
2.
What configuration alternatives might allow circumvention of practical size limitations inherent in the basic 707/747 configuration?
3.
What new and/or dormant technology elements might be brought together in synergistic ways to resolve or ameliorate very large subsonic airplane problems?
To explore these and a number of related issues, a team of Boeing, university and NASA engineers was formed under the auspices of the NASA Advanced Concepts Program during 1994. The results of a Research Analysis contract (NAS1-20269) focused on a large, unconventional (C-wing) transport configuration for which Boeing and the authors were granted a design patent in 1995 is the subject of this paper which is based on information contained in McMasters et al. (NASA CR 198351, October 1996).