Impact of Debris Flows on Filter Barriers: Analysis Based on Site Monitoring Data

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
A. Leonardi, M. Pirulli, M. Barbero, F. Barpi, M. Borri-Brunetto, O. Pallara, C. Scavia, V. Segor
{"title":"Impact of Debris Flows on Filter Barriers: Analysis Based on Site Monitoring Data","authors":"A. Leonardi, M. Pirulli, M. Barbero, F. Barpi, M. Borri-Brunetto, O. Pallara, C. Scavia, V. Segor","doi":"10.2113/EEG-D-20-00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Debris flows are one of the most complex and devastating natural phenomena, and they affect mountainous areas throughout the world. Structural measures are currently adopted to mitigate the related hazard in urbanized areas. However, their design requires an estimate of the impact force, which is an open issue. The numerous formulae proposed in the literature require the assignment of empirical coefficients and an evaluation of the kinematic characteristics of the incoming flow. Both are generally not known a priori. In this article, we present the Grand Valey torrent site (Italian Alps). A monitoring system made up of strain gauges was installed on a filter barrier at the site, allowing the evaluation of impact forces. The system provides pivotal information for calibrating impact formulae. Two debris flows occurred during the monitoring period. We present the interpretation of videos, impact measurements, and the results of numerical analyses. The combined analysis allows a back calculation of the events in terms of forces, flow depth, and velocity. Thus, we investigate the applicability of the impact formulae suggested in the literature and of the recommended empirical coefficients. The results highlight that hydrostatic effects dominated the impact during the first event, while hydrodynamic effects prevailed in the second one.","PeriodicalId":50518,"journal":{"name":"Environmental & Engineering Geoscience","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental & Engineering Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/EEG-D-20-00013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Debris flows are one of the most complex and devastating natural phenomena, and they affect mountainous areas throughout the world. Structural measures are currently adopted to mitigate the related hazard in urbanized areas. However, their design requires an estimate of the impact force, which is an open issue. The numerous formulae proposed in the literature require the assignment of empirical coefficients and an evaluation of the kinematic characteristics of the incoming flow. Both are generally not known a priori. In this article, we present the Grand Valey torrent site (Italian Alps). A monitoring system made up of strain gauges was installed on a filter barrier at the site, allowing the evaluation of impact forces. The system provides pivotal information for calibrating impact formulae. Two debris flows occurred during the monitoring period. We present the interpretation of videos, impact measurements, and the results of numerical analyses. The combined analysis allows a back calculation of the events in terms of forces, flow depth, and velocity. Thus, we investigate the applicability of the impact formulae suggested in the literature and of the recommended empirical coefficients. The results highlight that hydrostatic effects dominated the impact during the first event, while hydrodynamic effects prevailed in the second one.
泥石流对过滤屏障的影响:基于现场监测数据的分析
泥石流是最复杂和最具破坏性的自然现象之一,它影响着世界各地的山区。目前正在采取结构性措施减轻城市化地区的相关危害。然而,它们的设计需要估计冲击力,这是一个悬而未决的问题。文献中提出的许多公式都需要分配经验系数和评估来流的运动特性。两者通常都不是先天已知的。在这篇文章中,我们提出了大峡谷激流网站(意大利阿尔卑斯山)。在现场的过滤屏障上安装了一个由应变计组成的监测系统,可以评估冲击力。该系统为校正冲击公式提供了关键信息。监测期间共发生两次泥石流。我们介绍了视频的解释、影响测量和数值分析的结果。组合分析允许在力、流深和速度方面对事件进行反向计算。因此,我们研究了文献中建议的影响公式和推荐的经验系数的适用性。结果表明,在第一次撞击中,流体静力效应占主导地位,而在第二次撞击中,流体动力效应占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Environmental & Engineering Geoscience Journal publishes peer-reviewed manuscripts that address issues relating to the interaction of people with hydrologic and geologic systems. Theoretical and applied contributions are appropriate, and the primary criteria for acceptance are scientific and technical merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信