Salt Stress and Comparative Physiology in the Gramineae. I. Ion Relations of Two Salt- and Water-Stressed Barley Cultivars, California Mariout and Arimar

R. Storey, R. Jones
{"title":"Salt Stress and Comparative Physiology in the Gramineae. I. Ion Relations of Two Salt- and Water-Stressed Barley Cultivars, California Mariout and Arimar","authors":"R. Storey, R. Jones","doi":"10.1071/PP9780801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two barley cultivars, California Mariout and the somewhat more salt-sensitive Arimar, were grown under different salinity regimes and in isosmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. Shoot growth of both cultivars was inhibited more by NaCl than by PEG. The effects of various salt and osmotic stress regimes on the K+, Na+ and Cl- status, the fresh weight : dry weight ratio and osmotic potential of the tissue were determined. The changes in these parameters were dependent on the rate at which the stress was applied. A gradual increase in stress led to K+/Na+ exchange in the shoot so as to maintain an almost constant (K+ + Na+) content on a dry weight basis. Tissue dehydration largely accounted for the increase in osmotic pressure. In contrast, salt shock resulted in a rapid nonselective accumulation of salt. Both osmotic stress and shock similarly brought about a dehydration of shoot tissue. A gradual osmotic stress slightly enhanced K+ accumulation in the roots. The greater salt sensitivity of the Arimar cultivar appeared to be related to a poorer ability to regulate Na+ plus Cl- accumulation in shoots.","PeriodicalId":8650,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Plant Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9780801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

Abstract

Two barley cultivars, California Mariout and the somewhat more salt-sensitive Arimar, were grown under different salinity regimes and in isosmotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions. Shoot growth of both cultivars was inhibited more by NaCl than by PEG. The effects of various salt and osmotic stress regimes on the K+, Na+ and Cl- status, the fresh weight : dry weight ratio and osmotic potential of the tissue were determined. The changes in these parameters were dependent on the rate at which the stress was applied. A gradual increase in stress led to K+/Na+ exchange in the shoot so as to maintain an almost constant (K+ + Na+) content on a dry weight basis. Tissue dehydration largely accounted for the increase in osmotic pressure. In contrast, salt shock resulted in a rapid nonselective accumulation of salt. Both osmotic stress and shock similarly brought about a dehydration of shoot tissue. A gradual osmotic stress slightly enhanced K+ accumulation in the roots. The greater salt sensitivity of the Arimar cultivar appeared to be related to a poorer ability to regulate Na+ plus Cl- accumulation in shoots.
禾本科植物的盐胁迫与比较生理学。1 .两个盐胁迫和水分胁迫大麦品种的离子关系
两种大麦品种,加利福尼亚马里奥特和对盐更敏感的阿利马,在不同的盐度制度和等渗聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液中生长。NaCl对两个品种茎部生长的抑制作用大于PEG。测定了不同盐胁迫和渗透胁迫对组织K+、Na+和Cl-状态、鲜干比和渗透势的影响。这些参数的变化取决于施加应力的速率。胁迫的逐渐增加导致茎部K+/Na+交换,使K+ + Na+含量在干重基础上保持几乎恒定。组织脱水是渗透压升高的主要原因。相反,盐冲击导致盐的快速非选择性积累。渗透胁迫和休克同样引起茎部组织脱水。逐渐的渗透胁迫略微促进了根系K+的积累。阿利玛品种对盐的敏感性越高,其对Na+ + Cl-积累的调节能力越弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信