Risk Management Approach: Drilling and Completion Projects

A. Ruzhnikov, Viktor Yurtaev
{"title":"Risk Management Approach: Drilling and Completion Projects","authors":"A. Ruzhnikov, Viktor Yurtaev","doi":"10.2118/206565-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This manuscript describes the approach in the risk management developed and implemented while operating 21 drilling rigs on 13 fields simultaneously in the Middle East, which resulted in 40% reduction of non-productive time. Well construction process requires a lot of attention on different levels and from different sides to ensure trouble-free execution. The bigger the volume of work, the higher the chance of a costly mistake.\n The risk management process was split in several steps, where different levels and divisions are involved. The Planning stage starts at engineering level and associated risk review goes to a level of Division Supervisor for every well, when special tools were developed to focus on potential high impact events. The Execution stage was covered by a set of Critical Activity reviews and Standard operation procedures, focusing on operations with highest risks or highest benefits. Further at the Evaluation stage every well was analyzed following the developed workflow, and further all obtained knowledge shared with every team member via custom designed dashboards.\n Shortly after initial steps were taken under the new risk management approach, one of main KPI – non-productive time (NPT) – started to decrease and dropped by 5% within one quarter. Further tuning of the process allowed to decrease NPT by over 40% with continuous positive trend. One of the main contributors is the re-focusing on the prevention measures during planning stage, which avoid non-conformance events with high impact. Simultaneously the approach unified the practices of different divisions and remove misalignment on most of the technical issues and questions. Additionally, it decreased the workload of the key field personnel, as reduced NPT gives more time to focus on continuous rig performance improvement.","PeriodicalId":11177,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, October 15, 2021","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, October 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206565-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This manuscript describes the approach in the risk management developed and implemented while operating 21 drilling rigs on 13 fields simultaneously in the Middle East, which resulted in 40% reduction of non-productive time. Well construction process requires a lot of attention on different levels and from different sides to ensure trouble-free execution. The bigger the volume of work, the higher the chance of a costly mistake. The risk management process was split in several steps, where different levels and divisions are involved. The Planning stage starts at engineering level and associated risk review goes to a level of Division Supervisor for every well, when special tools were developed to focus on potential high impact events. The Execution stage was covered by a set of Critical Activity reviews and Standard operation procedures, focusing on operations with highest risks or highest benefits. Further at the Evaluation stage every well was analyzed following the developed workflow, and further all obtained knowledge shared with every team member via custom designed dashboards. Shortly after initial steps were taken under the new risk management approach, one of main KPI – non-productive time (NPT) – started to decrease and dropped by 5% within one quarter. Further tuning of the process allowed to decrease NPT by over 40% with continuous positive trend. One of the main contributors is the re-focusing on the prevention measures during planning stage, which avoid non-conformance events with high impact. Simultaneously the approach unified the practices of different divisions and remove misalignment on most of the technical issues and questions. Additionally, it decreased the workload of the key field personnel, as reduced NPT gives more time to focus on continuous rig performance improvement.
风险管理方法:钻井和完井项目
本文描述了在中东地区13个油田同时运行21个钻井平台时开发和实施的风险管理方法,该方法使非生产时间减少了40%。井的施工过程需要从不同的层面和不同的角度进行大量的关注,以确保顺利进行。工作量越大,出现代价高昂的错误的可能性就越大。风险管理过程分为几个步骤,其中涉及不同的级别和部门。规划阶段从工程层面开始,相关的风险评估进入每口井的部门主管层面,然后开发出专门的工具来关注潜在的高影响事件。执行阶段由一组关键活动审查和标准操作程序覆盖,重点关注风险最高或收益最高的操作。在评估阶段,根据开发的工作流程对每口井进行分析,并通过定制设计的仪表板与每个团队成员共享所有知识。在采用新的风险管理方法后不久,主要KPI之一——非生产时间(NPT)开始下降,在一个季度内下降了5%。进一步的工艺调整使NPT降低了40%以上,并保持了持续的积极趋势。其中一个主要原因是计划阶段对预防措施的重新重视,避免了影响较大的不符合事件的发生。同时,该方法统一了不同部门的实践,并消除了在大多数技术问题上的不一致。此外,它还减少了关键现场人员的工作量,因为减少了NPT,使他们有更多的时间专注于钻机性能的持续改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信