European prescribers’ attitudes and beliefs on biologicals prescribing and automatic substitution

Pub Date : 2020-09-15 DOI:10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.020
M. Feldman, M. Reilly
{"title":"European prescribers’ attitudes and beliefs on biologicals prescribing and\n automatic substitution","authors":"M. Feldman, M. Reilly","doi":"10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The European Union (EU) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have\n led the development of a regulatory framework for biosimilars since 2004. By end of\n December 2019, 64 biosimilars of 15 originator biological medicines have a marketing\n authorization in Europe. Now, for the second time, the Alliance for Safe Biologic\n Medicines (ASBM) asked European prescribers for their views on the prescribing, adverse\n drug reaction reporting, automatic substitution and switching of biologicals and\n biosimilars. Methods: In March 2019, the ASBM surveyed 579 prescribers in France,\n Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and the UK. Prescribers were asked for their views on\n authority over prescribing and dispensing of biologicals/biosimilars, reporting\n biological/biosimilar use and adverse drug reactions (ADR) and switching. There were\n also questions related to their familiarity with, knowledge of, attitudes to, and\n beliefs in, biosimilars. Results: Since the previous European prescriber study conducted\n in 2013, the percentage of respondents considering themselves highly familiar with\n biosimilar medicines has increased from 76% to 90%. Four out of five prescribers said\n they are legally required to report ADR that are brought to their attention and they\n file detailed ADR reports taking 10‒20 minutes. Four out of five prescribers feel very\n strongly about having control over what is prescribed and dispensed to their patients.\n While highly comfortable prescribing biosimilars to naïve patients, physician comfort\n level decreased when switching a stable patient to a biosimilar. Comfort level decreased\n further when prescribers were asked about switching a patient to a biosimilar for\n non-medical reasons, e.g. cost, and further still if the switch is initiated by a third\n party. Conclusion: European physicians have increased their familiarity with biosimilars\n since the 2013 survey. Physicians increasingly believe they should always have control\n of treatment decisions including the decision to switch to a biosimilar. It was also\n highlighted that governments should make multiple therapeutic options available through\n tenders.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5639/gabij.2020.0903.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The European Union (EU) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have led the development of a regulatory framework for biosimilars since 2004. By end of December 2019, 64 biosimilars of 15 originator biological medicines have a marketing authorization in Europe. Now, for the second time, the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM) asked European prescribers for their views on the prescribing, adverse drug reaction reporting, automatic substitution and switching of biologicals and biosimilars. Methods: In March 2019, the ASBM surveyed 579 prescribers in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland and the UK. Prescribers were asked for their views on authority over prescribing and dispensing of biologicals/biosimilars, reporting biological/biosimilar use and adverse drug reactions (ADR) and switching. There were also questions related to their familiarity with, knowledge of, attitudes to, and beliefs in, biosimilars. Results: Since the previous European prescriber study conducted in 2013, the percentage of respondents considering themselves highly familiar with biosimilar medicines has increased from 76% to 90%. Four out of five prescribers said they are legally required to report ADR that are brought to their attention and they file detailed ADR reports taking 10‒20 minutes. Four out of five prescribers feel very strongly about having control over what is prescribed and dispensed to their patients. While highly comfortable prescribing biosimilars to naïve patients, physician comfort level decreased when switching a stable patient to a biosimilar. Comfort level decreased further when prescribers were asked about switching a patient to a biosimilar for non-medical reasons, e.g. cost, and further still if the switch is initiated by a third party. Conclusion: European physicians have increased their familiarity with biosimilars since the 2013 survey. Physicians increasingly believe they should always have control of treatment decisions including the decision to switch to a biosimilar. It was also highlighted that governments should make multiple therapeutic options available through tenders.
分享
查看原文
欧洲处方者对生物制剂处方和自动替代的态度和信念
自2004年以来,欧盟(EU)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)领导了生物仿制药监管框架的发展。截至2019年12月底,15种原研生物药物的64种生物仿制药在欧洲获得了上市许可。现在,安全生物药品联盟(ASBM)第二次向欧洲处方医师询问他们对处方、药物不良反应报告、生物制剂和生物仿制药的自动替代和切换的看法。方法:2019年3月,ASBM对法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、瑞士和英国的579名处方医师进行了调查。处方者被问及他们对生物制剂/生物类似药的处方和配药、报告生物/生物类似药的使用和药物不良反应(ADR)以及转换的权威的看法。还有一些问题与他们对生物仿制药的熟悉程度、知识、态度和信仰有关。结果:自2013年进行的上一次欧洲处方者研究以来,认为自己非常熟悉生物仿制药的受访者比例从76%增加到90%。五分之四的处方者表示,法律要求他们报告引起他们注意的不良反应,他们需要10-20分钟提交详细的不良反应报告。五分之四的开处方者非常强烈地认为自己可以控制给病人开的处方和配发的药物。虽然给naïve患者开生物仿制药非常舒服,但当将稳定的患者换成生物仿制药时,医生的舒适度降低了。当处方者被问及出于非医疗原因(如费用)将患者切换为生物仿制药时,舒适度进一步下降,如果切换是由第三方发起的,舒适度进一步下降。结论:自2013年调查以来,欧洲医生对生物仿制药的熟悉程度有所提高。医生们越来越相信他们应该始终拥有治疗决策的控制权,包括转向生物仿制药的决定。会议还强调,各国政府应通过招标提供多种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信