The anxiety level of healthcare professionals and hospital support staff during the COVID-19 pandemic

S. Salcan, Talat Ezmeci
{"title":"The anxiety level of healthcare professionals and hospital support staff during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"S. Salcan, Talat Ezmeci","doi":"10.28982/josam.7705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed a significant psychological burden on healthcare professionals. This study aims to identify the anxiety levels of healthcare professionals and non-healthcare personnel during the pandemic.\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on healthcare professionals during the pandemic, and we attempted to reach all personnel without setting a specific sample size. Participants completed a survey that included demographic information and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). We compared anxiety scores and working conditions between healthcare and non-healthcare personnel during the pandemic.\nResults: Our study included 204 personnel, with 45.1% being healthcare professionals and 54.9% non-healthcare professionals. The mean state anxiety score for all participants was 44.7 (10.3). Female professionals, those working in intensive care, and personnel who believed they lacked sufficient protection training had significantly higher mean anxiety scores (P=0.001, P=0.006, P<0.001, respectively). Participants with mild or no problems initiating and maintaining sleep and waking up early had lower mean anxiety scores (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between healthcare professionals and non-healthcare personnel in mean scores (P=0.59).\nConclusion: Our study found that all personnel experienced medium-level anxiety during the pandemic, indicating an increased risk for hospital staff. The fact that non-healthcare personnel had similar anxiety scores to healthcare professionals highlights the need for psychosocial interventions to support all hospital staff, regardless of their role in patient care.","PeriodicalId":30878,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.7705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed a significant psychological burden on healthcare professionals. This study aims to identify the anxiety levels of healthcare professionals and non-healthcare personnel during the pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on healthcare professionals during the pandemic, and we attempted to reach all personnel without setting a specific sample size. Participants completed a survey that included demographic information and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). We compared anxiety scores and working conditions between healthcare and non-healthcare personnel during the pandemic. Results: Our study included 204 personnel, with 45.1% being healthcare professionals and 54.9% non-healthcare professionals. The mean state anxiety score for all participants was 44.7 (10.3). Female professionals, those working in intensive care, and personnel who believed they lacked sufficient protection training had significantly higher mean anxiety scores (P=0.001, P=0.006, P<0.001, respectively). Participants with mild or no problems initiating and maintaining sleep and waking up early had lower mean anxiety scores (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between healthcare professionals and non-healthcare personnel in mean scores (P=0.59). Conclusion: Our study found that all personnel experienced medium-level anxiety during the pandemic, indicating an increased risk for hospital staff. The fact that non-healthcare personnel had similar anxiety scores to healthcare professionals highlights the need for psychosocial interventions to support all hospital staff, regardless of their role in patient care.
COVID-19大流行期间医疗保健专业人员和医院支持人员的焦虑水平
背景/目的:2019冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行给医护人员带来了沉重的心理负担。本研究旨在确定大流行期间卫生保健专业人员和非卫生保健人员的焦虑水平。方法:这项横断面研究是在大流行期间对卫生保健专业人员进行的,我们试图在没有设定特定样本量的情况下覆盖所有人员。参与者完成了一项调查,包括人口统计信息和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)。我们比较了大流行期间医护人员和非医护人员的焦虑评分和工作条件。结果:本研究共纳入204名人员,其中卫生专业人员占45.1%,非卫生专业人员占54.9%。所有参与者的平均状态焦虑得分为44.7(10.3)。女性专业人员、重症监护工作人员和认为自己缺乏足够保护培训的人员的平均焦虑得分显著高于女性专业人员(P=0.001, P=0.006, P<0.001)。开始和维持睡眠和早起有轻微或没有问题的参与者的平均焦虑评分较低(P<0.001)。医护人员与非医护人员的平均得分差异无统计学意义(P=0.59)。结论:我们的研究发现,在大流行期间,所有人员都经历了中等程度的焦虑,这表明医院工作人员的风险增加。非卫生保健人员的焦虑得分与卫生保健专业人员相似,这一事实突出表明,需要采取社会心理干预措施来支持所有医院工作人员,无论他们在病人护理中的作用如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信