Comparative Efficacy of Epley, Semont and Gans Maneuver in Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.

Q1 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Journal of Geophysical Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-04071-y
Shruti V Nadagoud, Vinay S Bhat, B S Pragathi
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Epley, Semont and Gans Maneuver in Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo.","authors":"Shruti V Nadagoud, Vinay S Bhat, B S Pragathi","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-04071-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacological therapies are used to control Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) symptoms for a brief period, discontinuing them usually results in recurrence. Canalolith repositioning maneuvers, including Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers, have been recommended for treating posterior canal BPPV with a high rate of success. A prospective, quasi-randomized study was carried out to compare the efficacy of Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers in the treatment of posterior canal BPPV and their durability. All patients over the age of 20 who met the BPPV diagnostic criteria, regardless of gender, were included in the study. Diagnosis of BPPV was done by Dix Hallpike maneuver. Typical posterior canal BPPV, the most frequent form of BPPV, is characterized by paroxysmal nystagmus evoked through the Dix-Hallpike test; the nystagmus is torsional clockwise for the left side, counter-clockwise for the right side, with a vertical up-beating component. The patients were uniformly quasi-randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to be treated with Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers. After performing the maneuver, the patients were again subjected to the Dix-Hallpike test. Based on the result of the Dix-Hallpike test's positivity, the maneuvers were repeated up to three times. All the patients were called for a reassessment 30 days after the last intervention to assess the durability of the maneuver. In the study, 54.44% (49) of the 90 patients were female, whereas 45.56% (41) were male. Overall, 83.33% (75) of patients required only one attempt, 15.56% (14) required two attempts, and 1.11% (1) required three attempts to improve. In the Epley maneuvers group, 86.66% (26) required only one attempt, 10% (3) required two attempts, and 3.33% (1) required three attempts. Similarly, 83.33% (25) required only one attempt in the Gans maneuvers group, and 16.67% (5) required two attempts. In Semont maneuver groups, 80% (24) required only one attempt, and 20% (6) required two attempts. The recurrence of the symptoms was seen in a total of 11 patients: 27.27% (3 patients) of the Epley maneuvers group, 36.36% (4 patients) of the Gans maneuvers group, and 36.36% (4 patients) of the Semont maneuvers group. All three maneuvers show equal efficacy in reducing vertigo. The Epley maneuver may be more relevant in the treatment of BPPV compared to others, considering the slightly higher improvement rate and the requirement for fewer attempts for the treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research","volume":"108 1","pages":"48-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10908675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-04071-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacological therapies are used to control Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) symptoms for a brief period, discontinuing them usually results in recurrence. Canalolith repositioning maneuvers, including Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers, have been recommended for treating posterior canal BPPV with a high rate of success. A prospective, quasi-randomized study was carried out to compare the efficacy of Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers in the treatment of posterior canal BPPV and their durability. All patients over the age of 20 who met the BPPV diagnostic criteria, regardless of gender, were included in the study. Diagnosis of BPPV was done by Dix Hallpike maneuver. Typical posterior canal BPPV, the most frequent form of BPPV, is characterized by paroxysmal nystagmus evoked through the Dix-Hallpike test; the nystagmus is torsional clockwise for the left side, counter-clockwise for the right side, with a vertical up-beating component. The patients were uniformly quasi-randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to be treated with Epley, Semont, and Gans maneuvers. After performing the maneuver, the patients were again subjected to the Dix-Hallpike test. Based on the result of the Dix-Hallpike test's positivity, the maneuvers were repeated up to three times. All the patients were called for a reassessment 30 days after the last intervention to assess the durability of the maneuver. In the study, 54.44% (49) of the 90 patients were female, whereas 45.56% (41) were male. Overall, 83.33% (75) of patients required only one attempt, 15.56% (14) required two attempts, and 1.11% (1) required three attempts to improve. In the Epley maneuvers group, 86.66% (26) required only one attempt, 10% (3) required two attempts, and 3.33% (1) required three attempts. Similarly, 83.33% (25) required only one attempt in the Gans maneuvers group, and 16.67% (5) required two attempts. In Semont maneuver groups, 80% (24) required only one attempt, and 20% (6) required two attempts. The recurrence of the symptoms was seen in a total of 11 patients: 27.27% (3 patients) of the Epley maneuvers group, 36.36% (4 patients) of the Gans maneuvers group, and 36.36% (4 patients) of the Semont maneuvers group. All three maneuvers show equal efficacy in reducing vertigo. The Epley maneuver may be more relevant in the treatment of BPPV compared to others, considering the slightly higher improvement rate and the requirement for fewer attempts for the treatment.

埃普利手法、塞蒙特手法和甘斯手法治疗后运河良性阵发性位置性眩晕的疗效比较。
药物疗法可在短期内控制良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)症状,停药后通常会复发。包括 Epley、Semont 和 Gans 手法在内的椎管结石复位手法被推荐用于治疗后方椎管 BPPV,成功率很高。为了比较 Epley、Semont 和 Gans 手法在治疗后管 BPPV 中的疗效及其持久性,我们开展了一项前瞻性准随机研究。所有符合 BPPV 诊断标准的 20 岁以上患者,不分性别,均被纳入研究范围。BPPV 的诊断是通过 Dix Hallpike 手法完成的。典型的后管型 BPPV 是 BPPV 的最常见形式,其特征是通过 Dix-Hallpike 试验诱发阵发性眼震;左侧眼震为顺时针扭转,右侧为逆时针扭转,并伴有垂直上跳成分。患者按 1:1:1 的比例统一准随机接受埃普利、塞蒙特和甘斯手法治疗。做完这些动作后,患者再次接受 Dix-Hallpike 试验。根据 Dix-Hallpike 试验的阳性结果,重复操作最多三次。在最后一次干预后的 30 天,所有患者都被要求进行复查,以评估手法的持久性。在这项研究中,90 名患者中有 54.44%(49 人)为女性,45.56%(41 人)为男性。总体而言,83.33%(75 人)的患者只需尝试一次,15.56%(14 人)的患者需要尝试两次,1.11%(1 人)的患者需要尝试三次才能改善病情。在 Epley 手法组中,86.66%(26 人)只需尝试一次,10%(3 人)需要尝试两次,3.33%(1 人)需要尝试三次。同样,在甘斯手法组中,83.33%(25 人)只需尝试一次,16.67%(5 人)需要尝试两次。在塞蒙特手法组中,80%(24 人)只需尝试一次,20%(6 人)需要尝试两次。共有 11 名患者的症状复发:埃普利手法组为 27.27%(3 名患者),甘斯手法组为 36.36%(4 名患者),塞蒙特手法组为 36.36%(4 名患者)。这三种手法在减轻眩晕方面的疗效相同。考虑到埃普利手法的改善率略高,且治疗所需尝试次数较少,因此与其他手法相比,埃普利手法可能更适合治疗 BPPV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research
Journal of Geophysical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR) publishes original scientific research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the understanding of the Earth, Sun, and solar system and all of their environments and components. JGR is currently organized into seven disciplinary sections (Atmospheres, Biogeosciences, Earth Surface, Oceans, Planets, Solid Earth, Space Physics). Sections may be added or combined in response to changes in the science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信