Small town, big risks: natural, cultural and social risk perception (Ciudad pequeña, grandes riesgos: percepción del riesgo natural, cultural y social)

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
João-Pedro Valente, Catarina Gouveia, M.I.S.C. Neves, Tatiana Vasques, F. Bernardo
{"title":"Small town, big risks: natural, cultural and social risk perception (Ciudad pequeña, grandes riesgos: percepción del riesgo natural, cultural y social)","authors":"João-Pedro Valente, Catarina Gouveia, M.I.S.C. Neves, Tatiana Vasques, F. Bernardo","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2020.1853946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Benavente (Portugal) is a small town which, compared to the rest of the country, has higher levels of the following three types of risks: earthquakes (natural risk), criminality (social risk) and the running of the bulls (cultural risk). This has allowed us to explore spatial bias, i.e., whether people have lower perceptions of risk at the local level than at the national or international levels, or if there are any risks strongly related with the local culture that show a different pattern. We also test whether risk perception dimensions identified by a psychometric paradigm relate to the three risk types that are highly prevalent in Benavente. The results support the spatial bias in relation to earthquakes and criminality but reveal a reverse pattern regarding the running of the bulls (cultural risk). The results also showed that people scored higher on the Dread dimension for earthquakes, followed by criminality, with lower scores in regard to the running of the bulls. The opposite was verified regarding the Control dimension.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"61 1","pages":"76 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2020.1853946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Benavente (Portugal) is a small town which, compared to the rest of the country, has higher levels of the following three types of risks: earthquakes (natural risk), criminality (social risk) and the running of the bulls (cultural risk). This has allowed us to explore spatial bias, i.e., whether people have lower perceptions of risk at the local level than at the national or international levels, or if there are any risks strongly related with the local culture that show a different pattern. We also test whether risk perception dimensions identified by a psychometric paradigm relate to the three risk types that are highly prevalent in Benavente. The results support the spatial bias in relation to earthquakes and criminality but reveal a reverse pattern regarding the running of the bulls (cultural risk). The results also showed that people scored higher on the Dread dimension for earthquakes, followed by criminality, with lower scores in regard to the running of the bulls. The opposite was verified regarding the Control dimension.
小城镇,大风险:自然、文化和社会风险感知
贝纳文特(葡萄牙)是一个小镇,与该国其他地区相比,以下三种风险的水平更高:地震(自然风险),犯罪(社会风险)和奔牛(文化风险)。这使我们能够探索空间偏差,即人们对地方层面的风险感知是否低于国家或国际层面,或者是否存在与当地文化密切相关的风险,但表现出不同的模式。我们还测试了由心理测量范式确定的风险感知维度是否与Benavente高度流行的三种风险类型相关。研究结果支持了地震和犯罪相关的空间偏差,但揭示了公牛奔跑(文化风险)的相反模式。研究结果还显示,人们对地震的恐惧维度得分较高,其次是犯罪,而对奔牛的恐惧维度得分较低。关于控制维度,验证了相反的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信