Dr. Anuradha Sen, Dr. Mukta Jitendra, Dr. Rajesh Mahajan, Dr. Jyoti Raina
{"title":"Comparative study of safety of Baska mask and Proseal LMA with respect to the oropharyngeal seal in a tertiary centre","authors":"Dr. Anuradha Sen, Dr. Mukta Jitendra, Dr. Rajesh Mahajan, Dr. Jyoti Raina","doi":"10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i3b.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Traditionally, endotracheal intubation has been the standard practice for administering general anaesthesia for most of the surgeries. Now a number of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) have been introduced in the clinical practice offering a simple and effective alternative to the endotracheal intubation, avoiding the use of laryngoscope to put the ETT (endotracheal tube) which is associated with exaggerated hemodynamic response. Method: The present prospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Jammu. After attaining approval of the Ethical committee of the Institute, present study included 90 patients of either gender ranging from 18 – 70 years, belonging to ASA grade I and II scheduled for elective surgery of less than 2 hours duration under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into Group P (PLMA) &Group B (Baska mask) of 45patients in each group. Result: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure for Group P and Group B was almost equal (30.1 ± 3.08 cm H 2 O vs 30.7 ± 2.59 cm H 2 O after 5 minutes and 30.4 ± 3.09 cm H 2 O vs 31.6 ± 2.55 cm H 2 O after 30 minutes of device placement respectively). Conclusion: Oropharyngeal seal provided by the Baska mask is comparable with that of Proseal LMA with no difference in postoperative oropharyngeal morbidity.","PeriodicalId":14146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i3b.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Traditionally, endotracheal intubation has been the standard practice for administering general anaesthesia for most of the surgeries. Now a number of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) have been introduced in the clinical practice offering a simple and effective alternative to the endotracheal intubation, avoiding the use of laryngoscope to put the ETT (endotracheal tube) which is associated with exaggerated hemodynamic response. Method: The present prospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Government Medical College, Jammu. After attaining approval of the Ethical committee of the Institute, present study included 90 patients of either gender ranging from 18 – 70 years, belonging to ASA grade I and II scheduled for elective surgery of less than 2 hours duration under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into Group P (PLMA) &Group B (Baska mask) of 45patients in each group. Result: Mean oropharyngeal leak pressure for Group P and Group B was almost equal (30.1 ± 3.08 cm H 2 O vs 30.7 ± 2.59 cm H 2 O after 5 minutes and 30.4 ± 3.09 cm H 2 O vs 31.6 ± 2.55 cm H 2 O after 30 minutes of device placement respectively). Conclusion: Oropharyngeal seal provided by the Baska mask is comparable with that of Proseal LMA with no difference in postoperative oropharyngeal morbidity.
背景:传统上,气管内插管一直是大多数手术中给予全身麻醉的标准做法。目前,许多声门上气道装置(SAD)已被引入临床实践,为气管插管提供了一种简单有效的替代方法,避免了使用喉镜置入气管内插管时血流动力学反应过大的问题。方法:前瞻性比较研究在查谟政府医学院麻醉与重症监护科进行。经研究所伦理委员会批准,本研究纳入90例患者,男女不限,年龄在18 - 70岁之间,属于ASA I级和II级,计划在全身麻醉下进行持续时间少于2小时的择期手术。将患者随机分为P组(PLMA)和B组(Baska mask),每组45例。结果:P组和B组的平均口咽漏压基本相等(放置5min后分别为30.1±3.08 cm h2o vs 30.7±2.59 cm h2o,放置30min后分别为30.4±3.09 cm h2o vs 31.6±2.55 cm h2o)。结论:Baska面罩提供的口咽密封与Proseal LMA相当,术后口咽发病率无差异。