ISLAMIC BANKING MARKET DISCIPLINE IN INDONESIA

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Joko Suliyono, T. Risfandy
{"title":"ISLAMIC BANKING MARKET DISCIPLINE IN INDONESIA","authors":"Joko Suliyono, T. Risfandy","doi":"10.21098/jimf.v7i3.1376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the market discipline of Islamic banks, as manifested by the responses of depositors with regard to their deposits and profit-sharing ratio to the fundamentals of the banks in the case of Indonesia. We analyse the supply and demand function of deposits using panel data from 10 Islamic banks from 2010 Q1 to 2019 Q4. We empirically find that market discipline in Indonesian Islamic banks is relatively weak, and conjecture that this is for two reasons. First, religious depositors have driven the unusual behaviour of Islamic banks, as we find that they stay with the same bank, even if it has poor fundamental conditions. Second, the profit and loss sharing mechanism means that Islamic bank depositors do not have great flexibility in demanding a higher rate relevant to the risk they must bear. This is because depositors' actual return is set to be consistent with the actual profit obtained from the banks' lending activities. Our results lead to the call for policymakers to effectively monitor the fundamental conditions of Islamic banks and to collaborate with agencies and organisations that promote Islamic bank development in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":31622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i3.1376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examines the market discipline of Islamic banks, as manifested by the responses of depositors with regard to their deposits and profit-sharing ratio to the fundamentals of the banks in the case of Indonesia. We analyse the supply and demand function of deposits using panel data from 10 Islamic banks from 2010 Q1 to 2019 Q4. We empirically find that market discipline in Indonesian Islamic banks is relatively weak, and conjecture that this is for two reasons. First, religious depositors have driven the unusual behaviour of Islamic banks, as we find that they stay with the same bank, even if it has poor fundamental conditions. Second, the profit and loss sharing mechanism means that Islamic bank depositors do not have great flexibility in demanding a higher rate relevant to the risk they must bear. This is because depositors' actual return is set to be consistent with the actual profit obtained from the banks' lending activities. Our results lead to the call for policymakers to effectively monitor the fundamental conditions of Islamic banks and to collaborate with agencies and organisations that promote Islamic bank development in Indonesia.
印尼伊斯兰银行市场纪律
本文考察了伊斯兰银行的市场纪律,正如在印度尼西亚的情况下,存款人对其存款和利润分享比例对银行基本面的反应所表现的那样。我们使用2010年第一季度至2019年第四季度10家伊斯兰银行的面板数据分析了存款的供求函数。我们的经验发现,印尼伊斯兰银行的市场纪律相对较弱,并推测这有两个原因。首先,宗教存款人推动了伊斯兰银行的不寻常行为,因为我们发现,即使银行的基本条件很差,他们也会留在同一家银行。其次,盈亏分担机制意味着,伊斯兰银行的储户在要求与其必须承担的风险相关的更高利率方面没有很大的灵活性。这是因为存款人的实际回报被设定为与银行从贷款活动中获得的实际利润一致。我们的研究结果呼吁政策制定者有效地监测伊斯兰银行的基本状况,并与促进印度尼西亚伊斯兰银行发展的机构和组织合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信