Exchange nailing, for atrophic non-union of the tibia, after implant breakage, post a non-traumatic event

Rohit M Sane, K. Parelkar, Sunil H. Shetty
{"title":"Exchange nailing, for atrophic non-union of the tibia, after implant breakage, post a non-traumatic event","authors":"Rohit M Sane, K. Parelkar, Sunil H. Shetty","doi":"10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The most feared complication of fracture management is non-union. Non-union can be of the following types, hypertrophic, oligotrophic, atrophic, and septic. In view of a non-union, exchange nailing is preferred and so routinely performed for non-unions and fractures of the tibia. Case Presentation: Here, we present a case of an implant failure from an atraumatic event in a case of atrophic non-union of the tibia, which was treated by exchange nailing and bone grafting. A 22-year-old male, with a history of the left closed tibia fibula diaphysis fracture 1 year ago, underwent exchange nailing with bone grating after having an atrophic non-union with implant breakage. Conclusion: Implant failure and non-union are caused due to a wide variety of factors. Appropriate implant selection for fracture type, reaming, fracture site compression, good reduction, and adequate and early mobilization are important factors for a satisfactory union and prevention of secondary surgeries.","PeriodicalId":15476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jcorth.2022.v07i02.541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most feared complication of fracture management is non-union. Non-union can be of the following types, hypertrophic, oligotrophic, atrophic, and septic. In view of a non-union, exchange nailing is preferred and so routinely performed for non-unions and fractures of the tibia. Case Presentation: Here, we present a case of an implant failure from an atraumatic event in a case of atrophic non-union of the tibia, which was treated by exchange nailing and bone grafting. A 22-year-old male, with a history of the left closed tibia fibula diaphysis fracture 1 year ago, underwent exchange nailing with bone grating after having an atrophic non-union with implant breakage. Conclusion: Implant failure and non-union are caused due to a wide variety of factors. Appropriate implant selection for fracture type, reaming, fracture site compression, good reduction, and adequate and early mobilization are important factors for a satisfactory union and prevention of secondary surgeries.
交换钉,用于治疗萎缩性胫骨不愈合,假体断裂后,非创伤性事件
背景:骨折治疗中最可怕的并发症是骨不连。骨不连可分为以下类型:肥厚性、少营养性、萎缩性和脓毒性。考虑到骨不连,交换内钉是首选,因此通常用于胫骨骨不连和骨折。病例介绍:在这里,我们提出了一例因萎缩性胫骨不愈合而导致的非创伤性植入失败的病例,该病例通过交换钉和植骨治疗。22岁男性,1年前有左侧闭合性胫骨腓骨骨干骨折病史,因萎缩性骨不连伴内种植体断裂接受骨栅交换钉。结论:种植体失败和不愈合是由多种因素引起的。根据骨折类型选择合适的种植体,扩孔,骨折部位压缩,复位良好,充分和早期活动是实现满意愈合和预防二次手术的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信