From pandemic to endemic: A comparison of first, second, and third waves of COVID-19 for applicability in communicable disease management

K. Kennedy, Gregory N Orewa, A. G. Hall, Sue S. Feldman, F. Zengul, T. Peters, Kristine R. Hearld
{"title":"From pandemic to endemic: A comparison of first, second, and third waves of COVID-19 for applicability in communicable disease management","authors":"K. Kennedy, Gregory N Orewa, A. G. Hall, Sue S. Feldman, F. Zengul, T. Peters, Kristine R. Hearld","doi":"10.5430/jha.v11n2p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created pressure on healthcare systems worldwide. Hospitals have developed strategies to efficiently address the demand for inpatient beds.Objective: This paper examines changes in length of stay at a southern academic medical center and documents the intervention efforts aimed at providing high quality care and reduced lengths of stay.Methods: Data include 3,279 patients receiving inpatient treatment for COVID-19 between March 29, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The study data mirrors the three major waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Alabama as reported in Johns Hopkins’ coronavirus resource center. To account for the chronological change in care processes, we interviewed Hospitalists and categorized the interventions by month, June 2020-February 2021. We examined changes in average length of stay and differences in sociodemographic characteristics among the three waves using ANOVA and chi-square tests. Socio demographic factors analyzed include age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance.Results: The average length of stay, ICU admissions, and 30-day readmissions each decreased in the second and third waves compared to the first wave. Statistically significant differences were found for ICU admission, age, and insurance for hospitalized patients among waves.Conclusions: This study contributes to the COVID-19 literature by providing the chronological evolution of ALOS and interventions during the pandemic by highlighting the case of a southern academic medical center.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v11n2p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic created pressure on healthcare systems worldwide. Hospitals have developed strategies to efficiently address the demand for inpatient beds.Objective: This paper examines changes in length of stay at a southern academic medical center and documents the intervention efforts aimed at providing high quality care and reduced lengths of stay.Methods: Data include 3,279 patients receiving inpatient treatment for COVID-19 between March 29, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The study data mirrors the three major waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Alabama as reported in Johns Hopkins’ coronavirus resource center. To account for the chronological change in care processes, we interviewed Hospitalists and categorized the interventions by month, June 2020-February 2021. We examined changes in average length of stay and differences in sociodemographic characteristics among the three waves using ANOVA and chi-square tests. Socio demographic factors analyzed include age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance.Results: The average length of stay, ICU admissions, and 30-day readmissions each decreased in the second and third waves compared to the first wave. Statistically significant differences were found for ICU admission, age, and insurance for hospitalized patients among waves.Conclusions: This study contributes to the COVID-19 literature by providing the chronological evolution of ALOS and interventions during the pandemic by highlighting the case of a southern academic medical center.
从大流行到地方性流行:第一波、第二波和第三波COVID-19在传染病管理中的适用性比较
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球卫生保健系统带来了压力。医院制定了有效解决住院床位需求的战略。目的:本文考察了在南方学术医疗中心停留时间的变化,并记录了旨在提供高质量护理和缩短停留时间的干预措施。方法:数据包括2020年3月29日至2021年10月31日期间接受COVID-19住院治疗的3279例患者。该研究数据反映了约翰霍普金斯大学冠状病毒资源中心报告的阿拉巴马州COVID-19大流行的三波主要浪潮。为了解释护理过程的时间顺序变化,我们采访了医院医生,并按月(2020年6月至2021年2月)对干预措施进行了分类。我们使用方差分析和卡方检验检验了三次浪潮中平均停留时间的变化和社会人口学特征的差异。分析的社会人口因素包括年龄、性别、种族/民族、婚姻状况和保险。结果:与第一波相比,第二波和第三波患者的平均住院时间、ICU入院次数和30天再入院次数均有所下降。各波间住院患者的ICU入院、年龄、保险情况差异有统计学意义。结论:本研究通过突出南方学术医疗中心的案例,提供了疫情期间ALOS和干预措施的时间演变,为COVID-19文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信