Pedestrian crossing decision during flashing green-countdown signal for urban signalized intersection

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Xueqin Long, Meng Zhou, Huan Zhao, Ya’nan Song
{"title":"Pedestrian crossing decision during flashing green-countdown signal for urban signalized intersection","authors":"Xueqin Long, Meng Zhou, Huan Zhao, Ya’nan Song","doi":"10.1080/19439962.2021.1949415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the signal-transition period for the signalized intersection, pedestrians will face a dilemma of whether to cross or wait. The study establishes a decision model of pedestrian-crossing based on risk-cost and time-utility during flashing green-countdown signal. First, the calculation methods of potential and direct risk in each direction of the intersection are proposed according to the traffic operation status. Then, analyze the relationship among the arrival time, remaining duration of flashing green signal and the actual crossing behavior, pedestrians are divided into adventurous, ordinary and conservative types respectively. Finally, introducing the time utility function, crossing decision models of three types pedestrians are established respectively based on comparing the risk cost and time utility. Take two signalized intersections as examples, parameters of decision models are calibrated through field investigation. Three types of models’ accuracy rates for the adventurous, ordinary and conservative pedestrians are 80%, 90% and 60% respectively, which denotes that the models can accurately predict the decision behavior of adventurous and ordinary pedestrians. Additionally, pedestrians are less sensitive to risk and more sensitive to time when they are faced with urgent time.","PeriodicalId":46672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1949415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract During the signal-transition period for the signalized intersection, pedestrians will face a dilemma of whether to cross or wait. The study establishes a decision model of pedestrian-crossing based on risk-cost and time-utility during flashing green-countdown signal. First, the calculation methods of potential and direct risk in each direction of the intersection are proposed according to the traffic operation status. Then, analyze the relationship among the arrival time, remaining duration of flashing green signal and the actual crossing behavior, pedestrians are divided into adventurous, ordinary and conservative types respectively. Finally, introducing the time utility function, crossing decision models of three types pedestrians are established respectively based on comparing the risk cost and time utility. Take two signalized intersections as examples, parameters of decision models are calibrated through field investigation. Three types of models’ accuracy rates for the adventurous, ordinary and conservative pedestrians are 80%, 90% and 60% respectively, which denotes that the models can accurately predict the decision behavior of adventurous and ordinary pedestrians. Additionally, pedestrians are less sensitive to risk and more sensitive to time when they are faced with urgent time.
摘要在信号交叉口的信号转换阶段,行人面临着“是过马路还是等待”的两难选择。建立了绿灯倒计时信号闪烁时行人过街的风险成本和时间效用决策模型。首先,根据交叉口的交通运行状况,提出交叉口各方向潜在风险和直接风险的计算方法;然后,分析行人到达时间、绿灯闪烁剩余时间与实际过马路行为的关系,将行人分为冒险型、普通型和保守型。最后,引入时间效用函数,在比较风险成本和时间效用的基础上,分别建立了三类行人的过马路决策模型。以两个信号交叉口为例,通过实地调研对决策模型参数进行了标定。三种模型对冒险型、普通型和保守型行人的准确率分别为80%、90%和60%,表明模型能够准确预测冒险型和普通型行人的决策行为。此外,行人在面对紧急时间时,对风险的敏感度较低,对时间的敏感度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信