2022-RA-941-ESGO CEBOC, a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the safety of cediranib in the prevention of bowel perforation in platinum resistant ovarian cancer
A. Murphy, Catharine Porter, A. White, Alys Irving, R. Ray, A. Casbard, Tracie-Ann Madden, Reem D. Mahmood, R. Morgan, J. Pugh, Chelsey Wheeler, Victoria Roberts, Giorgio Arnetoli, Z. Salih, J. Hasan, C. Mitchell, A. Clamp, G. Jayson
{"title":"2022-RA-941-ESGO CEBOC, a single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the safety of cediranib in the prevention of bowel perforation in platinum resistant ovarian cancer","authors":"A. Murphy, Catharine Porter, A. White, Alys Irving, R. Ray, A. Casbard, Tracie-Ann Madden, Reem D. Mahmood, R. Morgan, J. Pugh, Chelsey Wheeler, Victoria Roberts, Giorgio Arnetoli, Z. Salih, J. Hasan, C. Mitchell, A. Clamp, G. Jayson","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2022-esgo.599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2022-RA-939-ESGO Figure 1 Relative mRNA expression of HO-1, IL-1b, IL-4, IL-6, PD-1, PD-L1 genes in PBMCs from ovarian cancer patients on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day after surgery compared to the expression before the treatment. Bar graphs show median value and interquartile range *p<0.05 Results Median age of controls and cancer patients were 59 (26) and 58 (14) years respectively (p>0.05). The mRNA expression of all markers in PBMCs were significantly downregulated in cancer patients before surgery comparing to controls (p<0.05). Relative median expression of HO-1, IL1b, IL-4, IL-6, PD-1 and PD-L1 in controls and cancer patients respectively were 0.97 (0.33) vs 0.66 (0.5), 0.87 (1.95) vs 0.07 (0.16), 0.86 (1.39) vs 0.43 (0.61), 0.98 (1.15) vs 0.03 (0.03), 0.99 (0.94) vs 0.32 (0.50), 1.18 (0.66) vs 0.26 (0.36). Significant post-surgical changes in IL-6 and PD-L1 expression were observed along with not significant fluctuations of other targets expression (figure 1). Conclusion Investigated components of anticancer immunity and immunosuppression mechanisms are affected by cancer and surgical treatment. Therefore, PBMCs are worthy targets for detailed investigation in this field. 2022-RA-941-ESGO CEBOC, A SINGLE-ARM PHASE II TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF CEDIRANIB IN THE PREVENTION OF BOWEL PERFORATION IN PLATINUM RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER Alexander Murphy, Catharine Porter, Ann White, Alys Irving, Ruby Ray, Angela Casbard, Tracie-Ann Madden, Reem Mahmood, Robert Morgan, Julia Pugh, Chelsey Wheeler, Victoria Roberts, Giorgio Arnetoli, Zena Salih, Jurjees Hasan, Claire Mitchell, Andrew Clamp, Gordon Jayson. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.599 Introduction/Background Systemic treatment of platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancers (PROC) utilises cytotoxic chemotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. However, patients at risk for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) are excluded from this efficacious combination due to risk of bowel perforation. Methodology We conducted a Simon’s two-stage trial combining oral VEGFR inhibitor cediranib (20 mg/day) with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m), in participants with recurrent PROC and clinical and/or radiological features indicating an increased risk of developing MBO. Primary endpoint was number of patients free of grade 3–5 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) or fistula, from those who received 5 days and £18 weeks cediranib, causally related to cediranib. With 90% power and 5% significance, 24 evaluable patients were required, with 22 free of GIP or fistula to demonstrate safety. Cediranib could start with chemotherapy, or at cycle 2 or 3, once bowel symptoms were CTCAE grade £2. Previous bevacizumab exposure and prior MBO were permitted. Patients were continued on cediranib maintenance after paclitaxel completion, and optionally proceeded to cediranib plus olaparib (300 mg bd) at disease progression. Results 30 participants were enrolled from March 2018 to February 2021. 90% ECOG 0–1, 97% had symptoms showing risk of bowel obstruction. 1 patient died before any treatment. 12 received paclitaxel only (bowel symptoms didn’t improve or deterioration) and subsequently progressed. 17 patients were evaluable for primary endpoint; none developed GIP or fistula. Three cediranib+paclitaxel participants developed bowel obstruction (any grade; including one receiving cediranib+olaparib). Three participants had grade 3+ SAEs causally related to cediranib+/-olaparib (one diarrhoea; one diarrhoea and TIA; one vomiting). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95%CI: 4.18–8.25), and overall survival 15.2 months (95%CI: 8.52–20.5). Abstracts Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 A281 on D ecem er 2, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .99 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom Abstract 2022-RA-941-ESGO Figure 12022-RA-941-ESGO Figure 1 Conclusion There is no evidence that combining cediranib and taxane chemotherapy is associated with serious toxicity or of developing GIP/fistula, although this is underpowered due to participant withdrawal. 2022-RA-944-ESGO REAL-WORLD SAFETY, BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND FIRST-YEAR THERAPY MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH BRCA1/BRCA2-MUTATED ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER TREATED WITH OLAPARIB TABLETS IN THE FIRST-LINE MAINTENANCE SETTING: FIRST ANALYSIS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN OVAL-1 STUDY Domenica Lorusso, Charlie Gourley, Delphine Garbay, Bernard Jean Roger Asselain, Francesco Raspagliesi, Claudio Zamagni, Alexandra Leary, Charlotte Bellier, Ros Glasspool, Gordon Jayson, Angela Whittle, Ilaria Sabatucci, Emmanuelle Grevat, Muriel Licour, Rowan Miller. Dipartimento scienze della salute della donna, del bambino e di sanita’ pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Clinique Tivoli Ducos, Bordeaux, France; ARCAGY-GINECO, Paris, France; Department Of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France; Départements De Cancérologie Gynécologique Et Sénologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Medical Affairs Department, AstraZeneca, London, UK; AstraZeneca, Milan, Italy; AstraZeneca, Paris, France; University College London Hospital, London, UK; St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.600 Introduction/Background In this preliminary evaluation of the first 324 patients enrolled in the OVAL-1 study (NCT04532645), we report real-world characteristics and firstyear therapy management among tumour or germline (t/g) BRCA1/BRCA2-mutated (t/gBRCAm) newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC) patients who received maintenance olaparib across Italy, UK and France. Abstract 2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 1 Baseline characteristics2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 1 Baseline characteristics Abstract 2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 2 AEs2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 2 AEs Methodology This observational, retrospective study included patients who received maintenance olaparib (300 mg bid) for t/gBRCAm advanced OC following response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients received their first dose between January 2019 and June 2020 (index date). The planned enrolment is 350 patients. Data are collected from routine clinical practice. Adverse events (AEs) were defined as Abstracts A282 Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 on D ecem er 2, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .99 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom","PeriodicalId":89343,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-esgo.599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
2022-RA-939-ESGO Figure 1 Relative mRNA expression of HO-1, IL-1b, IL-4, IL-6, PD-1, PD-L1 genes in PBMCs from ovarian cancer patients on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day after surgery compared to the expression before the treatment. Bar graphs show median value and interquartile range *p<0.05 Results Median age of controls and cancer patients were 59 (26) and 58 (14) years respectively (p>0.05). The mRNA expression of all markers in PBMCs were significantly downregulated in cancer patients before surgery comparing to controls (p<0.05). Relative median expression of HO-1, IL1b, IL-4, IL-6, PD-1 and PD-L1 in controls and cancer patients respectively were 0.97 (0.33) vs 0.66 (0.5), 0.87 (1.95) vs 0.07 (0.16), 0.86 (1.39) vs 0.43 (0.61), 0.98 (1.15) vs 0.03 (0.03), 0.99 (0.94) vs 0.32 (0.50), 1.18 (0.66) vs 0.26 (0.36). Significant post-surgical changes in IL-6 and PD-L1 expression were observed along with not significant fluctuations of other targets expression (figure 1). Conclusion Investigated components of anticancer immunity and immunosuppression mechanisms are affected by cancer and surgical treatment. Therefore, PBMCs are worthy targets for detailed investigation in this field. 2022-RA-941-ESGO CEBOC, A SINGLE-ARM PHASE II TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF CEDIRANIB IN THE PREVENTION OF BOWEL PERFORATION IN PLATINUM RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER Alexander Murphy, Catharine Porter, Ann White, Alys Irving, Ruby Ray, Angela Casbard, Tracie-Ann Madden, Reem Mahmood, Robert Morgan, Julia Pugh, Chelsey Wheeler, Victoria Roberts, Giorgio Arnetoli, Zena Salih, Jurjees Hasan, Claire Mitchell, Andrew Clamp, Gordon Jayson. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.599 Introduction/Background Systemic treatment of platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancers (PROC) utilises cytotoxic chemotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors. However, patients at risk for malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) are excluded from this efficacious combination due to risk of bowel perforation. Methodology We conducted a Simon’s two-stage trial combining oral VEGFR inhibitor cediranib (20 mg/day) with weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m), in participants with recurrent PROC and clinical and/or radiological features indicating an increased risk of developing MBO. Primary endpoint was number of patients free of grade 3–5 gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) or fistula, from those who received 5 days and £18 weeks cediranib, causally related to cediranib. With 90% power and 5% significance, 24 evaluable patients were required, with 22 free of GIP or fistula to demonstrate safety. Cediranib could start with chemotherapy, or at cycle 2 or 3, once bowel symptoms were CTCAE grade £2. Previous bevacizumab exposure and prior MBO were permitted. Patients were continued on cediranib maintenance after paclitaxel completion, and optionally proceeded to cediranib plus olaparib (300 mg bd) at disease progression. Results 30 participants were enrolled from March 2018 to February 2021. 90% ECOG 0–1, 97% had symptoms showing risk of bowel obstruction. 1 patient died before any treatment. 12 received paclitaxel only (bowel symptoms didn’t improve or deterioration) and subsequently progressed. 17 patients were evaluable for primary endpoint; none developed GIP or fistula. Three cediranib+paclitaxel participants developed bowel obstruction (any grade; including one receiving cediranib+olaparib). Three participants had grade 3+ SAEs causally related to cediranib+/-olaparib (one diarrhoea; one diarrhoea and TIA; one vomiting). Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95%CI: 4.18–8.25), and overall survival 15.2 months (95%CI: 8.52–20.5). Abstracts Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 A281 on D ecem er 2, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .99 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom Abstract 2022-RA-941-ESGO Figure 12022-RA-941-ESGO Figure 1 Conclusion There is no evidence that combining cediranib and taxane chemotherapy is associated with serious toxicity or of developing GIP/fistula, although this is underpowered due to participant withdrawal. 2022-RA-944-ESGO REAL-WORLD SAFETY, BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND FIRST-YEAR THERAPY MANAGEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH BRCA1/BRCA2-MUTATED ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER TREATED WITH OLAPARIB TABLETS IN THE FIRST-LINE MAINTENANCE SETTING: FIRST ANALYSIS OF THE PAN-EUROPEAN OVAL-1 STUDY Domenica Lorusso, Charlie Gourley, Delphine Garbay, Bernard Jean Roger Asselain, Francesco Raspagliesi, Claudio Zamagni, Alexandra Leary, Charlotte Bellier, Ros Glasspool, Gordon Jayson, Angela Whittle, Ilaria Sabatucci, Emmanuelle Grevat, Muriel Licour, Rowan Miller. Dipartimento scienze della salute della donna, del bambino e di sanita’ pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Clinique Tivoli Ducos, Bordeaux, France; ARCAGY-GINECO, Paris, France; Department Of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France; Départements De Cancérologie Gynécologique Et Sénologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Medical Affairs Department, AstraZeneca, London, UK; AstraZeneca, Milan, Italy; AstraZeneca, Paris, France; University College London Hospital, London, UK; St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK 10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.600 Introduction/Background In this preliminary evaluation of the first 324 patients enrolled in the OVAL-1 study (NCT04532645), we report real-world characteristics and firstyear therapy management among tumour or germline (t/g) BRCA1/BRCA2-mutated (t/gBRCAm) newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC) patients who received maintenance olaparib across Italy, UK and France. Abstract 2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 1 Baseline characteristics2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 1 Baseline characteristics Abstract 2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 2 AEs2022-RA-944-ESGO Table 2 AEs Methodology This observational, retrospective study included patients who received maintenance olaparib (300 mg bid) for t/gBRCAm advanced OC following response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients received their first dose between January 2019 and June 2020 (index date). The planned enrolment is 350 patients. Data are collected from routine clinical practice. Adverse events (AEs) were defined as Abstracts A282 Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022;32(Suppl 2):A1–A504 on D ecem er 2, 2022 by gest. P rocted by coright. http/ijgc.bm jcom / nt J G ynecol C acer: frst pulished as 10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .99 on 20 O cber 222. D ow nladed fom
图1卵巢癌患者术后第1、3、5天外周血细胞中HO-1、IL-1b、IL-4、IL-6、PD-1、PD-L1基因mRNA相对表达量与治疗前比较。柱状图显示中位数和四分位差(p0.05)。与对照组相比,术前肿瘤患者外周血mcs各标志物mRNA表达均显著下调(p<0.05)。HO-1、il - 1b、IL-4、IL-6、PD-1和PD-L1在对照组和肿瘤患者中的相对中位表达分别为0.97 (0.33)vs 0.66(0.5)、0.87 (1.95)vs 0.07(0.16)、0.86 (1.39)vs 0.43(0.61)、0.98 (1.15)vs 0.03(0.03)、0.99 (0.94)vs 0.32(0.50)、1.18 (0.66)vs 0.26(0.36)。术后观察到IL-6和PD-L1表达有明显变化,而其他靶点表达无明显波动(图1)。结论肿瘤和手术治疗对抗癌免疫成分和免疫抑制机制有影响。因此,pbmc是该领域值得深入研究的对象。Alexander Murphy, Catharine Porter, Ann White, Alys Irving, Ruby Ray, Angela Casbard, Tracie-Ann Madden, Reem Mahmood, Robert Morgan, Julia Pugh, chelsea Wheeler, Victoria Roberts, Giorgio Arnetoli, Zena Salih, Jurjees Hasan, Claire Mitchell, Andrew Clamp, Gordon Jayson。英国曼彻斯特克里斯蒂NHS基金会信托基金;卡迪夫大学试验研究中心,英国卡迪夫10.1136/ijgc-2022-ESGO.599介绍/背景铂耐药晚期卵巢癌(PROC)的全身治疗利用细胞毒性化疗和血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGFR)抑制剂。然而,由于肠穿孔的风险,有恶性肠梗阻(MBO)风险的患者被排除在这种有效的组合之外。我们进行了一项Simon的两阶段试验,将口服VEGFR抑制剂cediranib (20mg /天)与每周紫杉醇(70mg /m)联合使用,参与者复发性PROC和临床和/或放射学特征表明发生MBO的风险增加。主要终点是接受5天和18周cediranib治疗的患者中无3-5级胃肠道穿孔(GIP)或瘘的患者数量,这些患者与cediranib有因果关系。在90%的有效性和5%的显著性下,需要24例可评估的患者,其中22例没有GIP或瘘管以证明安全性。一旦肠道症状达到CTCAE 2级,Cediranib可以开始化疗,或者在第2或第3周期。允许既往贝伐单抗暴露和既往MBO。在紫杉醇治疗结束后,患者继续使用西地拉尼维持治疗,并在疾病进展时选择性地使用西地拉尼加奥拉帕尼(300mg / d)。结果2018年3月至2021年2月,30名参与者入组。90% ECOG 0-1, 97%有肠梗阻的危险症状。1例患者在治疗前死亡。12例仅接受紫杉醇治疗(肠道症状未改善或恶化),随后病情恶化。17例患者可评估主要终点;无GIP或瘘管。3名西地尼+紫杉醇参与者出现肠梗阻(任何级别;包括一例接受西地拉尼+奥拉帕尼治疗)。3名受试者发生与西地拉尼+/-奥拉帕尼有因果关系的3+级SAEs(1例腹泻;1例腹泻和TIA;一个呕吐)。中位无进展生存期为5.4个月(95%CI: 4.18-8.25),总生存期为15.2个月(95%CI: 8.52-20.5)。[J] journal of Gynecol Cancer, 2022;32(增刊2):A1-A504 A281 on D, 2022年1月2日。P由赖特保护。http / ijgc。jj.com / nt jgynecol C acer:首次发表于2002年12月20日,号10.11ijgc-2022-E S G O .99。图12022-RA-941-ESGO图1结论没有证据表明cediranib和紫杉烷联合化疗与严重毒性或发生GIP/瘘相关,尽管由于参与者退出,这一证据不足。奥拉帕尼片一线维持治疗brca1 / brca2突变晚期卵巢癌患者的真实世界安全性、基线特征和第一年治疗管理:Domenica Lorusso, Charlie Gourley, Delphine Garbay, Bernard Jean Roger Asselain, Francesco Raspagliesi, Claudio Zamagni, Alexandra Leary, Charlotte Bellier, Ros Glasspool, Gordon Jayson, Angela Whittle, Ilaria Sabatucci, Emmanuelle Grevat, Muriel Licour, Rowan Miller。