Ground-Truthing Forest Change Detection Algorithms in Working Forests of the US Northeast

Madeleine L. Desrochers, Wayne Tripp, Stephen R. Logan, E. Bevilacqua, L. Johnson, C. Beier
{"title":"Ground-Truthing Forest Change Detection Algorithms in Working Forests of the US Northeast","authors":"Madeleine L. Desrochers, Wayne Tripp, Stephen R. Logan, E. Bevilacqua, L. Johnson, C. Beier","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvab075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The need for reliable landscape-scale monitoring of forest disturbance has grown with increased policy and regulatory attention to promoting the climate benefits of forests. Change detection algorithms based on satellite imagery can address this need but are largely untested for the forest types and disturbance regimes of the US Northeast, including management practices common in northern hardwoods and mixed hardwood-conifer forests. This study ground-truthed the “off-the-shelf” outputs of three satellite-based change detection algorithms using detailed harvest records and maps covering 43,000 ha of working forests in northeastern New York.\n Study Implications: Algorithms performed best in detecting clearcuts, but performed much worse and poorly overall in detecting the partial harvest prescriptions (e.g., shelterwoods, thinnings) that were far more common in our ground-truthing data (and for this region). Among the algorithms tested, Landtrendr was consistently superior at both detecting partial harvests and estimating harvest intensity (volume removals), but there still remained substantial room for improvement. Overall, we suggest that these algorithms need further training and tuning to be reliably used for accurate monitoring of harvest-related activities in working forests of the US Northeast.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvab075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The need for reliable landscape-scale monitoring of forest disturbance has grown with increased policy and regulatory attention to promoting the climate benefits of forests. Change detection algorithms based on satellite imagery can address this need but are largely untested for the forest types and disturbance regimes of the US Northeast, including management practices common in northern hardwoods and mixed hardwood-conifer forests. This study ground-truthed the “off-the-shelf” outputs of three satellite-based change detection algorithms using detailed harvest records and maps covering 43,000 ha of working forests in northeastern New York. Study Implications: Algorithms performed best in detecting clearcuts, but performed much worse and poorly overall in detecting the partial harvest prescriptions (e.g., shelterwoods, thinnings) that were far more common in our ground-truthing data (and for this region). Among the algorithms tested, Landtrendr was consistently superior at both detecting partial harvests and estimating harvest intensity (volume removals), but there still remained substantial room for improvement. Overall, we suggest that these algorithms need further training and tuning to be reliably used for accurate monitoring of harvest-related activities in working forests of the US Northeast.
美国东北部工作森林的地面真实森林变化检测算法
随着政策和规章对促进森林的气候效益的重视增加,对森林干扰进行可靠的景观尺度监测的必要性也增加了。基于卫星图像的变化检测算法可以满足这一需求,但在美国东北部的森林类型和干扰制度方面,包括在北方阔叶林和阔叶林-针叶林混交林中常见的管理实践,在很大程度上尚未经过测试。这项研究利用详细的采伐记录和覆盖纽约东北部43,000公顷森林的地图,对三种基于卫星的变化检测算法的“现成”输出进行了实地验证。研究启示:算法在检测砍伐方面表现最好,但在检测部分采伐处方(例如,防护林,疏林)方面表现得更差,总体上表现不佳,而这些处方在我们的地面真实数据(以及该地区)中更为常见。在测试的算法中,Landtrendr在检测部分收获和估计收获强度(体积移除)方面始终优于其他算法,但仍有很大的改进空间。总的来说,我们建议这些算法需要进一步的训练和调整,以可靠地用于准确监测美国东北部工作森林的收获相关活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信