Benefit–Cost Analysis of Increased Funding for Agricultural Research and Development in the Global South

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
M. Rosegrant, Brad Wong, T. Sulser, Nancy Dubosse, Travis J. Lybbert
{"title":"Benefit–Cost Analysis of Increased Funding for Agricultural Research and Development in the Global South","authors":"M. Rosegrant, Brad Wong, T. Sulser, Nancy Dubosse, Travis J. Lybbert","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper conducts a benefit–cost analysis of expanding agricultural research and development (R&D) in the Global South. We extend a recent modeling exercise that used IFPRI’s IMPACT model to estimate the investments required to reduce the global prevalence of hunger below 5%. After 35 years, the increased funding is estimated to increase agricultural output by 10%, reduce the prevalence of hunger by 35%, reduce food prices by 16%, and increase per capita incomes by 4% relative to a counterfactual where funding continues to rise on historical trends. Using an 8% discount rate, the net present value of the costs of agricultural R&D are estimated at $61 billion for the next 35 years, while the net present benefits in terms of net economic surplus (the sum of consumer and producer surplus) are estimated at $2.1 trillion. The central estimate of the benefit–cost ratio (BCR) is 33, consistent with previous research documenting high average returns to agricultural research and development. The central BCR reported in this study places the intervention at the 91st percentile of all previous Copenhagen Consensus BCRs in agriculture, and 87th percentile for all BCRs regardless of sector. Agricultural R&D is likely one of the best uses of resources for the remainder of the Sustainable Development Goals and decades beyond.","PeriodicalId":45587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2023.27","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper conducts a benefit–cost analysis of expanding agricultural research and development (R&D) in the Global South. We extend a recent modeling exercise that used IFPRI’s IMPACT model to estimate the investments required to reduce the global prevalence of hunger below 5%. After 35 years, the increased funding is estimated to increase agricultural output by 10%, reduce the prevalence of hunger by 35%, reduce food prices by 16%, and increase per capita incomes by 4% relative to a counterfactual where funding continues to rise on historical trends. Using an 8% discount rate, the net present value of the costs of agricultural R&D are estimated at $61 billion for the next 35 years, while the net present benefits in terms of net economic surplus (the sum of consumer and producer surplus) are estimated at $2.1 trillion. The central estimate of the benefit–cost ratio (BCR) is 33, consistent with previous research documenting high average returns to agricultural research and development. The central BCR reported in this study places the intervention at the 91st percentile of all previous Copenhagen Consensus BCRs in agriculture, and 87th percentile for all BCRs regardless of sector. Agricultural R&D is likely one of the best uses of resources for the remainder of the Sustainable Development Goals and decades beyond.
增加发展中国家农业研究与发展资金的收益-成本分析
本文对发展中国家扩大农业研究与开发(R&D)进行了效益-成本分析。我们扩展了最近的一项建模工作,该工作使用国际粮食政策研究所的IMPACT模型来估计将全球饥饿发生率降低到5%以下所需的投资。35年后,增加的资金估计将使农业产出增加10%,饥饿发生率降低35%,粮食价格降低16%,人均收入增加4%,而资金继续按历史趋势增长的情况则相反。使用8%的贴现率,未来35年农业研发成本的净现值估计为610亿美元,而净经济盈余(消费者和生产者剩余的总和)的净现值收益估计为2.1万亿美元。效益成本比(BCR)的中心估计值为33,与先前记录农业研发高平均回报的研究一致。本研究报告的核心BCR将干预置于所有先前哥本哈根共识农业BCR的第91个百分位,以及所有BCR的第87个百分位,无论部门。农业研发可能是可持续发展目标剩余时间和未来几十年的最佳资源利用方式之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信