Examining the Relationship between Salivary Amylase Level, Head Trauma Severity and CT Scan Results in Patients with Isolated Mild Head Trauma

M. Ebrahimi, Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Baharak Davoudpour, Z. Abbasi Shaye, Hossein Zakeri, S. Mousavi, S. Sadrzadeh, S. A. Shamsian, Azadeh Mahmoudi Gharaee
{"title":"Examining the Relationship between Salivary Amylase Level, Head Trauma Severity and CT Scan Results in Patients with Isolated Mild Head Trauma","authors":"M. Ebrahimi, Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Baharak Davoudpour, Z. Abbasi Shaye, Hossein Zakeri, S. Mousavi, S. Sadrzadeh, S. A. Shamsian, Azadeh Mahmoudi Gharaee","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2022.94151.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the relationship between salivary amylase level and computed tomoraphy (CT scan) findings in patients with isolated mild traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) referred to the emergency department of Shahid Hasheminejad Hospital. Methods: Patients with isolated mTBI and indication for brain CT scan who referred to the trauma center of Shahid Hasheminejad Hospital, Mashhad, Iran in 2019 were included in a cross-sectional study. In the initial examination, the patient’s level of consciousness was measured using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and saliva samples were taken at the emergency department to determine the level of salivary amylase. A brain CT scan was performed for all patients. Age, gender, cause of trauma, the trauma severity and CT scan results were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed on the data. Results: One-hundred fifty patients were enrolled in this study (men=101, women=49). The trauma causes were included accidents (n=88; 58%), falls (n=37; 25%) and miscellaneous factors (e.g., quarrels; n=25; 17%). GCS was 15 in 142 patients and 14 in the rest. In all patients, the trauma severity was mild to high risk (Minor). CT scan results unfolded pathology in 10 cases (7%), while the residues (93%) had normal CT scans with no pathological evidence. Salivary amylase level in the patients’ saliva samples was between 137 to 8000 units per liter. Using the t-test to evaluate the relationship between salivary amylase levels and CT scan results uncovered a significant relationship. Spearman correlation revealed no significant relationship between the amylase and GCS levels. Conclusion: Data statistical analysis from 150 patients with isolated head trauma manifested that salivary amylase levels were significantly higher in the patients with pathological findings on CT scans. However, no significant relationship was found between salivary amylase level and age, gender, cause of trauma, and level of consciousness.","PeriodicalId":9328,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma","volume":"12 1","pages":"59 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Emergency & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.94151.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between salivary amylase level and computed tomoraphy (CT scan) findings in patients with isolated mild traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) referred to the emergency department of Shahid Hasheminejad Hospital. Methods: Patients with isolated mTBI and indication for brain CT scan who referred to the trauma center of Shahid Hasheminejad Hospital, Mashhad, Iran in 2019 were included in a cross-sectional study. In the initial examination, the patient’s level of consciousness was measured using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and saliva samples were taken at the emergency department to determine the level of salivary amylase. A brain CT scan was performed for all patients. Age, gender, cause of trauma, the trauma severity and CT scan results were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed on the data. Results: One-hundred fifty patients were enrolled in this study (men=101, women=49). The trauma causes were included accidents (n=88; 58%), falls (n=37; 25%) and miscellaneous factors (e.g., quarrels; n=25; 17%). GCS was 15 in 142 patients and 14 in the rest. In all patients, the trauma severity was mild to high risk (Minor). CT scan results unfolded pathology in 10 cases (7%), while the residues (93%) had normal CT scans with no pathological evidence. Salivary amylase level in the patients’ saliva samples was between 137 to 8000 units per liter. Using the t-test to evaluate the relationship between salivary amylase levels and CT scan results uncovered a significant relationship. Spearman correlation revealed no significant relationship between the amylase and GCS levels. Conclusion: Data statistical analysis from 150 patients with isolated head trauma manifested that salivary amylase levels were significantly higher in the patients with pathological findings on CT scans. However, no significant relationship was found between salivary amylase level and age, gender, cause of trauma, and level of consciousness.
孤立性轻度颅脑损伤患者唾液淀粉酶水平、颅脑损伤严重程度及CT扫描结果的关系研究
目的:探讨沙希德·哈什米内贾德医院急诊科孤立性轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者唾液淀粉酶水平与CT表现的关系。方法:选取2019年在伊朗马什哈德沙希德·哈什米内贾德医院创伤中心转诊的孤立性mTBI患者,并进行脑CT扫描指征的横断面研究。在初步检查中,使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)测量患者的意识水平,并在急诊科采集唾液样本以确定唾液淀粉酶水平。所有患者均行脑部CT扫描。记录年龄、性别、创伤原因、创伤严重程度及CT扫描结果。对数据进行统计分析。结果:150例患者入组研究(男性101例,女性49例)。创伤原因包括意外事故(n=88;58%),跌倒(n=37;25%)和其他因素(如争吵;n = 25;17%)。142例患者GCS为15,其余14例。所有患者的创伤严重程度均为轻度至高危(轻度)。10例(7%)CT扫描结果未显示病理,其余(93%)CT扫描正常,无病理证据。患者唾液样本中的唾液淀粉酶水平在每升137至8000单位之间。使用t检验来评估唾液淀粉酶水平与CT扫描结果之间的关系,发现了显著的关系。Spearman相关性显示淀粉酶与GCS水平无显著相关性。结论:对150例孤立性颅脑外伤患者的数据进行统计分析,发现有CT病理表现的患者唾液淀粉酶水平明显增高。然而,唾液淀粉酶水平与年龄、性别、创伤原因和意识水平之间没有显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信