{"title":"Narrating eros and agape","authors":"Zsolt Bojti","doi":"10.1515/fns-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fin-de-Siècle A Hungarian version of the present paper was published as “Erósz és Agapé: Erotextus Edward Prime-Stevenson Imre: Egy emlékirat című regényének expozíciójában” (2019) in Literatura affiliated with the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Supported by the ÚNKP-19-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology.” gay literature in English operated with a double narrative: one narrative offers a historical (and “innocent”) reading available to general readership; the other offers a personal (often illicit) reading available to the susceptible and initiated readers only. The double narrative, thus, allowed authors to give subtle visibility to same-sex desire in their works that would evade censorship. This paper argues that there is a similar double narrative in the exposition of Imre: A Memorandum by the American music critic and émigré writer Edward Prime-Stevenson. The double narrative of the novel, however, differs from that of prior gay literature. I argue that Prime-Stevenson thought it was a literary sin that prior gay literature offered a sensual, erotic, or even pornographic, subversive secondary reading to susceptible readers. In my reading, Prime-Stevenson consciously planted cues in the exposition of the novel, thus, created an erotext to trigger a similar subversive and illicit reading of his text. However, Prime-Stevenson used this technique to demonstrate that purely erotic literary representations denigrate same-sex desire; therefore, in what followed, he presented a different, agapeic view on same-sex desire. The paper substantiates that Prime-Stevenson’s intention was to break away from earlier narrative “traditions” of gay literature to offer a naturalised and legitimised representation and “script” of “homosexuality” per se. Prime-Stevenson did so in a crucial period of time, as the term “homosexual” just barely entered the English language and its pejorative connotations may not have been set in stone. The paper, as a result, casts a new complexion on sexuality as a literary phenomenon and the relevance of a complex narrative structure composed of “snares” and “false snares” in the exposition of Imre, which plays a crucial role in Prime-Stevenson authoring one of the very first openly homosexual novels in English, which has a happy ending.","PeriodicalId":29849,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2020-0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Fin-de-Siècle A Hungarian version of the present paper was published as “Erósz és Agapé: Erotextus Edward Prime-Stevenson Imre: Egy emlékirat című regényének expozíciójában” (2019) in Literatura affiliated with the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Supported by the ÚNKP-19-3 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology.” gay literature in English operated with a double narrative: one narrative offers a historical (and “innocent”) reading available to general readership; the other offers a personal (often illicit) reading available to the susceptible and initiated readers only. The double narrative, thus, allowed authors to give subtle visibility to same-sex desire in their works that would evade censorship. This paper argues that there is a similar double narrative in the exposition of Imre: A Memorandum by the American music critic and émigré writer Edward Prime-Stevenson. The double narrative of the novel, however, differs from that of prior gay literature. I argue that Prime-Stevenson thought it was a literary sin that prior gay literature offered a sensual, erotic, or even pornographic, subversive secondary reading to susceptible readers. In my reading, Prime-Stevenson consciously planted cues in the exposition of the novel, thus, created an erotext to trigger a similar subversive and illicit reading of his text. However, Prime-Stevenson used this technique to demonstrate that purely erotic literary representations denigrate same-sex desire; therefore, in what followed, he presented a different, agapeic view on same-sex desire. The paper substantiates that Prime-Stevenson’s intention was to break away from earlier narrative “traditions” of gay literature to offer a naturalised and legitimised representation and “script” of “homosexuality” per se. Prime-Stevenson did so in a crucial period of time, as the term “homosexual” just barely entered the English language and its pejorative connotations may not have been set in stone. The paper, as a result, casts a new complexion on sexuality as a literary phenomenon and the relevance of a complex narrative structure composed of “snares” and “false snares” in the exposition of Imre, which plays a crucial role in Prime-Stevenson authoring one of the very first openly homosexual novels in English, which has a happy ending.
本文的匈牙利语版本发表在匈牙利科学院的《文学》(Literatura)上,标题为“Erósz : Erotextus Edward Prime-Stevenson Imre: Egy eml reg - ”(2019年)。国家创新技术部ÚNKP-19-3新一代优秀人才计划资助项目。“英语中的同性恋文学以双重叙事运作:一种叙事为普通读者提供了一种历史的(“无辜的”)阅读;另一种提供个人(通常是非法的)阅读,仅供易受影响和入门的读者使用。因此,双重叙事允许作者在他们的作品中给予同性欲望微妙的可见性,以逃避审查。本文认为,在美国乐评人、移民作家爱德华·普里姆-史蒂文森的《Imre: a Memorandum》的论述中,也存在着类似的双重叙事。然而,小说的双重叙事不同于以往的同性恋文学。我认为,Prime-Stevenson认为,先前的同性恋文学为易受影响的读者提供了一种感性的、色情的、甚至色情的、颠覆性的二次阅读,这是一种文学罪过。在我的阅读中,普利姆-史蒂文森有意识地在小说的阐述中植入线索,从而创造了一种色情文本,从而引发了对他的文本的类似颠覆性和非法阅读。然而,Prime-Stevenson用这种方法证明纯粹的情色文学表现诋毁了同性欲望;因此,在接下来的文章中,他对同性欲望提出了一种不同的、客观的观点。论文证实,Prime-Stevenson的意图是打破早期同性恋文学的叙事“传统”,为“同性恋”本身提供一种自然的、合法的表现和“剧本”。Prime-Stevenson是在一个关键时期这样做的,因为“同性恋”一词刚刚进入英语语言,其贬义的含义可能还没有固定下来。因此,本文对性作为一种文学现象,以及对伊姆雷的阐述中由“陷阱”和“假陷阱”组成的复杂叙事结构的相关性进行了新的审视。伊姆雷在普里姆-史蒂文森创作英国最早公开的同性恋小说之一的过程中起了至关重要的作用,并有了一个圆满的结局。