Should Investors Consider the Sentiment of Online Discussions? An Analysis of the Link between Fundamental Information, Social Media Sentiment and the Stock Market

B. Eierle, Sebastian Klamer, Matthias Muck
{"title":"Should Investors Consider the Sentiment of Online Discussions? An Analysis of the Link between Fundamental Information, Social Media Sentiment and the Stock Market","authors":"B. Eierle, Sebastian Klamer, Matthias Muck","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3875576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research analyses the link between fundamental information, social media sentiment, and stock returns from 2010 to 2018. We are interested in whether social media sentiment provides additional information to already published fundamental information, such as financial information and analysts forecasts. Therefore, we explore the relationship between fundamental information and sentiment. We find that unexpected earnings, analyst forecast revisions, new dividends, and 8-K filings have a significant impact on sentiment. We introduce the adjusted social media sentiment, which corrects social media sentiment for the impact of this fundamental information. It turns out that adjusted social media sentiment is related to the subsequent stock returns. Moreover, most of social media sentiment's total effect emerges from adjusted sentiment. In particular, stocks with negative sentiment tend to have negative subsequent short-term returns. It is, thus, important to distinguish between positive and negative sentiment. Subsequent long-term returns are more mildly affected suggesting that the impact of negative sentiment seems to be permanent.","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3875576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research analyses the link between fundamental information, social media sentiment, and stock returns from 2010 to 2018. We are interested in whether social media sentiment provides additional information to already published fundamental information, such as financial information and analysts forecasts. Therefore, we explore the relationship between fundamental information and sentiment. We find that unexpected earnings, analyst forecast revisions, new dividends, and 8-K filings have a significant impact on sentiment. We introduce the adjusted social media sentiment, which corrects social media sentiment for the impact of this fundamental information. It turns out that adjusted social media sentiment is related to the subsequent stock returns. Moreover, most of social media sentiment's total effect emerges from adjusted sentiment. In particular, stocks with negative sentiment tend to have negative subsequent short-term returns. It is, thus, important to distinguish between positive and negative sentiment. Subsequent long-term returns are more mildly affected suggesting that the impact of negative sentiment seems to be permanent.
投资者应该考虑网上讨论的情绪吗?基础信息、社交媒体情绪与股市的关系分析
本研究分析了2010年至2018年基本信息、社交媒体情绪和股票回报之间的联系。我们感兴趣的是,社交媒体情绪是否为已经发布的基本面信息(如财务信息和分析师预测)提供了额外的信息。因此,我们探索基本信息与情绪之间的关系。我们发现,意外收益、分析师预测修正、新股息和8-K文件对市场情绪有重大影响。我们引入调整后的社交媒体情绪,以纠正社交媒体情绪对这一基本信息的影响。事实证明,调整后的社交媒体情绪与随后的股票回报有关。此外,社交媒体情绪的总效应大部分来自于调整后的情绪。特别是,负面情绪的股票往往会有负的短期回报。因此,区分积极和消极情绪是很重要的。随后的长期回报受到的影响较为轻微,这表明负面情绪的影响似乎是永久性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信