The Impact of Rurality and Age on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Michigan Residents.

Innovations in Pharmacy Pub Date : 2023-10-10 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v14i1.5212
Katherine Bromm, Antoinette B Coe, Sarah E Vordenberg
{"title":"The Impact of Rurality and Age on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Michigan Residents.","authors":"Katherine Bromm, Antoinette B Coe, Sarah E Vordenberg","doi":"10.24926/iip.v14i1.5212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent cause of cancer-related deaths in Michigan, but not all Michigan adults had appropriate CRC screening. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the relationship between rurality and age on CRC screenings to inform how pharmacists could focus their efforts to educate, facilitate, or offer CRC health screenings. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2018 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (MiBRFSS) survey data. Michigan participants aged ≥ 50 years were included. Outcomes included the utilization of stool-based tests, sigmoidoscopies, colonoscopies, and the most recent CRC screening. Demographic variables included age, sex, income, race/ethnicity, relationship status, education level, employment status, income, rurality, and health insurance. Representative sampling weights were used to adjust for the complex survey design. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.0 was used and an a priori p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant. <b>Results:</b> A weighted total of 3,762,540 participants were included, of which 21.3% (n = 781,907) reported living in a rural area and approximately 70% (n = 2,616,646) were between the ages of 50-69 years old. Most participants reported being White, non-Hispanic (n = 3,104,117, 84.5%), having health insurance (n = 3,619,801, 96.4%), and having a colonoscopy (74.6%, n= 2,620,581). There was no difference based on rurality. Compared to those aged 50-59 years, adults 60-69 years (AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.58,2.45), 70-79 years (AOR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.40,4.51), and ≥ 80 years (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.54,3.24) had higher odds of receiving a colonoscopy. Lack of insurance was associated with lower odds of receiving a colonoscopy (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.56). <b>Conclusion:</b> Most participants reported having a CRC screening but efforts to increase CRC screening in Michigan adults aged 50-59 are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v14i1.5212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent cause of cancer-related deaths in Michigan, but not all Michigan adults had appropriate CRC screening. Objective: To assess the relationship between rurality and age on CRC screenings to inform how pharmacists could focus their efforts to educate, facilitate, or offer CRC health screenings. Methods: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study using 2018 Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (MiBRFSS) survey data. Michigan participants aged ≥ 50 years were included. Outcomes included the utilization of stool-based tests, sigmoidoscopies, colonoscopies, and the most recent CRC screening. Demographic variables included age, sex, income, race/ethnicity, relationship status, education level, employment status, income, rurality, and health insurance. Representative sampling weights were used to adjust for the complex survey design. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.0 was used and an a priori p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant. Results: A weighted total of 3,762,540 participants were included, of which 21.3% (n = 781,907) reported living in a rural area and approximately 70% (n = 2,616,646) were between the ages of 50-69 years old. Most participants reported being White, non-Hispanic (n = 3,104,117, 84.5%), having health insurance (n = 3,619,801, 96.4%), and having a colonoscopy (74.6%, n= 2,620,581). There was no difference based on rurality. Compared to those aged 50-59 years, adults 60-69 years (AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.58,2.45), 70-79 years (AOR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.40,4.51), and ≥ 80 years (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.54,3.24) had higher odds of receiving a colonoscopy. Lack of insurance was associated with lower odds of receiving a colonoscopy (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.56). Conclusion: Most participants reported having a CRC screening but efforts to increase CRC screening in Michigan adults aged 50-59 are warranted.

农村和年龄对密歇根州居民结直肠癌筛查的影响
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是密歇根州癌症相关死亡的普遍原因,但并非所有密歇根州成年人都进行了适当的CRC筛查。目的:评估农村和年龄在结直肠癌筛查中的关系,以告知药剂师如何集中精力教育、促进或提供结直肠癌健康筛查。方法:采用2018年密歇根州行为风险因素监测系统(MiBRFSS)调查数据进行回顾性横断面研究。密歇根的参与者年龄≥50岁。结果包括使用粪便检查、乙状结肠镜检查、结肠镜检查和最近的CRC筛查。人口统计变量包括年龄、性别、收入、种族/民族、关系状况、教育水平、就业状况、收入、农村状况和健康保险。使用代表性抽样权值来调整复杂的调查设计。描述性统计、卡方和多变量logistic回归分析。使用IBM SPSS 28.0.1.0版本,结果的先验p值:加权共纳入3,762,540名参与者,其中21.3% (n = 781,907)报告生活在农村地区,约70% (n = 2,616,646)年龄在50-69岁之间。大多数参与者报告为白人,非西班牙裔(n = 3,104,117, 84.5%),有健康保险(n = 3,619,801, 96.4%),并进行结肠镜检查(74.6%,n= 2,620,581)。没有基于农村的差异。与50-59岁的成年人相比,60-69岁(AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.58,2.45)、70-79岁(AOR = 3.29, 95% CI: 2.40,4.51)和≥80岁(AOR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.54,3.24)的成年人接受结肠镜检查的几率更高。缺乏保险与接受结肠镜检查的几率较低相关(AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.56)。结论:大多数参与者报告有CRC筛查,但努力增加密歇根州50-59岁成年人的CRC筛查是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信