Hearing, Language, and General School Performance in Children with Cleft Lip/Palate Waiting for Alveolar and Hard Palate Reconstruction at the Age of Mixed Dentition
{"title":"Hearing, Language, and General School Performance in Children with Cleft Lip/Palate Waiting for Alveolar and Hard Palate Reconstruction at the Age of Mixed Dentition","authors":"Blanca Isabel Pérez Hernández, Hilda González Olivares, Aline Berenice Herrera Rangel, Belma Jessica Lamas González, Kathrine Jáuregui-Renaud","doi":"10.1159/000531394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to assess hearing, language, and school performance in children with cleft lip/palate waiting for alveolar and hard palate reconstruction at the age of mixed dentition, compared to age-matched children with no birth anomalies. Methods: Forty-four children aged 8–12 years participated in the study (22 with/22 without cleft). After tympanometry and audiometry, a short in-house questionnaire was administered to their guardians to record data on school performance. Then, assessments were performed on velopharyngeal competency, intelligibility, language, and reading/writing skills. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed with p value set at 0.05. Results: Middle ear function, language, and school performance of children with cleft lip/palate were worse than that of children without cleft, particularly on spelling and phoneme-grapheme correspondence. Among children with cleft lip/palate, about half of the variability on the average school notes was related to their results on phonemic synthesis and spelling tests (ANCoVA, R2 = 0.52, p = 0.003), while the spelling results were related to the hearing thresholds (ANCoVA, R2 = 0.39, p = 0.01), regardless if the cleft was unilateral or bilateral. Conclusion: In children with cleft lip/palate, late alveolar and hard palate reconstruction may have an impact on hearing, language development, and performance at school.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess hearing, language, and school performance in children with cleft lip/palate waiting for alveolar and hard palate reconstruction at the age of mixed dentition, compared to age-matched children with no birth anomalies. Methods: Forty-four children aged 8–12 years participated in the study (22 with/22 without cleft). After tympanometry and audiometry, a short in-house questionnaire was administered to their guardians to record data on school performance. Then, assessments were performed on velopharyngeal competency, intelligibility, language, and reading/writing skills. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed with p value set at 0.05. Results: Middle ear function, language, and school performance of children with cleft lip/palate were worse than that of children without cleft, particularly on spelling and phoneme-grapheme correspondence. Among children with cleft lip/palate, about half of the variability on the average school notes was related to their results on phonemic synthesis and spelling tests (ANCoVA, R2 = 0.52, p = 0.003), while the spelling results were related to the hearing thresholds (ANCoVA, R2 = 0.39, p = 0.01), regardless if the cleft was unilateral or bilateral. Conclusion: In children with cleft lip/palate, late alveolar and hard palate reconstruction may have an impact on hearing, language development, and performance at school.