Opinions and practices among providers regarding sexual function

Caroline Leonard MD , Rebecca G Rogers MD
{"title":"Opinions and practices among providers regarding sexual function","authors":"Caroline Leonard MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca G Rogers MD","doi":"10.1016/S1068-607X(02)00121-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a paucity of current literature exploring provider attitudes toward discussing sexual function in routine gynecological care. Our objective in this study was to evaluate provider attitudes about the importance of taking a sexual history, and perceived barriers to doing so. Additionally, we evaluated whether patients consider a sexual function history important to their care. Residents, attending physicians, and midwives at the University of New Mexico completed anonymous questionnaires, including demographic data as well as questions regarding attitudes and practices toward taking a sexual history. Patients presenting for routine gynecological care were asked what their expectations are of their provider in taking a sexual history. Despite demographic differences, all providers reported that time limitations and language barriers were the main reasons why they don’t ask patients about their sexual function. The majority of providers reported that they seldom know where to refer patients with sexual dysfunction. All providers underestimated the percentage of women having sexual dysfunction compared with the literature (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Both patients and providers agreed that asking questions about patient’s sex lives was important to patient care (<em>P</em> = .61). Patients felt that it was important for providers to ask specific detailed questions about their sexual function. We concluded that lack of time and language barriers were the two commonly cited reasons for the inability of providers to complete a sexual history. Additionally, all providers had inadequate education about where to refer patients with sexual dysfunction. Strategies to improve providers’ ability to elicit and manage sexual dysfunction might include education regarding concise but validated sexual history interview techniques, simple treatment paradigms, and education regarding referral.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80301,"journal":{"name":"Primary care update for Ob/Gyns","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1068-607X(02)00121-X","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care update for Ob/Gyns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1068607X0200121X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

There is a paucity of current literature exploring provider attitudes toward discussing sexual function in routine gynecological care. Our objective in this study was to evaluate provider attitudes about the importance of taking a sexual history, and perceived barriers to doing so. Additionally, we evaluated whether patients consider a sexual function history important to their care. Residents, attending physicians, and midwives at the University of New Mexico completed anonymous questionnaires, including demographic data as well as questions regarding attitudes and practices toward taking a sexual history. Patients presenting for routine gynecological care were asked what their expectations are of their provider in taking a sexual history. Despite demographic differences, all providers reported that time limitations and language barriers were the main reasons why they don’t ask patients about their sexual function. The majority of providers reported that they seldom know where to refer patients with sexual dysfunction. All providers underestimated the percentage of women having sexual dysfunction compared with the literature (P < .001). Both patients and providers agreed that asking questions about patient’s sex lives was important to patient care (P = .61). Patients felt that it was important for providers to ask specific detailed questions about their sexual function. We concluded that lack of time and language barriers were the two commonly cited reasons for the inability of providers to complete a sexual history. Additionally, all providers had inadequate education about where to refer patients with sexual dysfunction. Strategies to improve providers’ ability to elicit and manage sexual dysfunction might include education regarding concise but validated sexual history interview techniques, simple treatment paradigms, and education regarding referral.

提供者关于性功能的意见和做法
目前缺乏文献探讨提供者对在常规妇科护理中讨论性功能的态度。我们在这项研究中的目的是评估提供者对记录性史的重要性的态度,以及认为这样做的障碍。此外,我们评估了患者是否认为性功能史对他们的护理很重要。新墨西哥大学的住院医生、主治医生和助产士完成了匿名调查问卷,包括人口统计数据以及有关性史态度和行为的问题。接受常规妇科护理的患者被问及他们对性生活史的期望是什么。尽管存在人口统计学上的差异,但所有的医生都报告说,时间限制和语言障碍是他们不询问患者性功能的主要原因。大多数提供者报告说,他们很少知道将性功能障碍患者转介到哪里。与文献相比,所有提供者都低估了女性性功能障碍的比例(P <措施)。病人和医生都认为询问病人的性生活对病人的护理很重要(P = .61)。患者认为,提供者询问有关其性功能的具体细节问题很重要。我们得出的结论是,缺乏时间和语言障碍是提供者无法完成性史的两个常见原因。此外,所有的医疗服务提供者对性功能障碍患者的转诊教育不足。提高提供者诱导和管理性功能障碍的能力的策略可能包括关于简洁但有效的性史访谈技巧的教育,简单的治疗范例,以及关于转诊的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信