Does the position of the drains after open heart surgery make a difference? A clinical randomized trial

Ali M. Refat, Amir Abdelsayed
{"title":"Does the position of the drains after open heart surgery make a difference? A clinical randomized trial","authors":"Ali M. Refat,&nbsp;Amir Abdelsayed","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pericardial effusion remains a common clinical problem after cardiac surgery. Adequate postoperative drainage can be obtained by posterior pericardial drainage through a posterior tube, along with conventional drainage of the anterior mediastinum.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three hundred patients, who underwent cardiac surgery, were enrolled in a prospectively randomized study. Group A (150 patients) had two retrosternal drains and group B (150 patients) had two retrosternal drains, one retrosternal and one retro-cardiac.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Early pericardial effusion developed in 5 (3.4%) patients in group A and 2 (2.9%) in group B (<em>P</em> = <em>0.76</em>). Early posterior pericardial effusion occurred in 5 (3.4%) patients of group A whereas no patients had early posterior pericardial effusion in Group B (<em>P</em> = <em>0.024</em>). Fourteen (9.5%) patients from group A had late posterior pericardial effusion, compared to 1 (0.7%) patient from group B (<em>P = 0.001</em>). Three patients from group A had late posterior cardiac tamponade whereas no patients from group B had late posterior cardiac tamponade (<em>P = 0.013</em>).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of a drain placed in the posterior pericardial cavity is simple and safe and appears to be sufficient for posterior drainage. This reduces not only the high incidence of late significant pericardial effusion but also reduce early pericardial effusion and tamponade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 281-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.10.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X18301068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background

Pericardial effusion remains a common clinical problem after cardiac surgery. Adequate postoperative drainage can be obtained by posterior pericardial drainage through a posterior tube, along with conventional drainage of the anterior mediastinum.

Methods

Three hundred patients, who underwent cardiac surgery, were enrolled in a prospectively randomized study. Group A (150 patients) had two retrosternal drains and group B (150 patients) had two retrosternal drains, one retrosternal and one retro-cardiac.

Results

Early pericardial effusion developed in 5 (3.4%) patients in group A and 2 (2.9%) in group B (P = 0.76). Early posterior pericardial effusion occurred in 5 (3.4%) patients of group A whereas no patients had early posterior pericardial effusion in Group B (P = 0.024). Fourteen (9.5%) patients from group A had late posterior pericardial effusion, compared to 1 (0.7%) patient from group B (P = 0.001). Three patients from group A had late posterior cardiac tamponade whereas no patients from group B had late posterior cardiac tamponade (P = 0.013).

Conclusions

The use of a drain placed in the posterior pericardial cavity is simple and safe and appears to be sufficient for posterior drainage. This reduces not only the high incidence of late significant pericardial effusion but also reduce early pericardial effusion and tamponade.

心内直视手术后引流管的位置有影响吗?一项临床随机试验
心包积液是心脏手术后常见的临床问题。术后可通过后路心包引流及常规前纵隔引流获得充分的引流。方法300例接受心脏手术的患者被纳入前瞻性随机研究。A组(150例)有两条胸骨后引流管,B组(150例)有两条胸骨后引流管,一条胸骨后引流管,一条心后引流管。结果A组早期出现心包积液5例(3.4%),B组2例(2.9%)(P = 0.76)。A组有5例(3.4%)出现早期心包积液,B组无早期心包积液(P = 0.024)。A组14例(9.5%)患者有晚期后心包积液,B组1例(0.7%)患者有晚期后心包积液(P = 0.001)。A组有3例发生迟发性心后填塞,B组无迟发性心后填塞(P = 0.013)。结论在心包后腔放置引流管简单、安全,可满足后路引流的需要。这不仅减少了晚期显著心包积液的高发,而且减少了早期心包积液和心包填塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信