Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release

Jae Kwang Kim, Jinhee Park, Y. Shin, Jinseok Yang, Ho Yeon Kim
{"title":"Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release","authors":"Jae Kwang Kim, Jinhee Park, Y. Shin, Jinseok Yang, Ho Yeon Kim","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to analyze the reliability and validity of the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Withey score after syndactyly release. Over a 3-year period, 13 patients who underwent syndactyly release were evaluated. The mean age at the time of syndactyly release was 12 months (range, 8–18 months), and the mean follow-up period was 29 months (range, 17–52 months). We obtained hand photographs and finger motion videos and collected the satisfaction scores for hand function and cosmesis. Three clinicians evaluated the hand photographs and finger motion video of each patient twice using the VSS and the Withey score. The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of the VSS and Withey score were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The validity of the VSS and Withey score was determined using Spearman’s correlation test with the functional and cosmetic satisfaction score. The ICCs for the interobserver reliability of VSS were 0.31 and 0.39 for each measurement, and ICCs for the intraobserver reliability of VSS were 0.46, 0.51, and 0.54 for each observer. The ICCs for the interobserver reliability of the Withey score were 0.74 and 0.70, and the ICCs for the intraobserver reliability of the Withey score were 0.91, 0.74, and 0.96. The Withey score was significantly correlated with the satisfaction score for hand function and hand cosmesis, but the VSS was not. The VSS had poor interobserver reliability and fair intraobserver reliability, whereas the Withey score had good interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability based on photographic evaluation after syndactyly release.","PeriodicalId":16709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the reliability and validity of the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Withey score after syndactyly release. Over a 3-year period, 13 patients who underwent syndactyly release were evaluated. The mean age at the time of syndactyly release was 12 months (range, 8–18 months), and the mean follow-up period was 29 months (range, 17–52 months). We obtained hand photographs and finger motion videos and collected the satisfaction scores for hand function and cosmesis. Three clinicians evaluated the hand photographs and finger motion video of each patient twice using the VSS and the Withey score. The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of the VSS and Withey score were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The validity of the VSS and Withey score was determined using Spearman’s correlation test with the functional and cosmetic satisfaction score. The ICCs for the interobserver reliability of VSS were 0.31 and 0.39 for each measurement, and ICCs for the intraobserver reliability of VSS were 0.46, 0.51, and 0.54 for each observer. The ICCs for the interobserver reliability of the Withey score were 0.74 and 0.70, and the ICCs for the intraobserver reliability of the Withey score were 0.91, 0.74, and 0.96. The Withey score was significantly correlated with the satisfaction score for hand function and hand cosmesis, but the VSS was not. The VSS had poor interobserver reliability and fair intraobserver reliability, whereas the Withey score had good interobserver reliability and excellent intraobserver reliability based on photographic evaluation after syndactyly release.
并指释放后温哥华疤痕量表和Withey评分的信度和效度
本研究旨在分析并指释放后的温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)和Withey评分的信度和效度。在3年的时间里,对13例接受并指松解的患者进行了评估。并指解除时的平均年龄为12个月(8-18个月),平均随访时间为29个月(17-52个月)。我们获得了手部照片和手指运动视频,并收集了手功能和美容满意度评分。三位临床医生使用VSS和Withey评分对每位患者的手部照片和手指运动视频进行了两次评估。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)确定VSS和Withey评分的观察者间和观察者内信度。VSS和Withey评分的效度采用Spearman与功能和美容满意度评分的相关检验确定。每次测量的VSS的观察者间信度ICCs分别为0.31和0.39,每个观察者的VSS的观察者内信度ICCs分别为0.46、0.51和0.54。Withey评分的观察者间信度ICCs分别为0.74和0.70,Withey评分的观察者内信度ICCs分别为0.91、0.74和0.96。Withey得分与手功能、手妆满意度得分显著相关,而VSS得分与手妆满意度得分无显著相关。VSS评分的观察者间信度较差,观察者内信度一般,而Withey评分的观察者间信度较好,同时释放后基于照片评价的观察者内信度较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信