{"title":"Eucharistic sacrifice and patristic tradition in the theology of Martin Bucer 1534–1546","authors":"Joe Mock","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2018.1532741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"material culture studies dominating the landscape of current Reformation historiography (expressed, for example, in the Remembering the Reformation project and conference) and early-modern studies in general. The illustrated volume is carefully edited, with short indices of geographical names and persons (535–547), but it lacks a cumulative bibliography as well as notes on the contributors (that might have been helpful to identify their theological backgrounds and thus enable a more critical evaluation of their research). Luther and Calvinism recommends itself to everyone interested in the manifold research opportunities on Reformed receptions of Lutheranism from theological and historical perspectives.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"11 1","pages":"261 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2018.1532741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
material culture studies dominating the landscape of current Reformation historiography (expressed, for example, in the Remembering the Reformation project and conference) and early-modern studies in general. The illustrated volume is carefully edited, with short indices of geographical names and persons (535–547), but it lacks a cumulative bibliography as well as notes on the contributors (that might have been helpful to identify their theological backgrounds and thus enable a more critical evaluation of their research). Luther and Calvinism recommends itself to everyone interested in the manifold research opportunities on Reformed receptions of Lutheranism from theological and historical perspectives.