{"title":"TRANSITION FROM PRONE TO SUPINE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITOTOMY: EVALUATING THE LEARNING CURVE FROM THE SINGLE SURGEON EXPERIENCE","authors":"Z. Ali, A. Afriansyah","doi":"10.32421/JURI.V28I2.680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the urologist to perform supine PCNL and the perioperative outcome of patients based on a single surgeon’s experience. Material & Methods: 60 consecutive patients who underwent modified supine PCNL for renal stone were analyzed. A single experienced urological surgeon performed the supine PCNL. Mean operative time, drop in hemoglobin level, stone-free rate, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed to evaluate the learning curve of the surgeon. All parameters were compared among all six groups obtained from the 60 cases in chronological order. Besides, the outcomes of supine PCNL were also compared to prone PCNL. Results: Mean operative time from 60 cases of supine PCNL was 100 ± 27 minutes. The mean operative time was decreased over time, particularly after 20 cases. Significantly different mean operative times (89 ± 14 minutes vs. 126 ± 21 minutes, p < 0.001) in the groups of cases 21-60 compared to the group of 1–20 cases were observed. The total stone-free rate for supine PCNL from all cases was 68%. There was no difference regarding the reduction of hemoglobin level, stone-free rate, hospital stay, and complication rate. No major complication was found among study subjects. Supine PCNL showed similar outcome parameters compared to prone PCNL. Conclusion: The surgeon acquired the surgical competencies to perform supine PCNL after 20 cases. The supine PCNL could remove the kidney stone as effective and safe as prone PCNL.","PeriodicalId":13565,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32421/JURI.V28I2.680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the learning curve of the urologist to perform supine PCNL and the perioperative outcome of patients based on a single surgeon’s experience. Material & Methods: 60 consecutive patients who underwent modified supine PCNL for renal stone were analyzed. A single experienced urological surgeon performed the supine PCNL. Mean operative time, drop in hemoglobin level, stone-free rate, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed to evaluate the learning curve of the surgeon. All parameters were compared among all six groups obtained from the 60 cases in chronological order. Besides, the outcomes of supine PCNL were also compared to prone PCNL. Results: Mean operative time from 60 cases of supine PCNL was 100 ± 27 minutes. The mean operative time was decreased over time, particularly after 20 cases. Significantly different mean operative times (89 ± 14 minutes vs. 126 ± 21 minutes, p < 0.001) in the groups of cases 21-60 compared to the group of 1–20 cases were observed. The total stone-free rate for supine PCNL from all cases was 68%. There was no difference regarding the reduction of hemoglobin level, stone-free rate, hospital stay, and complication rate. No major complication was found among study subjects. Supine PCNL showed similar outcome parameters compared to prone PCNL. Conclusion: The surgeon acquired the surgical competencies to perform supine PCNL after 20 cases. The supine PCNL could remove the kidney stone as effective and safe as prone PCNL.
目的:本研究旨在评估泌尿科医师仰卧位PCNL的学习曲线和基于单一外科医生经验的患者围手术期预后。材料与方法:对60例连续行改良仰卧PCNL治疗肾结石的患者进行分析。由一名经验丰富的泌尿外科医生进行仰卧位PCNL。分析平均手术时间、血红蛋白水平下降、结石清除率、并发症和住院时间,以评估外科医生的学习曲线。按时间顺序比较从60例中获得的所有六组的所有参数。此外,还比较了仰卧位PCNL与俯卧位PCNL的预后。结果:60例仰卧PCNL平均手术时间为100±27分钟。平均手术时间随着时间的推移而减少,特别是在20例之后。21 ~ 60例组与1 ~ 20例组的平均手术时间(89±14 min vs 126±21 min, p < 0.001)差异有统计学意义。所有病例中仰卧位PCNL的总无石率为68%。两组在血红蛋白水平降低、无结石率、住院时间和并发症发生率方面均无差异。研究对象中未发现重大并发症。仰卧位PCNL与俯卧位PCNL的结局参数相似。结论:经过20例手术,术者已具备进行仰卧位PCNL的手术能力。仰卧位取石术与俯卧位取石术一样安全有效。