On the Complexity of Hazard-free Circuits

Christian Ikenmeyer, Balagopal Komarath, C. Lenzen, Vladimir Lysikov, A. Mokhov, Karteek Sreenivasaiah
{"title":"On the Complexity of Hazard-free Circuits","authors":"Christian Ikenmeyer, Balagopal Komarath, C. Lenzen, Vladimir Lysikov, A. Mokhov, Karteek Sreenivasaiah","doi":"10.1145/3320123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazard-free implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for depth 2 circuits. The same proof method yields that every subcubic implementation of Boolean matrix multiplication must have hazards. These results follow from a crucial structural insight: Hazard-free complexity is a natural generalization of monotone complexity to all (not necessarily monotone) Boolean functions. Thus, we can apply known monotone complexity lower bounds to find lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity. We also lift these methods from the monotone setting to prove exponential hazard-free complexity lower bounds for non-monotone functions. As our main upper-bound result, we show how to efficiently convert a Boolean circuit into a bounded-bit hazard-free circuit with only a polynomially large blow-up in the number of gates. Previously, the best known method yielded exponentially large circuits in the worst case, so our algorithm gives an exponential improvement. As a side result, we establish the NP-completeness of several hazard detection problems.","PeriodicalId":17199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","volume":"4 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ACM (JACM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3320123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazard-free implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for depth 2 circuits. The same proof method yields that every subcubic implementation of Boolean matrix multiplication must have hazards. These results follow from a crucial structural insight: Hazard-free complexity is a natural generalization of monotone complexity to all (not necessarily monotone) Boolean functions. Thus, we can apply known monotone complexity lower bounds to find lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity. We also lift these methods from the monotone setting to prove exponential hazard-free complexity lower bounds for non-monotone functions. As our main upper-bound result, we show how to efficiently convert a Boolean circuit into a bounded-bit hazard-free circuit with only a polynomially large blow-up in the number of gates. Previously, the best known method yielded exponentially large circuits in the worst case, so our algorithm gives an exponential improvement. As a side result, we establish the NP-completeness of several hazard detection problems.
关于无危险电路的复杂性
构造无危险布尔电路的问题可以追溯到20世纪40年代,是电路设计中的一个重要问题。我们的主要下界结果无条件地证明了电路复杂度是多项式有界的函数的存在性,而每个无害化实现都是指数大小的。之前关于无危险复杂度的下界只对深度为2的电路有效。同样的证明方法得出,布尔矩阵乘法的每一个次立方实现都有危险。这些结果来自于一个关键的结构洞察力:无危险复杂性是单调复杂性对所有(不一定是单调的)布尔函数的自然推广。因此,我们可以应用已知的单调复杂度下界来求无危险复杂度的下界。我们还将这些方法从单调集合中提出来,证明了非单调函数的指数无危险复杂度下界。作为我们的主要上界结果,我们展示了如何有效地将布尔电路转换为有界位无危险电路,仅在门的数量上出现多项式大的爆炸。以前,最著名的方法在最坏的情况下产生指数级的大电路,因此我们的算法给出了指数级的改进。作为附带结果,我们建立了几个危害检测问题的np完备性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信