Contribution to the study of antimicrobial prophylaxis in third molar extraction surgeries

Caroline Degasperi Baú, Paulo Sérgio Batista
{"title":"Contribution to the study of antimicrobial prophylaxis in third molar extraction surgeries","authors":"Caroline Degasperi Baú, Paulo Sérgio Batista","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372023001320220055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the extraction of third molars is extremely controversial, raising several discussions about the most appropriate clinical protocol to avoid postoperative complications. To review the literature on the subject, describing the evidence for and against antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections in third molar extractions, besides establishing a prophylactic protocol and dosage regimen. A literature review was carried out analyzing scientific evidence from articles on the PubMed and Scielo platforms by searching for the descriptors “antibiotic therapy and infection in third molar extraction surgery”, “antimicrobial prophylaxis and infective endocarditis”, “antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse effects”, “antibiotic therapy in dentistry”, “surgical time and incidence of infections in extractions”, including original articles and double or triple blind randomized clinical trials, in Portuguese and English, published between 1980 and 2021, separated in chronological order. There is no consensus in the literature on the indication of antimicrobial prophylaxis, but factors as surgeon’s skill, time elapsed during the procedure and the patient’s general health status directly affect the incidence and severity of infections. Among all the literature analyzed for this study, it is possible to infer that the topic is still extremely questionable and, therefore, it is essential to conduct new experimental studies to obtain more conclusive data on the subject.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372023001320220055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the extraction of third molars is extremely controversial, raising several discussions about the most appropriate clinical protocol to avoid postoperative complications. To review the literature on the subject, describing the evidence for and against antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infections in third molar extractions, besides establishing a prophylactic protocol and dosage regimen. A literature review was carried out analyzing scientific evidence from articles on the PubMed and Scielo platforms by searching for the descriptors “antibiotic therapy and infection in third molar extraction surgery”, “antimicrobial prophylaxis and infective endocarditis”, “antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse effects”, “antibiotic therapy in dentistry”, “surgical time and incidence of infections in extractions”, including original articles and double or triple blind randomized clinical trials, in Portuguese and English, published between 1980 and 2021, separated in chronological order. There is no consensus in the literature on the indication of antimicrobial prophylaxis, but factors as surgeon’s skill, time elapsed during the procedure and the patient’s general health status directly affect the incidence and severity of infections. Among all the literature analyzed for this study, it is possible to infer that the topic is still extremely questionable and, therefore, it is essential to conduct new experimental studies to obtain more conclusive data on the subject.
对第三磨牙拔牙手术抗菌预防研究的贡献
在拔除第三磨牙时使用抗生素预防是极具争议的,提出了一些关于避免术后并发症的最合适临床方案的讨论。回顾这方面的文献,描述支持和反对抗生素预防第三磨牙拔牙手术部位感染的证据,以及建立预防方案和给药方案。通过检索“第三磨牙拔牙手术中的抗生素治疗和感染”、“抗菌预防和感染性心内膜炎”、“抗生素预防和不良反应”、“牙科中的抗生素治疗”、“拔牙手术时间和感染发生率”等描述词,对PubMed和Scielo平台上的文章进行文献综述,分析科学证据,包括原创文章和双盲或三盲随机临床试验。葡萄牙语和英语,出版于1980年至2021年之间,按时间顺序分开。关于抗菌素预防的适应症,文献中没有一致的意见,但外科医生的技能、手术过程中经过的时间和患者的一般健康状况等因素直接影响感染的发生率和严重程度。在本研究分析的所有文献中,可以推断出该主题仍然非常值得怀疑,因此,有必要进行新的实验研究以获得关于该主题的更结论性数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信