Complejidad del intercambio, la dependencia de recursos y la subcontratación a largo plazo de servicios de I+D

Andrea Martínez-Noya, Esteban García-Canal
{"title":"Complejidad del intercambio, la dependencia de recursos y la subcontratación a largo plazo de servicios de I+D","authors":"Andrea Martínez-Noya,&nbsp;Esteban García-Canal","doi":"10.1016/S1019-6838(12)70006-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze the preference of technological firms for long-term relationships, instead of short-term contracts, as they engage in R&amp;D outsourcing agreements with external partners. We draw from transaction cost theory and resource dependence theory to argue that this choice will be mainly determined by the attributes of the R&amp;D service outsourced, and the company's need to secure the availability of external resources on a long-term basis. Using original international survey data on 90 R&amp;D outsourcing agreements by European and U.S. companies operating in technology-intensive industries, we find that long-term relationships are preferred when the attributes of asset-specificity and frequency are present and when the level of resource dependence between the exchange parties increases. On the other hand, companies seem to prefer short-term contracts in order to follow a flexible R&amp;D sourcing strategy. This preference appears to be higher for those companies that are more technologically competent, and when the underlying motive for outsourcing the R&amp;D service is increasing operational flexibility, or overcoming the liability of foreignness when entering new markets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101112,"journal":{"name":"Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa","volume":"21 2","pages":"Pages 191-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1019-6838(12)70006-9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1019683812700069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We analyze the preference of technological firms for long-term relationships, instead of short-term contracts, as they engage in R&D outsourcing agreements with external partners. We draw from transaction cost theory and resource dependence theory to argue that this choice will be mainly determined by the attributes of the R&D service outsourced, and the company's need to secure the availability of external resources on a long-term basis. Using original international survey data on 90 R&D outsourcing agreements by European and U.S. companies operating in technology-intensive industries, we find that long-term relationships are preferred when the attributes of asset-specificity and frequency are present and when the level of resource dependence between the exchange parties increases. On the other hand, companies seem to prefer short-term contracts in order to follow a flexible R&D sourcing strategy. This preference appears to be higher for those companies that are more technologically competent, and when the underlying motive for outsourcing the R&D service is increasing operational flexibility, or overcoming the liability of foreignness when entering new markets.

交换的复杂性、对资源的依赖和研发服务的长期分包
我们分析了科技公司在与外部合作伙伴签订研发外包协议时,对长期关系的偏好,而不是短期合同。我们借鉴交易成本理论和资源依赖理论,认为这一选择主要取决于外包研发服务的属性,以及企业确保外部资源长期可用性的需要。通过对90家从事技术密集型产业的欧美公司研发外包协议的原始国际调查数据,我们发现,当资产专用性和频率属性存在,且交易双方之间的资源依赖程度增加时,长期合作关系更受青睐。另一方面,公司似乎更喜欢短期合同,以遵循灵活的研发采购策略。对于那些技术能力更强的公司,以及当外包研发服务的潜在动机是增加操作灵活性,或在进入新市场时克服外国的责任时,这种偏好似乎更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信