Planning Transit-Oriented Development (TOD): A Systematic Literature Review of Measuring the Transit-Oriented Development Levels

Q3 Engineering
S. Ibrahim, H. Ayad, D. Saadallah
{"title":"Planning Transit-Oriented Development (TOD): A Systematic Literature Review of Measuring the Transit-Oriented Development Levels","authors":"S. Ibrahim, H. Ayad, D. Saadallah","doi":"10.2495/tdi-v6-n4-378-398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent decades have witnessed a growing trend towards transit-oriented development (TOd) to achieve sustainable development through maintaining the integration between land use and transport systems. it is believed that measuring the TOd level ‘TOd-ness’ is important for TOd planning. however, it has been found that the spatial studies and quantitative methods that comprehensively measure TOd-ness are still limited. furthermore, some meth-ods do not have standard frameworks, and they vary according to the research context and orientation. accordingly, the major focus of this paper is related to the multi-criteria decision making (mcdm), quantitative measuring methods that prioritize potential areas for intervention. Based on a systematic review, this paper aims to evaluate the existing studies published between 2000 and 2020 in relation to TOd-ness measurement and its operationalization. This systematic review is an attempt to present the dominant methodologies used and analyse their pros and cons. accordingly, the paper introduces a theoretical review of the TOd concept, its evolution and methods employed from the previous studies. Then, an analytical review is conducted for the eligible records, that are extracted from eight databases according to certain criteria. finally, it is expected that the outcomes of the research will provide insight for further studies, in addition to presenting the best-adopted methods and assisting in developing mcdm models that measure TOd-ness quantitively.","PeriodicalId":52274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Development and Integration","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Development and Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/tdi-v6-n4-378-398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The recent decades have witnessed a growing trend towards transit-oriented development (TOd) to achieve sustainable development through maintaining the integration between land use and transport systems. it is believed that measuring the TOd level ‘TOd-ness’ is important for TOd planning. however, it has been found that the spatial studies and quantitative methods that comprehensively measure TOd-ness are still limited. furthermore, some meth-ods do not have standard frameworks, and they vary according to the research context and orientation. accordingly, the major focus of this paper is related to the multi-criteria decision making (mcdm), quantitative measuring methods that prioritize potential areas for intervention. Based on a systematic review, this paper aims to evaluate the existing studies published between 2000 and 2020 in relation to TOd-ness measurement and its operationalization. This systematic review is an attempt to present the dominant methodologies used and analyse their pros and cons. accordingly, the paper introduces a theoretical review of the TOd concept, its evolution and methods employed from the previous studies. Then, an analytical review is conducted for the eligible records, that are extracted from eight databases according to certain criteria. finally, it is expected that the outcomes of the research will provide insight for further studies, in addition to presenting the best-adopted methods and assisting in developing mcdm models that measure TOd-ness quantitively.
规划公交导向发展(TOD):衡量公交导向发展水平的系统文献综述
近几十年来,以交通为导向的发展(TOd)的趋势日益增长,通过保持土地利用和运输系统之间的一体化来实现可持续发展。认为衡量TOd水平的“TOd ness”对TOd规划具有重要意义。然而,综合测度tod度的空间研究和定量方法仍然有限。此外,一些方法没有标准的框架,根据研究背景和方向而有所不同。因此,本文的主要重点是与多准则决策(mcdm)有关,这是一种量化的测量方法,可以优先考虑潜在的干预领域。本文在系统回顾的基础上,对2000年至2020年间发表的有关TOd-ness测量及其操作化的研究进行了评价。本文对TOd概念、其演变过程和以往研究中采用的方法进行了理论回顾,并对其优缺点进行了分析。然后,对符合条件的记录进行分析审查,这些记录是根据某些标准从八个数据库中提取的。最后,除了提出最佳采用方法和协助开发定量测量TOd-ness的mcdm模型外,预计研究结果将为进一步的研究提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信