Contexts and Temporalities in Andrew Abbott's Processual Sociology

M. Jouvenet
{"title":"Contexts and Temporalities in Andrew Abbott's Processual Sociology","authors":"M. Jouvenet","doi":"10.1017/S2398568218000067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1970s, Andrew Abbott has promoted an original and ambitious project for the social sciences. In particular, he has argued for the development of a “processual sociology” based on precepts first articulated by the Chicago tradition of sociology and in his view somewhat forgotten. Against functionalism, against the “variables paradigm,” he has emphasized the Chicago tradition's focus on patterns of interaction and their contexts, and has deepened our analysis of the local and ever-particular dimensions of social entities by considering their inscription in successive sequences. As well as seeking to formalize these sequences, this vision aims to link processes playing out at different rhythms and levels. As a project it is based on a conception of social life as a “world of events,” where “change is the normal nature of things” and “not something that happens occasionally to stable social actors.” This makes it possible to explain the emergence and durability of social entities (for example, professions and disciplines) in the flow of events. The originality of this approach consists in founding a new institutionalist analysis of social realities on this ontology of perpetual movement. Marked by American pragmatism but also traversed by the question of order and social structures, Abbott's oeuvre offers an original approach to the diversity of contexts and temporalities in processes that, through the intermingling of various “lineages,” constitute social traditions and entities. This article presents Abbott's contextualist theses and the intellectual background against which they emerged. It also considers the place that the processual approach accords to contingency and personhood, factors that enable Abbot to work toward a synthesis of history and sociology.","PeriodicalId":86691,"journal":{"name":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","volume":"39 1","pages":"361 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Nestle [English ed.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398568218000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1970s, Andrew Abbott has promoted an original and ambitious project for the social sciences. In particular, he has argued for the development of a “processual sociology” based on precepts first articulated by the Chicago tradition of sociology and in his view somewhat forgotten. Against functionalism, against the “variables paradigm,” he has emphasized the Chicago tradition's focus on patterns of interaction and their contexts, and has deepened our analysis of the local and ever-particular dimensions of social entities by considering their inscription in successive sequences. As well as seeking to formalize these sequences, this vision aims to link processes playing out at different rhythms and levels. As a project it is based on a conception of social life as a “world of events,” where “change is the normal nature of things” and “not something that happens occasionally to stable social actors.” This makes it possible to explain the emergence and durability of social entities (for example, professions and disciplines) in the flow of events. The originality of this approach consists in founding a new institutionalist analysis of social realities on this ontology of perpetual movement. Marked by American pragmatism but also traversed by the question of order and social structures, Abbott's oeuvre offers an original approach to the diversity of contexts and temporalities in processes that, through the intermingling of various “lineages,” constitute social traditions and entities. This article presents Abbott's contextualist theses and the intellectual background against which they emerged. It also considers the place that the processual approach accords to contingency and personhood, factors that enable Abbot to work toward a synthesis of history and sociology.
安德鲁·阿伯特过程社会学中的语境与时间性
自20世纪70年代以来,安德鲁·阿博特(Andrew Abbott)一直在推动一个具有原创性和雄心勃勃的社会科学项目。特别是,他主张发展一种“过程社会学”,其基础是芝加哥社会学传统首先提出的、在他看来有些被遗忘的戒律。反对功能主义,反对“变量范式”,他强调了芝加哥传统对互动模式及其背景的关注,并通过考虑它们在连续序列中的铭文,加深了我们对社会实体的局部和永远特定维度的分析。除了寻求这些序列的形式化,这个愿景的目的是将不同节奏和水平的过程联系起来。作为一个项目,它基于这样一个概念:社会生活是一个“事件的世界”,其中“变化是事物的正常性质”,而“不是偶尔发生在稳定的社会参与者身上的事情”。这使得解释社会实体(例如,职业和学科)在事件流中的出现和持久性成为可能。这种方法的独创性在于建立了一种新的制度主义的分析社会现实的本体论的永恒运动。阿博特的作品以美国实用主义为标志,同时也贯穿着秩序和社会结构的问题。阿博特的作品提供了一种新颖的方法,通过各种“血统”的混合,构成了社会传统和实体,探讨了过程中的背景和时间性的多样性。本文介绍了阿博特的语境主义论点及其产生的思想背景。它还考虑了过程方法符合偶然性和人格的地方,这些因素使Abbot能够朝着历史和社会学的综合方向努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信