Improving access to mental health services for those experiencing multiple disadvantage

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Rachel Moreton, J. Welford, Beth Collinson, Laura Greason, Chris Milner
{"title":"Improving access to mental health services for those experiencing multiple disadvantage","authors":"Rachel Moreton, J. Welford, Beth Collinson, Laura Greason, Chris Milner","doi":"10.1108/hcs-04-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the barriers to accessing mental health support for people experiencing multiple disadvantage along with some potential solutions for attempting to overcome these. It draws on evidence and learning from 12 voluntary sector-led partnerships in England funded by the National Lottery Community Fund’s Fulfilling Lives programme.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nQualitative research was undertaken with frontline staff, senior leaders, volunteers, beneficiaries and stakeholders from Fulfilling Lives partnerships. This comprised focus groups (21 participants) and individual face-to-face interviews (41 participants), both of which explored barriers and local solutions to accessing statutory mental health services. Following a thematic analysis of transcripts, research participants and stakeholders were invited to a face-to-face workshop to review and validate emerging findings (34 participants).\n\n\nFindings\nPeople experiencing multiple disadvantage face significant barriers in accessing support for their mental health. These include a complex system that is difficult to navigate, long waiting lists, high eligibility thresholds and models of support that lack flexibility. Fulfilling Lives partnerships have had the funding and the flexibility to trial different approaches. Promising solutions to barriers include the use of navigators, person-centred support and multi-agency networks and training. However, overcoming systemic barriers remains the most difficult challenge.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFulfilling Lives was a rare example of substantial and long-term (eight years) funding to work with people experiencing multiple disadvantage. This provided a unique opportunity to try different approaches and gather learning. The programme evaluation provides insights into the experiences of people facing multiple disadvantage and those who support them and offers evidence-based suggestions for policy and practice.\n","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-04-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the barriers to accessing mental health support for people experiencing multiple disadvantage along with some potential solutions for attempting to overcome these. It draws on evidence and learning from 12 voluntary sector-led partnerships in England funded by the National Lottery Community Fund’s Fulfilling Lives programme. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research was undertaken with frontline staff, senior leaders, volunteers, beneficiaries and stakeholders from Fulfilling Lives partnerships. This comprised focus groups (21 participants) and individual face-to-face interviews (41 participants), both of which explored barriers and local solutions to accessing statutory mental health services. Following a thematic analysis of transcripts, research participants and stakeholders were invited to a face-to-face workshop to review and validate emerging findings (34 participants). Findings People experiencing multiple disadvantage face significant barriers in accessing support for their mental health. These include a complex system that is difficult to navigate, long waiting lists, high eligibility thresholds and models of support that lack flexibility. Fulfilling Lives partnerships have had the funding and the flexibility to trial different approaches. Promising solutions to barriers include the use of navigators, person-centred support and multi-agency networks and training. However, overcoming systemic barriers remains the most difficult challenge. Originality/value Fulfilling Lives was a rare example of substantial and long-term (eight years) funding to work with people experiencing multiple disadvantage. This provided a unique opportunity to try different approaches and gather learning. The programme evaluation provides insights into the experiences of people facing multiple disadvantage and those who support them and offers evidence-based suggestions for policy and practice.
改善多重弱势群体获得精神卫生服务的机会
目的本研究旨在探讨多重弱势群体获得心理健康支持的障碍,以及克服这些障碍的潜在解决方案。它借鉴了英国12个由国家彩票社区基金“充实生活”项目资助的自愿部门主导的伙伴关系的证据和经验。设计/方法/方法与前线员工、高层领导、志愿者、受益方和“充实生活”伙伴关系的利益相关者进行了定性研究。这包括焦点小组(21名参与者)和个人面对面访谈(41名参与者),两者都探讨了获得法定精神卫生服务的障碍和当地解决办法。在对成绩单进行专题分析之后,研究参与者和利益相关者被邀请参加面对面的研讨会,以审查和验证新发现(34名参与者)。处于多重不利地位的人在获得心理健康支持方面面临重大障碍。这些问题包括难以驾驭的复杂系统、漫长的等待名单、高资格门槛以及缺乏灵活性的支持模式。充实生活伙伴关系拥有资金和灵活性,可以尝试不同的方法。有希望的障碍解决办法包括使用导航仪、以人为本的支持以及多机构网络和培训。然而,克服体制障碍仍然是最困难的挑战。原创性/价值充实生活是一个罕见的例子,它为经历多重劣势的人提供了大量长期(8年)的资助。这为尝试不同的方法和收集知识提供了一个独特的机会。规划评价提供了对面临多重不利处境的人和支持他们的人的经验的见解,并为政策和实践提供了基于证据的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信